EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Power Plants

City of Redding California - per-facility CO₂e intensity

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), high per-facility intensity (169K MT/site) across 1 reporting facility in 1 state.

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
169K
Reporting facilities
1
States covered
1
Overall rank
#801
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

169K MT CO₂e · 2023

City of Redding California averages 169K MT CO₂e per reporting facility (high-intensity NTILE) on 169K MT total in 2023.

  • Overall rank #801 of 2,289
  • #289 in Power Plants
  • +537.0% since 2011

City of Redding California vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

169,404 801st of 2289 higher than 1,488 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How City of Redding California spreads its footprint vs Power Plants peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Power Plants companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (19 facilities, 26.77M MT).

Median split: 19 facilities, 26.77M MT CO₂e among Power Plants peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 01020304050 0M20M40M60M80M100M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Power Plants
Median split: 19 facilities, 26.77M MT CO₂e among Power Plants peers.

You are here: City of Redding California.

Power Plants peer footprint table: City of Redding California, 1 facilities, 0.17M MT CO2e. Vistra, 40 facilities, 86.32M MT CO2e. The Southern, 26 facilities, 78.01M MT CO2e. Duke Energy, 39 facilities, 65.01M MT CO2e. CPN Management, 43 facilities, 47.58M MT CO2e. Nextera Energy, 19 facilities, 45.57M MT CO2e. American Electric Power CO, 22 facilities, 44.72M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 27 facilities, 39.8M MT CO2e. US Government, 21 facilities, 38.21M MT CO2e. Entergy, 23 facilities, 33.86M MT CO2e. Xcel Energy, 28 facilities, 29.03M MT CO2e. PPL, 6 facilities, 26.77M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 22 facilities, 25.19M MT CO2e. DTE Energy, 12 facilities, 22.31M MT CO2e. NRG Energy, 14 facilities, 22.1M MT CO2e. Ameren, 11 facilities, 19.88M MT CO2e. Evergy, 12 facilities, 19.87M MT CO2e. Lightstone Generation, 4 facilities, 19.14M MT CO2e. Talen Energy, 11 facilities, 17.72M MT CO2e. Associated Electric Cooperative, 7 facilities, 15.57M MT CO2e. Aes, 8 facilities, 15.45M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent city-of-redding-california · 2023 #801 · 169K MT

CO2E-MODEST · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-SINGLE · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-MODEST 169K MT
  • MID-PACK #801/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH American Cast Iron Pi… · Metals
  • FAC-SINGLE 1 facility
  • SPAN-HOME 1 state
  • SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS Power Plants
  • TREND-SURGE +537% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: American Cast Iron Pipe · Metals (±14 MT)

Instrument codes from this parent’s EPA GHGRP rollup: CO₂e band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend, and book completeness. Not an EPA grade or compliance rating.

2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book

This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 169K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
99.9%
169K MT
CH₄
0%
79 MT
N₂O
0.1%
94 MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around City of Redding California

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MGenon Holdings · Power Plant…170KGolden Grain Energy · Other …170KCity of Redding Calif… · Pow…169KAmerican Cast Iron Pi… · Met…169KState of North Caroli… · Oth…169KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around City of Redding California · May 2026

Emissions growth across reporting years

City of Redding California - rising annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
169K MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0M0.05M0.1M0.15M0.2M 2011201320152017201920212023 0.17M

City of Redding California annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

City of Redding California reported 169K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 27K MT in 2011 - a rise of 537.0% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Facilities (1)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
Redding Power Plant
Power Plants
REDDING, CA
169K

Nationwide parents with similar intensity profiles

Intensity-led peer sets around 169K MT per facility, plus nearest totals and facility-book matches.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using City of Redding California's emissions profile

  • City of Redding California runs high-intensity per facility (169K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Power Plants sector on the Power Plants industry page.
  • It ranks #801 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Power Plants emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.