EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Petroleum Product Suppliers
Arctic Slope Regional - GHG emissions profile
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), Scope 1 emissions reported across 2 reporting facilities in 1 state.
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 113K
- Reporting facilities
- 2
- States covered
- 1
- Overall rank
- #1000
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, Arctic Slope Regional reported 113K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 2 facilities in 1 state (ranks #1,000 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions decreased 8% over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #1000 of 2,289
- #19 in Petroleum Product Suppliers
- -8.0% since 2011
Arctic Slope Regional vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
112,595 1000th of 2289 higher than 1,289 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Arctic Slope Regional spreads its footprint vs Petroleum Product Suppliers peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Petroleum Product Suppliers companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (1 facilities, 1.9M MT).
You are here: Arctic Slope Regional.
Petroleum Product Suppliers peer footprint table: Arctic Slope Regional, 2 facilities, 0.11M MT CO2e. Marathon Petroleum, 7 facilities, 11.62M MT CO2e. Valero Energy, 7 facilities, 8.15M MT CO2e. Pbf Energy, 4 facilities, 6.6M MT CO2e. Pdv America, 3 facilities, 5.96M MT CO2e. Aramco Services, 1 facilities, 5.02M MT CO2e. Phillips 66, 4 facilities, 4.58M MT CO2e. Delaware City Refining CO, 1 facilities, 3.42M MT CO2e. Deer Park Refining, 1 facilities, 3.23M MT CO2e. Exxon Mobil, 2 facilities, 3.09M MT CO2e. Lyondellbasell Industries, 1 facilities, 1.93M MT CO2e. Hollyfrontier Puget Sound Refining, 1 facilities, 1.9M MT CO2e. Total Holdings USA, 1 facilities, 1.86M MT CO2e. Delek US Holdings, 3 facilities, 1.81M MT CO2e. Hf Sinclair, 3 facilities, 1.51M MT CO2e. Delta Air Lines, 1 facilities, 1.21M MT CO2e. Lima Refining, 1 facilities, 1.21M MT CO2e. Bp America, 1 facilities, 0.89M MT CO2e. The William Herbert Hunt Trust Estate, 1 facilities, 0.66M MT CO2e. Hollyfrontier, 2 facilities, 0.54M MT CO2e. Vertex Energy, 1 facilities, 0.41M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent arctic-slope-regional · 2023 #1000 · 113K MT
CO2E-MODEST · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-PETROLEUM-PR · TREND-DOWN · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MODEST 113K MT
- MID-PACK #1000/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH US Silica Holdings · Other
- FAC-PAIR 2 facilities
- SPAN-HOME 1 state
- SECTOR-PETROLEUM-PR Petroleum Product…
- TREND-DOWN −8% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: US Silica Holdings · Other (±38 MT)
Instrument codes from this parent’s EPA GHGRP rollup: CO₂e band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend, and book completeness. Not an EPA grade or compliance rating.
2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book
This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99% of 113K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 99%
- 111K MT
- CH₄
- 0.8%
- 909 MT
- N₂O
- 0.2%
- 218 MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Arctic Slope Regional
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest facilities by reported emissions
Arctic Slope Regional - top facilities (MT CO₂e)
Arctic Slope Regional's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Reported emissions over time
Arctic Slope Regional - annual reported GHG emissions
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 113K MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Arctic Slope Regional annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
Arctic Slope Regional reported 113K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 122K MT in 2011 - a decline of 8.0% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Facilities (2)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| PETRO STAR VALDEZ REFINERY Chemicals VALDEZ, AK | VALDEZ, AK | 77K |
| PETRO STAR INC NORTH POLE REFINERY Petroleum Product Suppliers NORTH POLE, AK | NORTH POLE, AK | 36K |
Arctic Slope Regional's reported CO₂e by EPA sector
Top sector Chemicals is 68.4% of this parent's facility CO₂e (1 site) ; Petroleum Product Suppliers follows at 31.6% . Sector labels are EPA GHGRP facility industry_sector values.
Arctic Slope Regional reported facility CO₂e by EPA industry sector
Nationwide parents with similar GHGRP profiles
Three EPA GHGRP-derived peer sets for Arctic Slope Regional. The CO₂e neighbourhood chart above shows poles; these links are navigable comparison paths beyond Petroleum Product Suppliers browse pages.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (113K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (2 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (56K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Arctic Slope Regional's emissions profile
- Arctic Slope Regional runs mid-intensity per facility (56K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Petroleum Product Suppliers sector on the Petroleum Product Suppliers industry page.
- It ranks #1000 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Petroleum Product Suppliers emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.