EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2018 · Injection of CO2
Core Energy - lower-footprint GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), a smaller reporting parent: 30K MT CO₂e from 1 site in 1 state (2018).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 30K
- Reporting facilities
- 1
- States covered
- 1
- Overall rank
- #1880
Last reported 2018. This company's newest EPA GHGRP report is for 2018, not 2023, so its figures and its rank compare older data with 2023 peers. The ranking tables mark companies like this one with a "Last reported" label.
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, Core Energy reported 30K MT CO₂e in 2018 across 1 facility in 1 state (ranks #1,880 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions remained broadly stable over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #1880 of 2,289
- #7 in Injection of CO2
- +4.0% since 2017
Core Energy vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
30,326 1880th of 2289 higher than 409 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2018
How Core Energy spreads its footprint vs Injection of CO2 peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 16 Injection of CO2 companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (1 facilities, 0.15M MT).
You are here: Core Energy.
Injection of CO2 peer footprint table: Core Energy, 1 facilities, 0.03M MT CO2e. Archer Daniels Midland, 1 facilities, 3.82M MT CO2e. Exxon Mobil, 1 facilities, 3.16M MT CO2e. Enbridge (us), 4 facilities, 0.73M MT CO2e. Lucid Energy Group II, 1 facilities, 0.57M MT CO2e. Targa Resources, 6 facilities, 0.41M MT CO2e. Stakeholder Gas Services, 2 facilities, 0.3M MT CO2e. Energy Transfer, 3 facilities, 0.21M MT CO2e. Durango Midstream, 2 facilities, 0.15M MT CO2e. Red Trail Energy, 1 facilities, 0.09M MT CO2e. Contango Resources, 1 facilities, 0.07M MT CO2e. Pinon Midstream, 1 facilities, 0.07M MT CO2e. Oneok, 1 facilities, 0.06M MT CO2e. The Williams Cos, 1 facilities, 0.04M MT CO2e. Occidental Petroleum, 1 facilities, 0.04M MT CO2e. Riverside Energy, 1 facilities, 0M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent core-energy · 2018 #1880 · 30K MT
CO2E-THIN · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-SINGLE · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-INJECTION-OF · TREND-FLAT · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-THIN 30K MT
- LOWER-Q #1880/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Petro-Hunt · Natural Gas a…
- FAC-SINGLE 1 facility
- SPAN-HOME 1 state
- SECTOR-INJECTION-OF Injection of CO2
- TREND-FLAT +4% since 2017
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Petro-Hunt · Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids Suppliers (±12 MT)
Lower-footprint parent stamps from this GHGRP rollup, comparative context only, not a compliance rating.
CO₂e neighbourhood around Core Energy
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Reported emissions over time
Core Energy - annual reported GHG emissions
EPA GHGRP 2017–2018 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2018
- 30K MT
- 2 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Core Energy annual reported GHG emissions, 2017–2018
Core Energy reported 30K MT CO₂e in 2018, compared with 29K MT in 2017 - a rise of 4.0% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Facilities (1)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| Core Energy Otsego County EOR Operations Injection of CO2 Gaylord, MI | Gaylord, MI | 30K |
Nationwide peers for a lower-footprint parent
Comparison paths for a smaller GHGRP parent: nearest CO₂e totals, similar facility counts, and intensity neighbors beyond Injection of CO2 browse pages.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (30K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (1 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (30K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Core Energy's emissions profile
- Core Energy runs low-intensity per facility (30K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Injection of CO2 sector on the Injection of CO2 industry page.
- It ranks #1880 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Injection of CO2 emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.