EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2015 · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Crimson Resource Management - lower-footprint GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), a smaller reporting parent: 27K MT CO₂e from 1 site in 1 state (2015).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 27K
- Reporting facilities
- 1
- States covered
- 1
- Overall rank
- #1971
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, Crimson Resource Management reported 27K MT CO₂e in 2015 across 1 facility in 1 state (ranks #1,971 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e)
- Overall rank #1971 of 2,289
- #134 in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
- Reporting years 2015–2015
Crimson Resource Management vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
26,511 1971st of 2289 higher than 318 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2015
How Crimson Resource Management spreads its footprint vs Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (21 facilities, 2.77M MT).
You are here: Crimson Resource Management.
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peer footprint table: Crimson Resource Management, 1 facilities, 0.03M MT CO2e. Cheniere Energy, 5 facilities, 9.73M MT CO2e. Energy Transfer, 129 facilities, 8.89M MT CO2e. Hilcorp Energy, 18 facilities, 8.26M MT CO2e. Kinder Morgan, 169 facilities, 8.24M MT CO2e. Enterprise Products Partners, 43 facilities, 7.79M MT CO2e. Enbridge (us), 80 facilities, 5.72M MT CO2e. The Williams Cos, 59 facilities, 5.48M MT CO2e. Transcanada Pipeline USA, 76 facilities, 4.45M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 5 facilities, 3.26M MT CO2e. Venture Global LNG, 1 facilities, 2.84M MT CO2e. Sempra Energy, 5 facilities, 2.77M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 56 facilities, 2.3M MT CO2e. Targa Resources, 21 facilities, 2.22M MT CO2e. GIP Pilot Acquisition Partners, 26 facilities, 2.08M MT CO2e. Loews, 41 facilities, 1.94M MT CO2e. Occidental Petroleum, 19 facilities, 1.55M MT CO2e. Enlink Midstream, 11 facilities, 1.5M MT CO2e. Oneok, 23 facilities, 1.44M MT CO2e. Ecoelectrica, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. IKAV Impact USA, 4 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent crimson-resource-management · 2015 #1971 · 27K MT
CO2E-THIN · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-SINGLE · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN · TREND-UNK · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-THIN 27K MT
- LOWER-Q #1971/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH James Madison Univers… · Other
- FAC-SINGLE 1 facility
- SPAN-HOME 1 state
- SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN Petroleum and Nat…
- TREND-UNK Trend thin
- BOOK-RICH 6/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: James Madison University · Other (±9 MT)
Lower-footprint parent stamps from this GHGRP rollup, comparative context only, not a compliance rating.
CO₂e neighbourhood around Crimson Resource Management
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Facilities (1)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| Crimson Resource Management Corp. Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Bakersfield, CA | Bakersfield, CA | 27K |
Nationwide peers for a lower-footprint parent
Comparison paths for a smaller GHGRP parent: nearest CO₂e totals, similar facility counts, and intensity neighbors beyond Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems browse pages.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (27K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (1 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (27K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Crimson Resource Management's emissions profile
- Crimson Resource Management runs low-intensity per facility (27K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems sector on the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems industry page.
- It ranks #1971 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.