EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Injection of CO2
Durango Midstream - rising reported GHG
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), Scope 1 emissions reported across 2 reporting facilities in 1 state.
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 149K
- Reporting facilities
- 2
- States covered
- 1
- Overall rank
- #860
Data updated May 2026
Durango Midstream reported emissions rose 111.8% since 2011 to 149K MT CO₂e in 2023.
- Overall rank #860 of 2,289
- #4 in Injection of CO2
- +111.8% since 2011
Durango Midstream vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
148,720 860th of 2289 higher than 1,429 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Durango Midstream spreads its footprint vs Injection of CO2 peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 16 Injection of CO2 companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (1 facilities, 0.15M MT).
You are here: Durango Midstream.
Injection of CO2 peer footprint table: Durango Midstream, 2 facilities, 0.15M MT CO2e. Archer Daniels Midland, 1 facilities, 3.82M MT CO2e. Exxon Mobil, 1 facilities, 3.16M MT CO2e. Enbridge (us), 4 facilities, 0.73M MT CO2e. Lucid Energy Group II, 1 facilities, 0.57M MT CO2e. Targa Resources, 6 facilities, 0.41M MT CO2e. Stakeholder Gas Services, 2 facilities, 0.3M MT CO2e. Energy Transfer, 3 facilities, 0.21M MT CO2e. Red Trail Energy, 1 facilities, 0.09M MT CO2e. Contango Resources, 1 facilities, 0.07M MT CO2e. Pinon Midstream, 1 facilities, 0.07M MT CO2e. Oneok, 1 facilities, 0.06M MT CO2e. The Williams Cos, 1 facilities, 0.04M MT CO2e. Occidental Petroleum, 1 facilities, 0.04M MT CO2e. Core Energy, 1 facilities, 0.03M MT CO2e. Riverside Energy, 1 facilities, 0M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent durango-midstream · 2023 #860 · 149K MT
CO2E-MODEST · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-INJECTION-OF · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MODEST 149K MT
- MID-PACK #860/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Gepif III Lexington I… · Power Plants
- FAC-PAIR 2 facilities
- SPAN-HOME 1 state
- SECTOR-INJECTION-OF Injection of CO2
- TREND-SURGE +112% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Gepif III Lexington Investco · Power Plants (±116 MT)
Instrument codes from this parent’s EPA GHGRP rollup: CO₂e band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend, and book completeness. Not an EPA grade or compliance rating.
2023 methane-weighted parent mix
Methane leads the non-CO₂ share for Durango Midstream: CH₄ is 8.2% of 149K MT CO₂e in 2023 (N₂O 0%). Non-CO₂ gases total 8.3%. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 91.7%
- 136K MT
- CH₄
- 8.2%
- 12K MT
- N₂O
- 0%
- 74 MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Durango Midstream
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest facilities by reported emissions
Durango Midstream - top facilities (MT CO₂e)
Durango Midstream's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Emissions growth across reporting years
Durango Midstream - rising annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 149K MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Durango Midstream annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
Durango Midstream reported 149K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 70K MT in 2011 - a rise of 111.8% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Facilities (2)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| Maljamar Gas Plant Injection of CO2 Maljamar, NM | Maljamar, NM | 77K |
| Dagger Draw Gas Plant Injection of CO2 Artesia, NM | Artesia, NM | 72K |
Nationwide parents with similar GHGRP profiles
Three EPA GHGRP-derived peer sets for Durango Midstream. The CO₂e neighbourhood chart above shows poles; these links are navigable comparison paths beyond Injection of CO2 browse pages.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (149K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (2 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (74K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Durango Midstream's emissions profile
- Durango Midstream runs mid-intensity per facility (74K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Injection of CO2 sector on the Injection of CO2 industry page.
- It ranks #860 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Injection of CO2 emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.