EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Power Plants

Basin Creek Power Services - rising reported GHG

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), Scope 1 emissions reported across 1 reporting facility in 1 state.

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
56K
Reporting facilities
1
States covered
1
Overall rank
#1457
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

56K MT CO₂e · 2023

Basin Creek Power Services reported emissions rose 16.3% since 2013 to 56K MT CO₂e in 2023.

  • Overall rank #1457 of 2,289
  • #355 in Power Plants
  • +16.3% since 2013

Basin Creek Power Services vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

55,610 1457th of 2289 higher than 832 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Basin Creek Power Services spreads its footprint vs Power Plants peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Power Plants companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (19 facilities, 26.77M MT).

Median split: 19 facilities, 26.77M MT CO₂e among Power Plants peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 01020304050 0M20M40M60M80M100M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Power Plants
Median split: 19 facilities, 26.77M MT CO₂e among Power Plants peers.

You are here: Basin Creek Power Services.

Power Plants peer footprint table: Basin Creek Power Services, 1 facilities, 0.06M MT CO2e. Vistra, 40 facilities, 86.32M MT CO2e. The Southern, 26 facilities, 78.01M MT CO2e. Duke Energy, 39 facilities, 65.01M MT CO2e. CPN Management, 43 facilities, 47.58M MT CO2e. Nextera Energy, 19 facilities, 45.57M MT CO2e. American Electric Power CO, 22 facilities, 44.72M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 27 facilities, 39.8M MT CO2e. US Government, 21 facilities, 38.21M MT CO2e. Entergy, 23 facilities, 33.86M MT CO2e. Xcel Energy, 28 facilities, 29.03M MT CO2e. PPL, 6 facilities, 26.77M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 22 facilities, 25.19M MT CO2e. DTE Energy, 12 facilities, 22.31M MT CO2e. NRG Energy, 14 facilities, 22.1M MT CO2e. Ameren, 11 facilities, 19.88M MT CO2e. Evergy, 12 facilities, 19.87M MT CO2e. Lightstone Generation, 4 facilities, 19.14M MT CO2e. Talen Energy, 11 facilities, 17.72M MT CO2e. Associated Electric Cooperative, 7 facilities, 15.57M MT CO2e. Aes, 8 facilities, 15.45M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent basin-creek-power-services · 2023 #1457 · 56K MT

CO2E-THIN · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-SINGLE · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS · TREND-UP · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-THIN 56K MT
  • MID-PACK #1457/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH Textron · Metals
  • FAC-SINGLE 1 facility
  • SPAN-HOME 1 state
  • SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS Power Plants
  • TREND-UP +16% since 2013
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: Textron · Metals (±30 MT)

Instrument codes from this parent’s EPA GHGRP rollup: CO₂e band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend, and book completeness. Not an EPA grade or compliance rating.

2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book

This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 56K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
99.9%
56K MT
CH₄
0%
26 MT
N₂O
0.1%
31 MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Basin Creek Power Services

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MBasin Creek Power Ser… · Pow…56KTextron · Metals · near56KCounty of Outagamie W… · Was…56KCounty of Kern Califo… · Was…56KGallatin County Solid… · Was…56KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Basin Creek Power Services · May 2026

Emissions growth across reporting years

Basin Creek Power Services - rising annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2013–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
56K MT
11 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0M0.02M0.04M0.06M0.08M0.1M 20132014201520162017201820192020202120222023 0.06M

Basin Creek Power Services annual reported GHG emissions, 2013–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Basin Creek Power Services reported 56K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 48K MT in 2013 - a rise of 16.3% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Facilities (1)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
Basin Creek Plant
Power Plants
Butte, MT
56K

Nationwide parents with similar GHGRP profiles

Three EPA GHGRP-derived peer sets for Basin Creek Power Services. The CO₂e neighbourhood chart above shows poles; these links are navigable comparison paths beyond Power Plants browse pages.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Basin Creek Power Services's emissions profile

  • Basin Creek Power Services runs mid-intensity per facility (56K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Power Plants sector on the Power Plants industry page.
  • It ranks #1457 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Power Plants emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.