EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems

New Jersey Resources - lower-footprint GHGRP parent

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), a smaller reporting parent: 33K MT CO₂e from 1 site in 1 state (2023).

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
33K
Reporting facilities
1
States covered
1
Overall rank
#1819
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

33K MT CO₂e · 2023

According to the EPA GHGRP, New Jersey Resources reported 33K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 1 facility in 1 state (ranks #1,819 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions increased 11% over the tracked period.

  • Overall rank #1819 of 2,289
  • #124 in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
  • +11.3% since 2014

New Jersey Resources vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

33,112 1819th of 2289 higher than 470 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How New Jersey Resources spreads its footprint vs Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (21 facilities, 2.77M MT).

Median split: 21 facilities, 2.77M MT CO₂e among Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 050100150200 0M5M10M15M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Median split: 21 facilities, 2.77M MT CO₂e among Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers.

You are here: New Jersey Resources.

Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peer footprint table: New Jersey Resources, 1 facilities, 0.03M MT CO2e. Cheniere Energy, 5 facilities, 9.73M MT CO2e. Energy Transfer, 129 facilities, 8.89M MT CO2e. Hilcorp Energy, 18 facilities, 8.26M MT CO2e. Kinder Morgan, 169 facilities, 8.24M MT CO2e. Enterprise Products Partners, 43 facilities, 7.79M MT CO2e. Enbridge (us), 80 facilities, 5.72M MT CO2e. The Williams Cos, 59 facilities, 5.48M MT CO2e. Transcanada Pipeline USA, 76 facilities, 4.45M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 5 facilities, 3.26M MT CO2e. Venture Global LNG, 1 facilities, 2.84M MT CO2e. Sempra Energy, 5 facilities, 2.77M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 56 facilities, 2.3M MT CO2e. Targa Resources, 21 facilities, 2.22M MT CO2e. GIP Pilot Acquisition Partners, 26 facilities, 2.08M MT CO2e. Loews, 41 facilities, 1.94M MT CO2e. Occidental Petroleum, 19 facilities, 1.55M MT CO2e. Enlink Midstream, 11 facilities, 1.5M MT CO2e. Oneok, 23 facilities, 1.44M MT CO2e. Ecoelectrica, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. IKAV Impact USA, 4 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent new-jersey-resources · 2023 #1819 · 33K MT

CO2E-THIN · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-SINGLE · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN · TREND-UP · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-THIN 33K MT
  • LOWER-Q #1819/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH City of Vermillion So… · Waste
  • FAC-SINGLE 1 facility
  • SPAN-HOME 1 state
  • SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN Petroleum and Nat…
  • TREND-UP +11% since 2014
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: City of Vermillion South Dakota · Waste (±20 MT)

Lower-footprint parent stamps from this GHGRP rollup, comparative context only, not a compliance rating.

2023 methane-weighted parent mix

Methane leads the non-CO₂ share for New Jersey Resources: CH₄ is 32.5% of 33K MT CO₂e in 2023 (N₂O 0%). Non-CO₂ gases total 32.6%. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
67.4%
22K MT
CH₄
32.5%
11K MT
N₂O
0%
13 MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around New Jersey Resources

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MNew Jersey Resources · Petro…33KCity of Vermillion So… · Was…33KNapa Vallego Waste Ma… · Was…33KLittle Rapids · Pulp and Pa……33KWayne State University · Oth…33KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around New Jersey Resources · May 2026

Emissions growth across reporting years

New Jersey Resources - rising annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2014–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
33K MT
10 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0.02M0.02M0.03M0.03M0.04M0.04M0.05M 2014201520162017201820192020202120222023 0.03M

New Jersey Resources annual reported GHG emissions, 2014–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

New Jersey Resources reported 33K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 30K MT in 2014 - a rise of 11.3% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Facilities (1)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
Leaf River Energy Center, LLC
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Taylorsville, MS
33K

Nationwide peers for a lower-footprint parent

Comparison paths for a smaller GHGRP parent: nearest CO₂e totals, similar facility counts, and intensity neighbors beyond Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems browse pages.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using New Jersey Resources's emissions profile

  • New Jersey Resources runs low-intensity per facility (33K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems sector on the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems industry page.
  • It ranks #1819 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.