EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Petroleum Product Suppliers
Alexander & Baldwin - per-facility CO₂e intensity
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), Scope 1 emissions reported across 3 reporting facilities in 1 state.
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 67K
- Reporting facilities
- 3
- States covered
- 1
- Overall rank
- #1332
Data updated May 2026
Alexander & Baldwin averages 22K MT CO₂e per reporting facility (low-intensity NTILE) on 67K MT total in 2023.
- Overall rank #1332 of 2,289
- #22 in Petroleum Product Suppliers
- -70.8% since 2011
Alexander & Baldwin vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
66,593 1332nd of 2289 higher than 957 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Alexander & Baldwin spreads its footprint vs Petroleum Product Suppliers peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Petroleum Product Suppliers companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (1 facilities, 1.9M MT).
You are here: Alexander & Baldwin.
Petroleum Product Suppliers peer footprint table: Alexander & Baldwin, 3 facilities, 0.07M MT CO2e. Marathon Petroleum, 7 facilities, 11.62M MT CO2e. Valero Energy, 7 facilities, 8.15M MT CO2e. Pbf Energy, 4 facilities, 6.6M MT CO2e. Pdv America, 3 facilities, 5.96M MT CO2e. Aramco Services, 1 facilities, 5.02M MT CO2e. Phillips 66, 4 facilities, 4.58M MT CO2e. Delaware City Refining CO, 1 facilities, 3.42M MT CO2e. Deer Park Refining, 1 facilities, 3.23M MT CO2e. Exxon Mobil, 2 facilities, 3.09M MT CO2e. Lyondellbasell Industries, 1 facilities, 1.93M MT CO2e. Hollyfrontier Puget Sound Refining, 1 facilities, 1.9M MT CO2e. Total Holdings USA, 1 facilities, 1.86M MT CO2e. Delek US Holdings, 3 facilities, 1.81M MT CO2e. Hf Sinclair, 3 facilities, 1.51M MT CO2e. Delta Air Lines, 1 facilities, 1.21M MT CO2e. Lima Refining, 1 facilities, 1.21M MT CO2e. Bp America, 1 facilities, 0.89M MT CO2e. The William Herbert Hunt Trust Estate, 1 facilities, 0.66M MT CO2e. Hollyfrontier, 2 facilities, 0.54M MT CO2e. Vertex Energy, 1 facilities, 0.41M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent alexander-baldwin · 2023 #1332 · 67K MT
CO2E-THIN · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-PETROLEUM-PR · TREND-CUT · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-THIN 67K MT
- MID-PACK #1332/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Al Sandersville · Power Plants
- FAC-PAIR 3 facilities
- SPAN-HOME 1 state
- SECTOR-PETROLEUM-PR Petroleum Product…
- TREND-CUT −71% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Al Sandersville · Power Plants (±7 MT)
Instrument codes from this parent’s EPA GHGRP rollup: CO₂e band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend, and book completeness. Not an EPA grade or compliance rating.
2023 methane-weighted parent mix
Methane leads the non-CO₂ share for Alexander & Baldwin: CH₄ is 100% of 67K MT CO₂e in 2023 (N₂O 0%). Non-CO₂ gases total 100%. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 0%
- 10 MT
- CH₄
- 100%
- 67K MT
- N₂O
- 0%
- 1 MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Alexander & Baldwin
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest facilities by reported emissions
Alexander & Baldwin - top facilities (MT CO₂e)
Alexander & Baldwin's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Emissions decline across reporting years
Alexander & Baldwin - declining annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 67K MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Alexander & Baldwin annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
Alexander & Baldwin reported 67K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 228K MT in 2011 - a decline of 70.8% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Multi-site facilities (3)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| Hawaiian Commercial and Sugar Company Waste PUUNENE, HI | PUUNENE, HI | 43K |
| Palailai Landfill Waste Kapolei, HI | Kapolei, HI | 24K |
| Asphalt Hawaii Kalaeloa Asphalt Terminal Petroleum Product Suppliers Kapolei, HI | Kapolei, HI | 2 |
Alexander & Baldwin's reported CO₂e by EPA sector
Top sector Waste is 100% of this parent's facility CO₂e (2 sites) ; Petroleum Product Suppliers follows at 0% . Sector labels are EPA GHGRP facility industry_sector values.
Alexander & Baldwin reported facility CO₂e by EPA industry sector
Nationwide parents with similar GHGRP profiles
Three EPA GHGRP-derived peer sets for Alexander & Baldwin. The CO₂e neighbourhood chart above shows poles; these links are navigable comparison paths beyond Petroleum Product Suppliers browse pages.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (67K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (3 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (22K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Alexander & Baldwin's emissions profile
- Alexander & Baldwin runs low-intensity per facility (22K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Petroleum Product Suppliers sector on the Petroleum Product Suppliers industry page.
- It ranks #1332 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Petroleum Product Suppliers emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.