EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Power Plants

North Carolina Electric Membership - declining reported GHG

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), Scope 1 emissions reported across 2 reporting facilities in 1 state.

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
96K
Reporting facilities
2
States covered
1
Overall rank
#1092
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

96K MT CO₂e · 2023

North Carolina Electric Membership reported emissions fell 52.6% since 2011 to 96K MT CO₂e in 2023.

  • Overall rank #1092 of 2,289
  • #316 in Power Plants
  • -52.6% since 2011

North Carolina Electric Membership vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

96,430 1092nd of 2289 higher than 1,197 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How North Carolina Electric Membership spreads its footprint vs Power Plants peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Power Plants companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (19 facilities, 26.77M MT).

Median split: 19 facilities, 26.77M MT CO₂e among Power Plants peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 01020304050 0M20M40M60M80M100M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Power Plants
Median split: 19 facilities, 26.77M MT CO₂e among Power Plants peers.

You are here: North Carolina Electric Membership.

Power Plants peer footprint table: North Carolina Electric Membership, 2 facilities, 0.1M MT CO2e. Vistra, 40 facilities, 86.32M MT CO2e. The Southern, 26 facilities, 78.01M MT CO2e. Duke Energy, 39 facilities, 65.01M MT CO2e. CPN Management, 43 facilities, 47.58M MT CO2e. Nextera Energy, 19 facilities, 45.57M MT CO2e. American Electric Power CO, 22 facilities, 44.72M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 27 facilities, 39.8M MT CO2e. US Government, 21 facilities, 38.21M MT CO2e. Entergy, 23 facilities, 33.86M MT CO2e. Xcel Energy, 28 facilities, 29.03M MT CO2e. PPL, 6 facilities, 26.77M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 22 facilities, 25.19M MT CO2e. DTE Energy, 12 facilities, 22.31M MT CO2e. NRG Energy, 14 facilities, 22.1M MT CO2e. Ameren, 11 facilities, 19.88M MT CO2e. Evergy, 12 facilities, 19.87M MT CO2e. Lightstone Generation, 4 facilities, 19.14M MT CO2e. Talen Energy, 11 facilities, 17.72M MT CO2e. Associated Electric Cooperative, 7 facilities, 15.57M MT CO2e. Aes, 8 facilities, 15.45M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent north-carolina-electric-membership · 2023 #1092 · 96K MT

CO2E-THIN · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS · TREND-CUT · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-THIN 96K MT
  • MID-PACK #1092/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH United Ethanol · Other
  • FAC-PAIR 2 facilities
  • SPAN-HOME 1 state
  • SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS Power Plants
  • TREND-CUT −53% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: United Ethanol · Other (±84 MT)

Instrument codes from this parent’s EPA GHGRP rollup: CO₂e band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend, and book completeness. Not an EPA grade or compliance rating.

2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book

This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 96K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
99.9%
96K MT
CH₄
0%
47 MT
N₂O
0.1%
61 MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around North Carolina Electric Membership

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MIngomar Packing · Other · ne…97KNorth Carolina Electr… · Pow…96KUnited Ethanol · Other · near96KNorthern Utah Environ… · Was…96KTop Gun Investment CO… · Met…96KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around North Carolina Electric Membership · May 2026

Largest facilities by reported emissions

North Carolina Electric Membership - top facilities (MT CO₂e)

NCEMC Anson Plant53KNCEMC Hamlet Plant44K

North Carolina Electric Membership's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Emissions decline across reporting years

North Carolina Electric Membership - declining annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
96K MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0M0.1M0.2M0.3M0.4M 2011201320152017201920212023 0.1M

North Carolina Electric Membership annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

North Carolina Electric Membership reported 96K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 204K MT in 2011 - a decline of 52.6% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Facilities (2)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
NCEMC Anson Plant
Power Plants
LILESVILLE, NC
53K
NCEMC Hamlet Plant
Power Plants
HAMLET, NC
44K

Nationwide parents with similar GHGRP profiles

Three EPA GHGRP-derived peer sets for North Carolina Electric Membership. The CO₂e neighbourhood chart above shows poles; these links are navigable comparison paths beyond Power Plants browse pages.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using North Carolina Electric Membership's emissions profile

  • North Carolina Electric Membership runs mid-intensity per facility (48K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Power Plants sector on the Power Plants industry page.
  • It ranks #1092 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Power Plants emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.