EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Waste

County of Alamance North Carolina - per-facility CO₂e intensity

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), high per-facility intensity (135K MT/site) across 1 reporting facility in 1 state.

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
135K
Reporting facilities
1
States covered
1
Overall rank
#905
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

135K MT CO₂e · 2023

County of Alamance North Carolina averages 135K MT CO₂e per reporting facility (high-intensity NTILE) on 135K MT total in 2023.

  • Overall rank #905 of 2,289
  • #124 in Waste
  • +26.4% since 2011

County of Alamance North Carolina vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

134,682 905th of 2289 higher than 1,384 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How County of Alamance North Carolina spreads its footprint vs Waste peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Waste companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 0.7M MT).

Median split: 5 facilities, 0.7M MT CO₂e among Waste peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 050100150200250 0M5M10M15M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Waste
Median split: 5 facilities, 0.7M MT CO₂e among Waste peers.

You are here: County of Alamance North Carolina.

Waste peer footprint table: County of Alamance North Carolina, 1 facilities, 0.13M MT CO2e. Waste Management, 225 facilities, 11.65M MT CO2e. Republic Services, 177 facilities, 10.72M MT CO2e. Covanta Holding, 22 facilities, 4.2M MT CO2e. Waste Connections US, 40 facilities, 3.63M MT CO2e. Gfl Environmental Holdings (us), 30 facilities, 2.45M MT CO2e. Wheelabrator Technologies Holdings, 12 facilities, 2.22M MT CO2e. Rumpke Consolidated Cos, 9 facilities, 1.69M MT CO2e. County of Orange California, 5 facilities, 1.13M MT CO2e. County of Lycoming Pennsylvania, 1 facilities, 0.9M MT CO2e. County of Pinellas Florida, 2 facilities, 0.77M MT CO2e. Apex Environmental, 1 facilities, 0.7M MT CO2e. County of Brevard Florida, 1 facilities, 0.67M MT CO2e. City of El Paso Texas, 2 facilities, 0.54M MT CO2e. Waste Connections, 8 facilities, 0.51M MT CO2e. City of Baton Rouge Louisiana, 2 facilities, 0.51M MT CO2e. Solid Waste Authority of Palm Beach County Florida, 3 facilities, 0.5M MT CO2e. City of Dallas Texas, 1 facilities, 0.48M MT CO2e. Casella Waste Systems, 9 facilities, 0.46M MT CO2e. County of Polk Florida, 1 facilities, 0.43M MT CO2e. US Government, 9 facilities, 0.42M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent county-of-alamance-north-carolina · 2023 #905 · 135K MT

CO2E-MODEST · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-SINGLE · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-WASTE · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-MODEST 135K MT
  • MID-PACK #905/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH MRP Elgin · Power Plants
  • FAC-SINGLE 1 facility
  • SPAN-HOME 1 state
  • SECTOR-WASTE Waste
  • TREND-SURGE +26% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: MRP Elgin · Power Plants (±121 MT)

Instrument codes from this parent’s EPA GHGRP rollup: CO₂e band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend, and book completeness. Not an EPA grade or compliance rating.

2023 methane-weighted parent mix

Methane leads the non-CO₂ share for County of Alamance North Carolina: CH₄ is 100% of 135K MT CO₂e in 2023 (N₂O 0%). Non-CO₂ gases total 100%. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
-
n/r
CH₄
100%
135K MT
N₂O
-
n/r

CO₂e neighbourhood around County of Alamance North Carolina

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MCity of Port Arthur · Waste …135KCounty of Alamance No… · Was…135KMRP Elgin · Power Plants · n…135KAbbott Laboratories · Other …134KMitsubishi CORP (amer… · Pow…134KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around County of Alamance North Carolina · May 2026

Emissions growth across reporting years

County of Alamance North Carolina - rising annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
135K MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0.11M0.11M0.12M0.12M0.13M0.13M0.14M 2011201320152017201920212023 0.13M

County of Alamance North Carolina annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

County of Alamance North Carolina reported 135K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 107K MT in 2011 - a rise of 26.4% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Facilities (1)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
Alamance County Landfill
Waste
Graham, NC
135K

Nationwide parents with similar intensity profiles

Intensity-led peer sets around 135K MT per facility, plus nearest totals and facility-book matches.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using County of Alamance North Carolina's emissions profile

  • County of Alamance North Carolina runs high-intensity per facility (135K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Waste sector on the Waste industry page.
  • It ranks #905 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Waste emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.