EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Injection of CO2
Lucid Energy Group II - top-third GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 1 facility across 1 state (573K MT CO₂e in 2023).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 573K
- Reporting facilities
- 1
- States covered
- 1
- Overall rank
- #441
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, Lucid Energy Group II reported 573K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 1 facility in 1 state (ranks #441 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions increased 1443% over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #441 of 2,289
- #2 in Injection of CO2
- +1443.1% since 2013
Lucid Energy Group II vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
572,876 441st of 2289 higher than 1,848 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Lucid Energy Group II spreads its footprint vs Injection of CO2 peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 16 Injection of CO2 companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (1 facilities, 0.15M MT).
You are here: Lucid Energy Group II.
Injection of CO2 peer footprint table: Lucid Energy Group II, 1 facilities, 0.57M MT CO2e. Archer Daniels Midland, 1 facilities, 3.82M MT CO2e. Exxon Mobil, 1 facilities, 3.16M MT CO2e. Enbridge (us), 4 facilities, 0.73M MT CO2e. Targa Resources, 6 facilities, 0.41M MT CO2e. Stakeholder Gas Services, 2 facilities, 0.3M MT CO2e. Energy Transfer, 3 facilities, 0.21M MT CO2e. Durango Midstream, 2 facilities, 0.15M MT CO2e. Red Trail Energy, 1 facilities, 0.09M MT CO2e. Contango Resources, 1 facilities, 0.07M MT CO2e. Pinon Midstream, 1 facilities, 0.07M MT CO2e. Oneok, 1 facilities, 0.06M MT CO2e. The Williams Cos, 1 facilities, 0.04M MT CO2e. Occidental Petroleum, 1 facilities, 0.04M MT CO2e. Core Energy, 1 facilities, 0.03M MT CO2e. Riverside Energy, 1 facilities, 0M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent lucid-energy-group-ii · 2023 #441 · 573K MT
CO2E-MODEST · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-SINGLE · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-INJECTION-OF · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MODEST 573K MT
- UPPER-Q #441/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH General Motors · Metals
- FAC-SINGLE 1 facility
- SPAN-HOME 1 state
- SECTOR-INJECTION-OF Injection of CO2
- TREND-SURGE +1443% since 2013
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: General Motors · Metals (±705 MT)
Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.
2023 methane-weighted parent mix
Methane leads the non-CO₂ share for Lucid Energy Group II: CH₄ is 2.7% of 573K MT CO₂e in 2023 (N₂O 0%). Non-CO₂ gases total 2.8%. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 97.2%
- 557K MT
- CH₄
- 2.7%
- 16K MT
- N₂O
- 0%
- 160 MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Lucid Energy Group II
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Emissions growth across reporting years
Lucid Energy Group II - rising annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2013–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 573K MT
- 11 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Lucid Energy Group II annual reported GHG emissions, 2013–2023
Lucid Energy Group II reported 573K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 37K MT in 2013 - a rise of 1443.1% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Facilities (1)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hills Gas Processing Plant Injection of CO2 Jal, NM | Jal, NM | 573K |
Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent
Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (573K MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (573K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (1 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (573K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Lucid Energy Group II's emissions profile
- Lucid Energy Group II runs high-intensity per facility (573K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Injection of CO2 sector on the Injection of CO2 industry page.
- It ranks #441 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Injection of CO2 emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.