EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Waste

Mip IV Boomerang Holdings - declining reported GHG

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), Scope 1 emissions reported across 1 reporting facility in 1 state.

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
98K
Reporting facilities
1
States covered
1
Overall rank
#1083
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

98K MT CO₂e · 2023

Mip IV Boomerang Holdings reported emissions fell 45.6% since 2011 to 98K MT CO₂e in 2023.

  • Overall rank #1083 of 2,289
  • #186 in Waste
  • -45.6% since 2011

Mip IV Boomerang Holdings vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

97,740 1083rd of 2289 higher than 1,206 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Mip IV Boomerang Holdings spreads its footprint vs Waste peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Waste companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 0.7M MT).

Median split: 5 facilities, 0.7M MT CO₂e among Waste peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 050100150200250 0M5M10M15M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Waste
Median split: 5 facilities, 0.7M MT CO₂e among Waste peers.

You are here: Mip IV Boomerang Holdings.

Waste peer footprint table: Mip IV Boomerang Holdings, 1 facilities, 0.1M MT CO2e. Waste Management, 225 facilities, 11.65M MT CO2e. Republic Services, 177 facilities, 10.72M MT CO2e. Covanta Holding, 22 facilities, 4.2M MT CO2e. Waste Connections US, 40 facilities, 3.63M MT CO2e. Gfl Environmental Holdings (us), 30 facilities, 2.45M MT CO2e. Wheelabrator Technologies Holdings, 12 facilities, 2.22M MT CO2e. Rumpke Consolidated Cos, 9 facilities, 1.69M MT CO2e. County of Orange California, 5 facilities, 1.13M MT CO2e. County of Lycoming Pennsylvania, 1 facilities, 0.9M MT CO2e. County of Pinellas Florida, 2 facilities, 0.77M MT CO2e. Apex Environmental, 1 facilities, 0.7M MT CO2e. County of Brevard Florida, 1 facilities, 0.67M MT CO2e. City of El Paso Texas, 2 facilities, 0.54M MT CO2e. Waste Connections, 8 facilities, 0.51M MT CO2e. City of Baton Rouge Louisiana, 2 facilities, 0.51M MT CO2e. Solid Waste Authority of Palm Beach County Florida, 3 facilities, 0.5M MT CO2e. City of Dallas Texas, 1 facilities, 0.48M MT CO2e. Casella Waste Systems, 9 facilities, 0.46M MT CO2e. County of Polk Florida, 1 facilities, 0.43M MT CO2e. US Government, 9 facilities, 0.42M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent mip-iv-boomerang-holdings · 2023 #1083 · 98K MT

CO2E-THIN · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-SINGLE · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-WASTE · TREND-CUT · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-THIN 98K MT
  • MID-PACK #1083/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH City of Grand Forks N… · Waste
  • FAC-SINGLE 1 facility
  • SPAN-HOME 1 state
  • SECTOR-WASTE Waste
  • TREND-CUT −46% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: City of Grand Forks North Dakota · Waste (±77 MT)

Instrument codes from this parent’s EPA GHGRP rollup: CO₂e band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend, and book completeness. Not an EPA grade or compliance rating.

2023 nitrous-weighted parent mix

Nitrous oxide leads the non-CO₂ share: N₂O is 3.6% of 98K MT CO₂e in 2023 (CH₄ 2.3%). Non-CO₂ gases total 5.9%. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
94.1%
92K MT
CH₄
2.3%
2K MT
N₂O
3.6%
4K MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Mip IV Boomerang Holdings

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MMip IV Boomerang Hold… · Was…98KCity of Grand Forks N… · Was…98KCounty of Roanoke Vir… · Was…98KRepublic Steel · Metals · ne…98KUniversity of Maryland · Oth…97KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Mip IV Boomerang Holdings · May 2026

Emissions decline across reporting years

Mip IV Boomerang Holdings - declining annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
98K MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0.05M0.1M0.15M0.2M0.25M 2011201320152017201920212023 0.1M

Mip IV Boomerang Holdings annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Mip IV Boomerang Holdings reported 98K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 180K MT in 2011 - a decline of 45.6% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Facilities (1)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
Wheelabrator Portsmouth Inc.
Waste
PORTSMOUTH, VA
98K

Nationwide parents with similar GHGRP profiles

Three EPA GHGRP-derived peer sets for Mip IV Boomerang Holdings. The CO₂e neighbourhood chart above shows poles; these links are navigable comparison paths beyond Waste browse pages.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Mip IV Boomerang Holdings's emissions profile

  • Mip IV Boomerang Holdings runs mid-intensity per facility (98K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Waste sector on the Waste industry page.
  • It ranks #1083 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Waste emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.