EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Other
Minerals Technologies - declining reported GHG
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), Scope 1 emissions reported across 2 reporting facilities in 2 states.
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 157K
- Reporting facilities
- 2
- States covered
- 2
- Overall rank
- #837
Data updated May 2026
Minerals Technologies reported emissions fell 36.5% since 2011 to 157K MT CO₂e in 2023.
- Overall rank #837 of 2,289
- #138 in Other
- -36.5% since 2011
Minerals Technologies vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
157,395 837th of 2289 higher than 1,452 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Minerals Technologies spreads its footprint vs Other peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Other companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 2.28M MT).
You are here: Minerals Technologies.
Other peer footprint table: Minerals Technologies, 2 facilities, 0.16M MT CO2e. Prairie State Energy Campus Management, 1 facilities, 11.46M MT CO2e. Marathon Petroleum, 4 facilities, 7.11M MT CO2e. Archer Daniels Midland, 15 facilities, 6.67M MT CO2e. Consol Energy, 4 facilities, 6.53M MT CO2e. American Consolidated Natural Resources, 6 facilities, 6.29M MT CO2e. Hummel Station, 1 facilities, 2.91M MT CO2e. Arch Resources, 5 facilities, 2.83M MT CO2e. US Government, 51 facilities, 2.78M MT CO2e. Poet, 28 facilities, 2.66M MT CO2e. Cargill, 27 facilities, 2.51M MT CO2e. Alliance Holdings Gp, 5 facilities, 2.28M MT CO2e. Valero Energy, 12 facilities, 2.24M MT CO2e. Tyson Foods, 31 facilities, 1.72M MT CO2e. Iron Senergy Holding, 1 facilities, 1.64M MT CO2e. Karnavati Holdings, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. Hatfield Metallurgical Intermediate Holdings, 1 facilities, 1.38M MT CO2e. Alpha Metallurgical Resources, 9 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e. Hallador Energy, 2 facilities, 1.32M MT CO2e. Green Plains, 11 facilities, 1.3M MT CO2e. Coronado Group, 3 facilities, 1.28M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent minerals-technologies · 2023 #837 · 157K MT
CO2E-MODEST · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-PAIR · SECTOR-OTHER · TREND-CUT · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MODEST 157K MT
- MID-PACK #837/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Allete · Power Plants
- FAC-PAIR 2 facilities
- SPAN-PAIR 2 states
- SECTOR-OTHER Other
- TREND-CUT −37% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Allete · Power Plants (±279 MT)
Instrument codes from this parent’s EPA GHGRP rollup: CO₂e band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend, and book completeness. Not an EPA grade or compliance rating.
2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book
This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 157K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 99.9%
- 157K MT
- CH₄
- 0%
- 51 MT
- N₂O
- 0%
- 70 MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Minerals Technologies
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest facilities by reported emissions
Minerals Technologies - top facilities (MT CO₂e)
Minerals Technologies's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Emissions decline across reporting years
Minerals Technologies - declining annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 157K MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Minerals Technologies annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
Minerals Technologies reported 157K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 248K MT in 2011 - a decline of 36.5% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Facilities (2)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| SPECIALTY MINERALS Minerals ADAMS, MA | ADAMS, MA | 104K |
| AMERICAN COLLOID Other Colony, WY | Colony, WY | 53K |
Where Minerals Technologies's reported CO₂e sits by state
66.3% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Massachusetts (1 site) ; next is Wyoming at 33.7% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.
Minerals Technologies reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state
Minerals Technologies's reported CO₂e by EPA sector
Top sector Minerals is 66.3% of this parent's facility CO₂e (1 site) ; Other follows at 33.7% . Sector labels are EPA GHGRP facility industry_sector values.
Minerals Technologies reported facility CO₂e by EPA industry sector
Nationwide parents with similar GHGRP profiles
Three EPA GHGRP-derived peer sets for Minerals Technologies. The CO₂e neighbourhood chart above shows poles; these links are navigable comparison paths beyond Other browse pages.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (157K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (2 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (79K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Minerals Technologies's emissions profile
- Minerals Technologies runs mid-intensity per facility (79K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Other sector on the Other industry page.
- It ranks #837 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Other emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.