EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Power Plants
Great Plains Energy Services - per-facility CO₂e intensity
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), Scope 1 emissions reported across 3 reporting facilities in 2 states.
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 120K
- Reporting facilities
- 3
- States covered
- 2
- Overall rank
- #967
Data updated May 2026
Great Plains Energy Services averages 40K MT CO₂e per reporting facility (low-intensity NTILE) on 120K MT total in 2023.
- Overall rank #967 of 2,289
- #309 in Power Plants
- +2038.7% since 2011
Great Plains Energy Services vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
119,911 967th of 2289 higher than 1,322 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Great Plains Energy Services spreads its footprint vs Power Plants peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Power Plants companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (19 facilities, 26.77M MT).
You are here: Great Plains Energy Services.
Power Plants peer footprint table: Great Plains Energy Services, 3 facilities, 0.12M MT CO2e. Vistra, 40 facilities, 86.32M MT CO2e. The Southern, 26 facilities, 78.01M MT CO2e. Duke Energy, 39 facilities, 65.01M MT CO2e. CPN Management, 43 facilities, 47.58M MT CO2e. Nextera Energy, 19 facilities, 45.57M MT CO2e. American Electric Power CO, 22 facilities, 44.72M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 27 facilities, 39.8M MT CO2e. US Government, 21 facilities, 38.21M MT CO2e. Entergy, 23 facilities, 33.86M MT CO2e. Xcel Energy, 28 facilities, 29.03M MT CO2e. PPL, 6 facilities, 26.77M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 22 facilities, 25.19M MT CO2e. DTE Energy, 12 facilities, 22.31M MT CO2e. NRG Energy, 14 facilities, 22.1M MT CO2e. Ameren, 11 facilities, 19.88M MT CO2e. Evergy, 12 facilities, 19.87M MT CO2e. Lightstone Generation, 4 facilities, 19.14M MT CO2e. Talen Energy, 11 facilities, 17.72M MT CO2e. Associated Electric Cooperative, 7 facilities, 15.57M MT CO2e. Aes, 8 facilities, 15.45M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent great-plains-energy-services · 2023 #967 · 120K MT
CO2E-MODEST · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-PAIR · SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MODEST 120K MT
- MID-PACK #967/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH The Renco Group · Metals
- FAC-PAIR 3 facilities
- SPAN-PAIR 2 states
- SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS Power Plants
- TREND-SURGE +2039% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: The Renco Group · Metals (±88 MT)
Instrument codes from this parent’s EPA GHGRP rollup: CO₂e band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend, and book completeness. Not an EPA grade or compliance rating.
2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book
This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.8% of 120K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.2%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 99.8%
- 120K MT
- CH₄
- 0.1%
- 79 MT
- N₂O
- 0.1%
- 148 MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Great Plains Energy Services
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest facilities by reported emissions
Great Plains Energy Services - top facilities (MT CO₂e)
Great Plains Energy Services's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Emissions growth across reporting years
Great Plains Energy Services - rising annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 120K MT
- 6 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Great Plains Energy Services annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
Great Plains Energy Services reported 120K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 6K MT in 2011 - a rise of 2038.7% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Multi-site facilities (3)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| Ralph Green Generating Station Power Plants PLEASANT HILL, MO | PLEASANT HILL, MO | 49K |
| Northeast Generating Station Power Plants KANSAS CITY, MO | KANSAS CITY, MO | 45K |
| Osawatomie Generating Station Power Plants OSAWATOMIE, KS | OSAWATOMIE, KS | 26K |
Where Great Plains Energy Services's reported CO₂e sits by state
78% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Missouri (2 sites) ; next is Kansas at 22% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.
Great Plains Energy Services reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state
Nationwide parents with similar GHGRP profiles
Three EPA GHGRP-derived peer sets for Great Plains Energy Services. The CO₂e neighbourhood chart above shows poles; these links are navigable comparison paths beyond Power Plants browse pages.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (120K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (3 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (40K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Great Plains Energy Services's emissions profile
- Great Plains Energy Services runs low-intensity per facility (40K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Power Plants sector on the Power Plants industry page.
- It ranks #967 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Power Plants emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.