EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Other

Fanjul - top-third GHGRP parent

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 3 facilities across 3 states (222K MT CO₂e in 2023).

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
222K
Reporting facilities
3
States covered
3
Overall rank
#698
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

222K MT CO₂e · 2023

According to the EPA GHGRP, Fanjul reported 222K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 3 facilities in 3 states (ranks #698 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions increased 6% over the tracked period.

  • Overall rank #698 of 2,289
  • #92 in Other
  • +5.9% since 2011

Fanjul vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

222,178 698th of 2289 higher than 1,591 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Fanjul spreads its footprint vs Other peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Other companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 2.28M MT).

Median split: 5 facilities, 2.28M MT CO₂e among Other peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 0204060 0M5M10M15M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Other
Median split: 5 facilities, 2.28M MT CO₂e among Other peers.

You are here: Fanjul.

Other peer footprint table: Fanjul, 3 facilities, 0.22M MT CO2e. Prairie State Energy Campus Management, 1 facilities, 11.46M MT CO2e. Marathon Petroleum, 4 facilities, 7.11M MT CO2e. Archer Daniels Midland, 15 facilities, 6.67M MT CO2e. Consol Energy, 4 facilities, 6.53M MT CO2e. American Consolidated Natural Resources, 6 facilities, 6.29M MT CO2e. Hummel Station, 1 facilities, 2.91M MT CO2e. Arch Resources, 5 facilities, 2.83M MT CO2e. US Government, 51 facilities, 2.78M MT CO2e. Poet, 28 facilities, 2.66M MT CO2e. Cargill, 27 facilities, 2.51M MT CO2e. Alliance Holdings Gp, 5 facilities, 2.28M MT CO2e. Valero Energy, 12 facilities, 2.24M MT CO2e. Tyson Foods, 31 facilities, 1.72M MT CO2e. Iron Senergy Holding, 1 facilities, 1.64M MT CO2e. Karnavati Holdings, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. Hatfield Metallurgical Intermediate Holdings, 1 facilities, 1.38M MT CO2e. Alpha Metallurgical Resources, 9 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e. Hallador Energy, 2 facilities, 1.32M MT CO2e. Green Plains, 11 facilities, 1.3M MT CO2e. Coronado Group, 3 facilities, 1.28M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent fanjul · 2023 #698 · 222K MT

CO2E-MODEST · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-PAIR · SECTOR-OTHER · TREND-UP · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-MODEST 222K MT
  • MID-PACK #698/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH American Honda Motor… · Other
  • FAC-PAIR 3 facilities
  • SPAN-PAIR 3 states
  • SECTOR-OTHER Other
  • TREND-UP +6% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: American Honda Motor CO · Other (±1K MT)

Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.

2023 nitrous-weighted parent mix

Nitrous oxide leads the non-CO₂ share: N₂O is 4.8% of 222K MT CO₂e in 2023 (CH₄ 3.1%). Non-CO₂ gases total 7.9%. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
92.1%
205K MT
CH₄
3.1%
7K MT
N₂O
4.8%
11K MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Fanjul

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MFanjul · Other · this parent222KAmerican Honda Motor… · Othe…221KLeprino Foods · Other · near221KGranite Shore Power · Power …221KCity of Greensboro No… · Was…220KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Fanjul · May 2026

Largest sites in a top-third parent book

Fanjul - top sites (MT CO₂e)

American Sugar Refining, Inc…109KAmerican Sugar Refining, Inc…76KNEW HOPE POWER COMPANY38K

Fanjul's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

High-emitter reporting timeline

Fanjul - high-emitter annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
222K MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0.2M0.22M0.24M0.26M0.28M0.3M 2011201320152017201920212023 0.22M

Fanjul annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Fanjul reported 222K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 210K MT in 2011 - a rise of 5.9% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Multi-site facilities (3)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
American Sugar Refining, Inc. - Baltimore Refinery
Other
BALTIMORE, MD
109K
American Sugar Refining, Inc. - Yonkers Refinery
Other
Yonkers, NY
76K
NEW HOPE POWER COMPANY
Power Plants
SOUTH BAY, FL
38K

Where Fanjul's reported CO₂e sits by state

48.9% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Maryland (1 site) ; next is New York at 34.1% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.

MD109KNY76KFL38K
EPA GHGRP · Fanjul facility CO₂e by state · May 2026

Fanjul reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Fanjul's reported CO₂e by EPA sector

Top sector Other is 83% of this parent's facility CO₂e (2 sites) ; Power Plants follows at 17% . Sector labels are EPA GHGRP facility industry_sector values.

Other184KPower Plants38K
EPA GHGRP · Fanjul facility CO₂e by sector · May 2026

Fanjul reported facility CO₂e by EPA industry sector

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent

Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (222K MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Fanjul's emissions profile

  • Fanjul runs mid-intensity per facility (74K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Other sector on the Other industry page.
  • It ranks #698 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Other emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.