EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems

Landreth CO Stockholders - lower-footprint GHGRP parent

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), a smaller reporting parent: 22K MT CO₂e from 1 site in 1 state (2023).

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
22K
Reporting facilities
1
States covered
1
Overall rank
#2073
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

22K MT CO₂e · 2023

According to the EPA GHGRP, Landreth CO Stockholders reported 22K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 1 facility in 1 state (ranks #2,073 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions decreased 38% over the tracked period.

  • Overall rank #2073 of 2,289
  • #139 in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
  • -37.6% since 2011

Landreth CO Stockholders vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

21,862 2073rd of 2289 higher than 216 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Landreth CO Stockholders spreads its footprint vs Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (21 facilities, 2.77M MT).

Median split: 21 facilities, 2.77M MT CO₂e among Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 050100150200 0M5M10M15M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Median split: 21 facilities, 2.77M MT CO₂e among Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers.

You are here: Landreth CO Stockholders.

Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peer footprint table: Landreth CO Stockholders, 1 facilities, 0.02M MT CO2e. Cheniere Energy, 5 facilities, 9.73M MT CO2e. Energy Transfer, 129 facilities, 8.89M MT CO2e. Hilcorp Energy, 18 facilities, 8.26M MT CO2e. Kinder Morgan, 169 facilities, 8.24M MT CO2e. Enterprise Products Partners, 43 facilities, 7.79M MT CO2e. Enbridge (us), 80 facilities, 5.72M MT CO2e. The Williams Cos, 59 facilities, 5.48M MT CO2e. Transcanada Pipeline USA, 76 facilities, 4.45M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 5 facilities, 3.26M MT CO2e. Venture Global LNG, 1 facilities, 2.84M MT CO2e. Sempra Energy, 5 facilities, 2.77M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 56 facilities, 2.3M MT CO2e. Targa Resources, 21 facilities, 2.22M MT CO2e. GIP Pilot Acquisition Partners, 26 facilities, 2.08M MT CO2e. Loews, 41 facilities, 1.94M MT CO2e. Occidental Petroleum, 19 facilities, 1.55M MT CO2e. Enlink Midstream, 11 facilities, 1.5M MT CO2e. Oneok, 23 facilities, 1.44M MT CO2e. Ecoelectrica, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. IKAV Impact USA, 4 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent landreth-co-stockholders · 2023 #2073 · 22K MT

CO2E-THIN · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-SINGLE · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN · TREND-CUT · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-THIN 22K MT
  • BOTTOM-DECILE #2073/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH US Mineral Products CO · Minerals
  • FAC-SINGLE 1 facility
  • SPAN-HOME 1 state
  • SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN Petroleum and Nat…
  • TREND-CUT −38% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: US Mineral Products CO · Minerals (±41 MT)

Lower-footprint parent stamps from this GHGRP rollup, comparative context only, not a compliance rating.

2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book

This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (98.8% of 22K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 1.2%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
98.8%
22K MT
CH₄
1.2%
262 MT
N₂O
0.1%
12 MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Landreth CO Stockholders

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MKeymark · Metals · near22KWellhead Electric · Power Pl…22KUS Mineral Products CO · Min…22KLandreth CO Stockhold… · Pet…22KColumbia County Georg… · Was…22KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Landreth CO Stockholders · May 2026

Emissions decline across reporting years

Landreth CO Stockholders - declining annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
22K MT
11 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0M0.01M0.02M0.03M0.04M0.05M 20112012201320142015201620192020202120222023 0.02M

Landreth CO Stockholders annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Landreth CO Stockholders reported 22K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 35K MT in 2011 - a decline of 37.6% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Facilities (1)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
North Hobbs Reinjection Compression Facility (RCF) and West Injection Battery (WIB)
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Hobbs, NM
22K

Nationwide peers for a lower-footprint parent

Comparison paths for a smaller GHGRP parent: nearest CO₂e totals, similar facility counts, and intensity neighbors beyond Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems browse pages.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Landreth CO Stockholders's emissions profile

  • Landreth CO Stockholders runs low-intensity per facility (22K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems sector on the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems industry page.
  • It ranks #2073 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.