EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Other
Alpha Metallurgical Resources - top-third GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 9 facilities across 2 states (1.4M MT CO₂e in 2023).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 1.4M
- Reporting facilities
- 9
- States covered
- 2
- Overall rank
- #276
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, Alpha Metallurgical Resources reported 1.4M MT CO₂e in 2023 across 9 facilities in 2 states (ranks #276 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions increased 809% over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #276 of 2,289
- #23 in Other
- +809.5% since 2011
Alpha Metallurgical Resources vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
1,351,315 276th of 2289 higher than 2,013 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Alpha Metallurgical Resources spreads its footprint vs Other peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 20 Other companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 2.51M MT).
You are here: Alpha Metallurgical Resources.
Other peer footprint table: Alpha Metallurgical Resources, 9 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e. Prairie State Energy Campus Management, 1 facilities, 11.46M MT CO2e. Marathon Petroleum, 4 facilities, 7.11M MT CO2e. Archer Daniels Midland, 15 facilities, 6.67M MT CO2e. Consol Energy, 4 facilities, 6.53M MT CO2e. American Consolidated Natural Resources, 6 facilities, 6.29M MT CO2e. Hummel Station, 1 facilities, 2.91M MT CO2e. Arch Resources, 5 facilities, 2.83M MT CO2e. US Government, 51 facilities, 2.78M MT CO2e. Poet, 28 facilities, 2.66M MT CO2e. Cargill, 27 facilities, 2.51M MT CO2e. Alliance Holdings Gp, 5 facilities, 2.28M MT CO2e. Valero Energy, 12 facilities, 2.24M MT CO2e. Tyson Foods, 31 facilities, 1.72M MT CO2e. Iron Senergy Holding, 1 facilities, 1.64M MT CO2e. Karnavati Holdings, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. Hatfield Metallurgical Intermediate Holdings, 1 facilities, 1.38M MT CO2e. Hallador Energy, 2 facilities, 1.32M MT CO2e. Green Plains, 11 facilities, 1.3M MT CO2e. Coronado Group, 3 facilities, 1.28M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent alpha-metallurgical-resources · 2023 #276 · 1.4M MT
CO2E-MID · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-MULTI · SPAN-PAIR · SECTOR-OTHER · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MID 1.4M MT
- UPPER-Q #276/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Iowa Fertlizer CO · Chemicals
- FAC-MULTI 9 facilities
- SPAN-PAIR 2 states
- SECTOR-OTHER Other
- TREND-SURGE +810% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Iowa Fertlizer CO · Chemicals (±1K MT)
Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.
2023 methane-weighted parent mix
Methane leads the non-CO₂ share for Alpha Metallurgical Resources: CH₄ is 96.3% of 1.4M MT CO₂e in 2023 (N₂O 0%). Non-CO₂ gases total 96.3%. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 3.7%
- 49K MT
- CH₄
- 96.3%
- 1.3M MT
- N₂O
- 0%
- 215 MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Alpha Metallurgical Resources
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest sites in a top-third parent book
Alpha Metallurgical Resources - top sites (MT CO₂e)
Alpha Metallurgical Resources's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Emissions growth across reporting years
Alpha Metallurgical Resources - rising annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 1.4M MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Alpha Metallurgical Resources annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
Alpha Metallurgical Resources reported 1.4M MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 149K MT in 2011 - a rise of 809.5% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Multi-site facilities (9)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| Deep Mine 41 Other Norton, VA | Norton, VA | 989K |
| KEPLER PROCESSING CO POCAHONTAS NO 51 COAL PREP PLANT Other PINEVILLE, WV | PINEVILLE, WV | 188K |
| Black Eagle Deep Mine Other Pettus, WV | Pettus, WV | 108K |
| McClure River Prep Plant Other McClure, VA | McClure, VA | 27K |
| Lynn Branch No.2 Mine Other Lyburn, WV | Lyburn, WV | 21K |
| Jerry Fork Deep Mine Other Drennen, WV | Drennen, WV | 14K |
| Cedar Grove #2 Mine Other Yolyn, WV | Yolyn, WV | 4K |
| Cedar Grove No.3 Mine Other Lyburn, WV | Lyburn, WV | 700 |
| Davy Branch Mine Other Lyburn, WV | Lyburn, WV | 325 |
Where Alpha Metallurgical Resources's reported CO₂e sits by state
75.1% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Virginia (2 sites) ; next is West Virginia at 24.9% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.
Alpha Metallurgical Resources reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state
Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent
Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (1.4M MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (1.4M MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (9 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (150K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Alpha Metallurgical Resources's emissions profile
- Alpha Metallurgical Resources runs high-intensity per facility (150K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Other sector on the Other industry page.
- It ranks #276 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Other emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.