EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Power Plants

Enery Holdings - lower-footprint GHGRP parent

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), a smaller reporting parent: 16K MT CO₂e from 1 site in 1 state (2023).

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
16K
Reporting facilities
1
States covered
1
Overall rank
#2145
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

16K MT CO₂e · 2023

According to the EPA GHGRP, Enery Holdings reported 16K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 1 facility in 1 state (ranks #2,145 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions decreased 91% over the tracked period.

  • Overall rank #2145 of 2,289
  • #424 in Power Plants
  • -90.9% since 2011

Enery Holdings vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

16,271 2145th of 2289 higher than 144 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Enery Holdings spreads its footprint vs Power Plants peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Power Plants companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (19 facilities, 26.77M MT).

Median split: 19 facilities, 26.77M MT CO₂e among Power Plants peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 01020304050 0M20M40M60M80M100M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Power Plants
Median split: 19 facilities, 26.77M MT CO₂e among Power Plants peers.

You are here: Enery Holdings.

Power Plants peer footprint table: Enery Holdings, 1 facilities, 0.02M MT CO2e. Vistra, 40 facilities, 86.32M MT CO2e. The Southern, 26 facilities, 78.01M MT CO2e. Duke Energy, 39 facilities, 65.01M MT CO2e. CPN Management, 43 facilities, 47.58M MT CO2e. Nextera Energy, 19 facilities, 45.57M MT CO2e. American Electric Power CO, 22 facilities, 44.72M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 27 facilities, 39.8M MT CO2e. US Government, 21 facilities, 38.21M MT CO2e. Entergy, 23 facilities, 33.86M MT CO2e. Xcel Energy, 28 facilities, 29.03M MT CO2e. PPL, 6 facilities, 26.77M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 22 facilities, 25.19M MT CO2e. DTE Energy, 12 facilities, 22.31M MT CO2e. NRG Energy, 14 facilities, 22.1M MT CO2e. Ameren, 11 facilities, 19.88M MT CO2e. Evergy, 12 facilities, 19.87M MT CO2e. Lightstone Generation, 4 facilities, 19.14M MT CO2e. Talen Energy, 11 facilities, 17.72M MT CO2e. Associated Electric Cooperative, 7 facilities, 15.57M MT CO2e. Aes, 8 facilities, 15.45M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent enery-holdings · 2023 #2145 · 16K MT

CO2E-THIN · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-SINGLE · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS · TREND-CUT · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-THIN 16K MT
  • BOTTOM-DECILE #2145/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH City of Casper Wyoming · Waste
  • FAC-SINGLE 1 facility
  • SPAN-HOME 1 state
  • SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS Power Plants
  • TREND-CUT −91% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: City of Casper Wyoming · Waste (±30 MT)

Lower-footprint parent stamps from this GHGRP rollup, comparative context only, not a compliance rating.

2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book

This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 16K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
99.9%
16K MT
CH₄
0%
8 MT
N₂O
0.1%
10 MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Enery Holdings

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MEnery Holdings · Power Plant…16KCity of Casper Wyoming · Was…16KCounty of Loudoun Vir… · Was…16KSekisui America · Other · ne…16KCity of Virginia Minn… · Nat…16KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Enery Holdings · May 2026

Emissions decline across reporting years

Enery Holdings - declining annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
16K MT
9 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0M0.05M0.1M0.15M0.2M 201120122013201420152016201720192023 0.02M

Enery Holdings annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Enery Holdings reported 16K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 178K MT in 2011 - a decline of 90.9% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Facilities (1)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
ICEGEN
Power Plants
CARSON, CA
16K

Nationwide peers for a lower-footprint parent

Comparison paths for a smaller GHGRP parent: nearest CO₂e totals, similar facility counts, and intensity neighbors beyond Power Plants browse pages.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Enery Holdings's emissions profile

  • Enery Holdings runs low-intensity per facility (16K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Power Plants sector on the Power Plants industry page.
  • It ranks #2145 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Power Plants emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.