EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Metals

Gramercy Holdings I - top-third GHGRP parent

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 1 facility across 1 state (803K MT CO₂e in 2023).

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
803K
Reporting facilities
1
States covered
1
Overall rank
#379
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

803K MT CO₂e · 2023

According to the EPA GHGRP, Gramercy Holdings I reported 803K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 1 facility in 1 state (ranks #379 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions remained broadly stable over the tracked period.

  • Overall rank #379 of 2,289
  • #12 in Metals
  • +5.0% since 2011

Gramercy Holdings I vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

802,950 379th of 2289 higher than 1,910 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Gramercy Holdings I spreads its footprint vs Metals peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 20 Metals companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (4 facilities, 0.84M MT).

Median split: 4 facilities, 0.84M MT CO₂e among Metals peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 20 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 0102030 0M10M20M30M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Metals
Median split: 4 facilities, 0.84M MT CO₂e among Metals peers.

You are here: Gramercy Holdings I.

Metals peer footprint table: Gramercy Holdings I, 1 facilities, 0.8M MT CO2e. Cleveland-Cliffs, 26 facilities, 27.37M MT CO2e. US Steel, 13 facilities, 19.41M MT CO2e. Nucor, 24 facilities, 5.57M MT CO2e. Alcoa, 3 facilities, 5.16M MT CO2e. Suncoke Energy, 5 facilities, 3.27M MT CO2e. Steel Dynamics, 10 facilities, 2.54M MT CO2e. Century Aluminum, 3 facilities, 0.99M MT CO2e. Globe Specialty Metals, 4 facilities, 0.92M MT CO2e. Commercial Metals, 8 facilities, 0.86M MT CO2e. Gerdau USA, 9 facilities, 0.84M MT CO2e. Ssab US Holding, 2 facilities, 0.63M MT CO2e. Novelis, 6 facilities, 0.63M MT CO2e. Arconic, 4 facilities, 0.63M MT CO2e. Arcelormittal Holdings, 2 facilities, 0.62M MT CO2e. Am/ns Calvert, 1 facilities, 0.56M MT CO2e. Bluescope Steel Investments, 1 facilities, 0.44M MT CO2e. Pinnacle Mountain Holding Co III, 1 facilities, 0.38M MT CO2e. Proterial America, 2 facilities, 0.38M MT CO2e. Magnitude 7 Metals, 1 facilities, 0.38M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent gramercy-holdings-i · 2023 #379 · 803K MT

CO2E-MODEST · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-SINGLE · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-METALS · TREND-UP · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-MODEST 803K MT
  • UPPER-Q #379/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH Bayer US Holding · Chemicals
  • FAC-SINGLE 1 facility
  • SPAN-HOME 1 state
  • SECTOR-METALS Metals
  • TREND-UP +5% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: Bayer US Holding · Chemicals (±521 MT)

Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.

2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book

This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 803K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
99.9%
802K MT
CH₄
0%
378 MT
N₂O
0.1%
451 MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Gramercy Holdings I

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MMatheson Tri-Gas · Chemicals…805KBayer US Holding · Chemicals…803KGramercy Holdings I · Metals…803KCardinal Glass Indust… · Min…799KMunicipal Energy Agen… · Pow…799KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Gramercy Holdings I · May 2026

High-emitter reporting timeline

Gramercy Holdings I - high-emitter annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
803K MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0.7M0.75M0.8M0.85M0.9M 2011201320152017201920212023 0.8M

Gramercy Holdings I annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Gramercy Holdings I reported 803K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 765K MT in 2011 - a rise of 5.0% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Facilities (1)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
ATLANTIC ALUMINA, GRAMERCY OPERATIONS
Metals
GRAMERCY, LA
803K

Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent

Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (803K MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Gramercy Holdings I's emissions profile

  • Gramercy Holdings I runs high-intensity per facility (803K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Metals sector on the Metals industry page.
  • It ranks #379 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Metals emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.