EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Power Plants

Jera Americas Holdings - rising reported GHG

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), Scope 1 emissions reported across 1 reporting facility in 1 state.

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
60K
Reporting facilities
1
States covered
1
Overall rank
#1417
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

60K MT CO₂e · 2023

Jera Americas Holdings reported emissions rose 13.1% since 2011 to 60K MT CO₂e in 2023.

  • Overall rank #1417 of 2,289
  • #349 in Power Plants
  • +13.1% since 2011

Jera Americas Holdings vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

59,861 1417th of 2289 higher than 872 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Jera Americas Holdings spreads its footprint vs Power Plants peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Power Plants companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (19 facilities, 26.77M MT).

Median split: 19 facilities, 26.77M MT CO₂e among Power Plants peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 01020304050 0M20M40M60M80M100M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Power Plants
Median split: 19 facilities, 26.77M MT CO₂e among Power Plants peers.

You are here: Jera Americas Holdings.

Power Plants peer footprint table: Jera Americas Holdings, 1 facilities, 0.06M MT CO2e. Vistra, 40 facilities, 86.32M MT CO2e. The Southern, 26 facilities, 78.01M MT CO2e. Duke Energy, 39 facilities, 65.01M MT CO2e. CPN Management, 43 facilities, 47.58M MT CO2e. Nextera Energy, 19 facilities, 45.57M MT CO2e. American Electric Power CO, 22 facilities, 44.72M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 27 facilities, 39.8M MT CO2e. US Government, 21 facilities, 38.21M MT CO2e. Entergy, 23 facilities, 33.86M MT CO2e. Xcel Energy, 28 facilities, 29.03M MT CO2e. PPL, 6 facilities, 26.77M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 22 facilities, 25.19M MT CO2e. DTE Energy, 12 facilities, 22.31M MT CO2e. NRG Energy, 14 facilities, 22.1M MT CO2e. Ameren, 11 facilities, 19.88M MT CO2e. Evergy, 12 facilities, 19.87M MT CO2e. Lightstone Generation, 4 facilities, 19.14M MT CO2e. Talen Energy, 11 facilities, 17.72M MT CO2e. Associated Electric Cooperative, 7 facilities, 15.57M MT CO2e. Aes, 8 facilities, 15.45M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent jera-americas-holdings · 2023 #1417 · 60K MT

CO2E-THIN · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-SINGLE · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS · TREND-UP · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-THIN 60K MT
  • MID-PACK #1417/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH Temple University of… · Other
  • FAC-SINGLE 1 facility
  • SPAN-HOME 1 state
  • SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS Power Plants
  • TREND-UP +13% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: Temple University of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education · Other (±46 MT)

Instrument codes from this parent’s EPA GHGRP rollup: CO₂e band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend, and book completeness. Not an EPA grade or compliance rating.

2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book

This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.7% of 60K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.3%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
99.7%
60K MT
CH₄
0.1%
48 MT
N₂O
0.2%
103 MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Jera Americas Holdings

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MMerit Energy CO · Petroleum …60KCooper River Partners · Powe…60KTemple University of… · Othe…60KJera Americas Holdings · Pow…60KTexas International R… · Pet…60KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Jera Americas Holdings · May 2026

Emissions growth across reporting years

Jera Americas Holdings - rising annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
60K MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0M0.1M0.2M0.3M0.4M 2011201320152017201920212023 0.06M

Jera Americas Holdings annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Jera Americas Holdings reported 60K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 53K MT in 2011 - a rise of 13.1% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Facilities (1)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
Canal Station
Power Plants
SANDWICH, MA
60K

Nationwide parents with similar GHGRP profiles

Three EPA GHGRP-derived peer sets for Jera Americas Holdings. The CO₂e neighbourhood chart above shows poles; these links are navigable comparison paths beyond Power Plants browse pages.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Jera Americas Holdings's emissions profile

  • Jera Americas Holdings runs mid-intensity per facility (60K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Power Plants sector on the Power Plants industry page.
  • It ranks #1417 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Power Plants emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.