EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Power Plants

Chugach Electric Assoc - top-third GHGRP parent

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 3 facilities across 1 state (793K MT CO₂e in 2023).

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
793K
Reporting facilities
3
States covered
1
Overall rank
#383
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

793K MT CO₂e · 2023

According to the EPA GHGRP, Chugach Electric Assoc reported 793K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 3 facilities in 1 state (ranks #383 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions decreased 58% over the tracked period.

  • Overall rank #383 of 2,289
  • #209 in Power Plants
  • -58.4% since 2011

Chugach Electric Assoc vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

792,692 383rd of 2289 higher than 1,906 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Chugach Electric Assoc spreads its footprint vs Power Plants peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Power Plants companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (19 facilities, 26.77M MT).

Median split: 19 facilities, 26.77M MT CO₂e among Power Plants peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 01020304050 0M20M40M60M80M100M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Power Plants
Median split: 19 facilities, 26.77M MT CO₂e among Power Plants peers.

You are here: Chugach Electric Assoc.

Power Plants peer footprint table: Chugach Electric Assoc, 3 facilities, 0.79M MT CO2e. Vistra, 40 facilities, 86.32M MT CO2e. The Southern, 26 facilities, 78.01M MT CO2e. Duke Energy, 39 facilities, 65.01M MT CO2e. CPN Management, 43 facilities, 47.58M MT CO2e. Nextera Energy, 19 facilities, 45.57M MT CO2e. American Electric Power CO, 22 facilities, 44.72M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 27 facilities, 39.8M MT CO2e. US Government, 21 facilities, 38.21M MT CO2e. Entergy, 23 facilities, 33.86M MT CO2e. Xcel Energy, 28 facilities, 29.03M MT CO2e. PPL, 6 facilities, 26.77M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 22 facilities, 25.19M MT CO2e. DTE Energy, 12 facilities, 22.31M MT CO2e. NRG Energy, 14 facilities, 22.1M MT CO2e. Ameren, 11 facilities, 19.88M MT CO2e. Evergy, 12 facilities, 19.87M MT CO2e. Lightstone Generation, 4 facilities, 19.14M MT CO2e. Talen Energy, 11 facilities, 17.72M MT CO2e. Associated Electric Cooperative, 7 facilities, 15.57M MT CO2e. Aes, 8 facilities, 15.45M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent chugach-electric-assoc · 2023 #383 · 793K MT

CO2E-MODEST · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS · TREND-CUT · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-MODEST 793K MT
  • UPPER-Q #383/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH Intel · Other
  • FAC-PAIR 3 facilities
  • SPAN-HOME 1 state
  • SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS Power Plants
  • TREND-CUT −58% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: Intel · Other (±2K MT)

Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.

2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book

This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 793K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
99.9%
792K MT
CH₄
0%
373 MT
N₂O
0.1%
445 MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Chugach Electric Assoc

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MMunicipal Energy Agen… · Pow…799KSk Capital Partners · Chemic…796KChugach Electric Assoc · Pow…793KIntel · Other · near791KAlamo Cement · Minerals · ne…787KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Chugach Electric Assoc · May 2026

Largest sites in a top-third parent book

Chugach Electric Assoc - top sites (MT CO₂e)

International Station Power …417KGEORGE SULLIVAN PLANT TWO370KCHUGACH - BELUGA RIVER POWER…6K

Chugach Electric Assoc's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Emissions decline across reporting years

Chugach Electric Assoc - declining annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
793K MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0.5M1M1.5M2M 2011201320152017201920212023 0.79M

Chugach Electric Assoc annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Chugach Electric Assoc reported 793K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 1.9M MT in 2011 - a decline of 58.4% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Multi-site facilities (3)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
International Station Power Plant
Power Plants
Anchorage, AK
417K
GEORGE SULLIVAN PLANT TWO
Power Plants
ANCHORAGE, AK
370K
CHUGACH - BELUGA RIVER POWER PLANT
Power Plants
Beluga, AK
6K

Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent

Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (793K MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Chugach Electric Assoc's emissions profile

  • Chugach Electric Assoc runs high-intensity per facility (264K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Power Plants sector on the Power Plants industry page.
  • It ranks #383 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Power Plants emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.