EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems

Byron Energy - lower-footprint GHGRP parent

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), a smaller reporting parent: 43K MT CO₂e from 1 site in 1 state (2023).

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
43K
Reporting facilities
1
States covered
1
Overall rank
#1651
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

43K MT CO₂e · 2023

According to the EPA GHGRP, Byron Energy reported 43K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 1 facility in 1 state (ranks #1,651 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions increased 23% over the tracked period.

  • Overall rank #1651 of 2,289
  • #116 in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
  • +23.2% since 2022

Byron Energy vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

42,596 1651st of 2289 higher than 638 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Byron Energy spreads its footprint vs Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (21 facilities, 2.77M MT).

Median split: 21 facilities, 2.77M MT CO₂e among Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 050100150200 0M5M10M15M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Median split: 21 facilities, 2.77M MT CO₂e among Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers.

You are here: Byron Energy.

Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peer footprint table: Byron Energy, 1 facilities, 0.04M MT CO2e. Cheniere Energy, 5 facilities, 9.73M MT CO2e. Energy Transfer, 129 facilities, 8.89M MT CO2e. Hilcorp Energy, 18 facilities, 8.26M MT CO2e. Kinder Morgan, 169 facilities, 8.24M MT CO2e. Enterprise Products Partners, 43 facilities, 7.79M MT CO2e. Enbridge (us), 80 facilities, 5.72M MT CO2e. The Williams Cos, 59 facilities, 5.48M MT CO2e. Transcanada Pipeline USA, 76 facilities, 4.45M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 5 facilities, 3.26M MT CO2e. Venture Global LNG, 1 facilities, 2.84M MT CO2e. Sempra Energy, 5 facilities, 2.77M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 56 facilities, 2.3M MT CO2e. Targa Resources, 21 facilities, 2.22M MT CO2e. GIP Pilot Acquisition Partners, 26 facilities, 2.08M MT CO2e. Loews, 41 facilities, 1.94M MT CO2e. Occidental Petroleum, 19 facilities, 1.55M MT CO2e. Enlink Midstream, 11 facilities, 1.5M MT CO2e. Oneok, 23 facilities, 1.44M MT CO2e. Ecoelectrica, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. IKAV Impact USA, 4 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent byron-energy · 2023 #1651 · 43K MT

CO2E-THIN · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-SINGLE · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN · TREND-UP · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-THIN 43K MT
  • MID-PACK #1651/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH County of Muscatine I… · Waste
  • FAC-SINGLE 1 facility
  • SPAN-HOME 1 state
  • SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN Petroleum and Nat…
  • TREND-UP +23% since 2022
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: County of Muscatine Iowa · Waste (±72 MT)

Lower-footprint parent stamps from this GHGRP rollup, comparative context only, not a compliance rating.

2023 methane-weighted parent mix

Methane leads the non-CO₂ share for Byron Energy: CH₄ is 78.2% of 43K MT CO₂e in 2023 (N₂O 0%). Non-CO₂ gases total 78.2%. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
21.8%
9K MT
CH₄
78.2%
33K MT
N₂O
0%
5 MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Byron Energy

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MCfs Group Disposal &… · Wast…43KCounty of Muscatine I… · Was…43KByron Energy · Petroleum a… …43KVinton Steel · Metals · near43KFour S Oil CO · Waste · near42KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Byron Energy · May 2026

Emissions growth across reporting years

Byron Energy - rising annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2022–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
43K MT
2 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0.03M0.03M0.04M0.04M0.05M 20222023 0.04M

Byron Energy annual reported GHG emissions, 2022–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Byron Energy reported 43K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 35K MT in 2022 - a rise of 23.2% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Facilities (1)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
SM 58 G
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Offshore, LA
43K

Nationwide peers for a lower-footprint parent

Comparison paths for a smaller GHGRP parent: nearest CO₂e totals, similar facility counts, and intensity neighbors beyond Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems browse pages.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Byron Energy's emissions profile

  • Byron Energy runs low-intensity per facility (43K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems sector on the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems industry page.
  • It ranks #1651 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.