EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Power Plants

Centrio Energy Seattle - declining reported GHG

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), Scope 1 emissions reported across 1 reporting facility in 1 state.

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
69K
Reporting facilities
1
States covered
1
Overall rank
#1310
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

69K MT CO₂e · 2023

Centrio Energy Seattle reported emissions fell 10.3% since 2011 to 69K MT CO₂e in 2023.

  • Overall rank #1310 of 2,289
  • #338 in Power Plants
  • -10.3% since 2011

Centrio Energy Seattle vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

68,651 1310th of 2289 higher than 979 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Centrio Energy Seattle spreads its footprint vs Power Plants peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Power Plants companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (19 facilities, 26.77M MT).

Median split: 19 facilities, 26.77M MT CO₂e among Power Plants peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 01020304050 0M20M40M60M80M100M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Power Plants
Median split: 19 facilities, 26.77M MT CO₂e among Power Plants peers.

You are here: Centrio Energy Seattle.

Power Plants peer footprint table: Centrio Energy Seattle, 1 facilities, 0.07M MT CO2e. Vistra, 40 facilities, 86.32M MT CO2e. The Southern, 26 facilities, 78.01M MT CO2e. Duke Energy, 39 facilities, 65.01M MT CO2e. CPN Management, 43 facilities, 47.58M MT CO2e. Nextera Energy, 19 facilities, 45.57M MT CO2e. American Electric Power CO, 22 facilities, 44.72M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 27 facilities, 39.8M MT CO2e. US Government, 21 facilities, 38.21M MT CO2e. Entergy, 23 facilities, 33.86M MT CO2e. Xcel Energy, 28 facilities, 29.03M MT CO2e. PPL, 6 facilities, 26.77M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 22 facilities, 25.19M MT CO2e. DTE Energy, 12 facilities, 22.31M MT CO2e. NRG Energy, 14 facilities, 22.1M MT CO2e. Ameren, 11 facilities, 19.88M MT CO2e. Evergy, 12 facilities, 19.87M MT CO2e. Lightstone Generation, 4 facilities, 19.14M MT CO2e. Talen Energy, 11 facilities, 17.72M MT CO2e. Associated Electric Cooperative, 7 facilities, 15.57M MT CO2e. Aes, 8 facilities, 15.45M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent centrio-energy-seattle · 2023 #1310 · 69K MT

CO2E-THIN · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-SINGLE · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS · TREND-DOWN · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-THIN 69K MT
  • MID-PACK #1310/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH Newton County Board o… · Waste
  • FAC-SINGLE 1 facility
  • SPAN-HOME 1 state
  • SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS Power Plants
  • TREND-DOWN −10% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: Newton County Board of Commissioners · Waste (±43 MT)

Instrument codes from this parent’s EPA GHGRP rollup: CO₂e band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend, and book completeness. Not an EPA grade or compliance rating.

2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book

This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 69K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
99.9%
69K MT
CH₄
0%
33 MT
N₂O
0.1%
41 MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Centrio Energy Seattle

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MWasatch Integrated Wa… · Was…69KCentrio Energy Seattle · Pow…69KNewton County Board o… · Was…69KGolden Triangle Energy · Oth…69KCrittenden County Ar · Waste…69KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Centrio Energy Seattle · May 2026

Emissions decline across reporting years

Centrio Energy Seattle - declining annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
69K MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0.06M0.06M0.07M0.07M0.08M0.08M0.09M 2011201320152017201920212023 0.07M

Centrio Energy Seattle annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Centrio Energy Seattle reported 69K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 77K MT in 2011 - a decline of 10.3% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Facilities (1)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
CenTrio
Power Plants
SEATTLE, WA
69K

Nationwide parents with similar GHGRP profiles

Three EPA GHGRP-derived peer sets for Centrio Energy Seattle. The CO₂e neighbourhood chart above shows poles; these links are navigable comparison paths beyond Power Plants browse pages.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Centrio Energy Seattle's emissions profile

  • Centrio Energy Seattle runs mid-intensity per facility (69K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Power Plants sector on the Power Plants industry page.
  • It ranks #1310 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Power Plants emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.