EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2018 · Injection of CO2
Core Energy - lower-footprint GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), a smaller reporting parent: 30K MT CO₂e from 1 site in 1 state (2018).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 30K
- Reporting facilities
- 1
- States covered
- 1
- Overall rank
- #1880
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, Core Energy reported 30K MT CO₂e in 2018 across 1 facility in 1 state (ranks #1,880 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions remained broadly stable over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #1880 of 2,289
- #7 in Injection of CO2
- +4.0% since 2017
Core Energy vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
30,326 1880th of 2289 higher than 409 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2018
How Core Energy spreads its footprint vs Injection of CO2 peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 16 Injection of CO2 companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (1 facilities, 0.15M MT).
You are here: Core Energy.
Injection of CO2 peer footprint table: Core Energy, 1 facilities, 0.03M MT CO2e. Archer Daniels Midland, 1 facilities, 3.82M MT CO2e. Exxon Mobil, 1 facilities, 3.16M MT CO2e. Enbridge (us), 4 facilities, 0.73M MT CO2e. Lucid Energy Group II, 1 facilities, 0.57M MT CO2e. Targa Resources, 6 facilities, 0.41M MT CO2e. Stakeholder Gas Services, 2 facilities, 0.3M MT CO2e. Energy Transfer, 3 facilities, 0.21M MT CO2e. Durango Midstream, 2 facilities, 0.15M MT CO2e. Red Trail Energy, 1 facilities, 0.09M MT CO2e. Contango Resources, 1 facilities, 0.07M MT CO2e. Pinon Midstream, 1 facilities, 0.07M MT CO2e. Oneok, 1 facilities, 0.06M MT CO2e. The Williams Cos, 1 facilities, 0.04M MT CO2e. Occidental Petroleum, 1 facilities, 0.04M MT CO2e. Riverside Energy, 1 facilities, 0M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent core-energy · 2018 #1880 · 30K MT
CO2E-THIN · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-SINGLE · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-INJECTION-OF · TREND-FLAT · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-THIN 30K MT
- LOWER-Q #1880/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Petro-Hunt · Natural Gas a…
- FAC-SINGLE 1 facility
- SPAN-HOME 1 state
- SECTOR-INJECTION-OF Injection of CO2
- TREND-FLAT +4% since 2017
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Petro-Hunt · Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids Suppliers (±12 MT)
Lower-footprint parent stamps from this GHGRP rollup, comparative context only, not a compliance rating.
CO₂e neighbourhood around Core Energy
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Reported emissions over time
Core Energy - annual reported GHG emissions
EPA GHGRP 2017–2018 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2018
- 30K MT
- 2 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Core Energy annual reported GHG emissions, 2017–2018
Core Energy reported 30K MT CO₂e in 2018, compared with 29K MT in 2017 - a rise of 4.0% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Facilities (1)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| Core Energy Otsego County EOR Operations Injection of CO2 Gaylord, MI | Gaylord, MI | 30K |
Nationwide peers for a lower-footprint parent
Comparison paths for a smaller GHGRP parent: nearest CO₂e totals, similar facility counts, and intensity neighbors beyond Injection of CO2 browse pages.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (30K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (1 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (30K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Core Energy's emissions profile
- Core Energy runs low-intensity per facility (30K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Injection of CO2 sector on the Injection of CO2 industry page.
- It ranks #1880 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Injection of CO2 emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.