EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Waste

Norton Environmental - lower-footprint GHGRP parent

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), a smaller reporting parent: 46K MT CO₂e from 2 sites in 1 state (2023).

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
46K
Reporting facilities
2
States covered
1
Overall rank
#1602
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

46K MT CO₂e · 2023

According to the EPA GHGRP, Norton Environmental reported 46K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 2 facilities in 1 state (ranks #1,602 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions decreased 35% over the tracked period.

  • Overall rank #1602 of 2,289
  • #370 in Waste
  • -34.7% since 2011

Norton Environmental vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

46,342 1602nd of 2289 higher than 687 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Norton Environmental spreads its footprint vs Waste peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Waste companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 0.7M MT).

Median split: 5 facilities, 0.7M MT CO₂e among Waste peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 050100150200250 0M5M10M15M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Waste
Median split: 5 facilities, 0.7M MT CO₂e among Waste peers.

You are here: Norton Environmental.

Waste peer footprint table: Norton Environmental, 2 facilities, 0.05M MT CO2e. Waste Management, 225 facilities, 11.65M MT CO2e. Republic Services, 177 facilities, 10.72M MT CO2e. Covanta Holding, 22 facilities, 4.2M MT CO2e. Waste Connections US, 40 facilities, 3.63M MT CO2e. Gfl Environmental Holdings (us), 30 facilities, 2.45M MT CO2e. Wheelabrator Technologies Holdings, 12 facilities, 2.22M MT CO2e. Rumpke Consolidated Cos, 9 facilities, 1.69M MT CO2e. County of Orange California, 5 facilities, 1.13M MT CO2e. County of Lycoming Pennsylvania, 1 facilities, 0.9M MT CO2e. County of Pinellas Florida, 2 facilities, 0.77M MT CO2e. Apex Environmental, 1 facilities, 0.7M MT CO2e. County of Brevard Florida, 1 facilities, 0.67M MT CO2e. City of El Paso Texas, 2 facilities, 0.54M MT CO2e. Waste Connections, 8 facilities, 0.51M MT CO2e. City of Baton Rouge Louisiana, 2 facilities, 0.51M MT CO2e. Solid Waste Authority of Palm Beach County Florida, 3 facilities, 0.5M MT CO2e. City of Dallas Texas, 1 facilities, 0.48M MT CO2e. Casella Waste Systems, 9 facilities, 0.46M MT CO2e. County of Polk Florida, 1 facilities, 0.43M MT CO2e. US Government, 9 facilities, 0.42M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent norton-environmental · 2023 #1602 · 46K MT

CO2E-THIN · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-WASTE · TREND-CUT · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-THIN 46K MT
  • MID-PACK #1602/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH Richmond Sanitary Dis… · Waste
  • FAC-PAIR 2 facilities
  • SPAN-HOME 1 state
  • SECTOR-WASTE Waste
  • TREND-CUT −35% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: Richmond Sanitary District · Waste (±1 MT)

Lower-footprint parent stamps from this GHGRP rollup, comparative context only, not a compliance rating.

2023 methane-weighted parent mix

Methane leads the non-CO₂ share for Norton Environmental: CH₄ is 100% of 46K MT CO₂e in 2023 (N₂O 0%). Non-CO₂ gases total 100%. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
-
n/r
CH₄
100%
46K MT
N₂O
-
n/r

CO₂e neighbourhood around Norton Environmental

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MLimetree Bay Terminals · Pet…47KNorton Environmental · Waste…46KRichmond Sanitary Dis… · Was…46KCity of Lee's Summit… · Wast…46KPark-Ohio Holdings · Other ·…46KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Norton Environmental · May 2026

Reporting sites by CO₂e

Norton Environmental - site CO₂e (MT)

Mt. Eaton Landfill28KRoyalton Road Sanitary Landf…19K

Norton Environmental's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Emissions decline across reporting years

Norton Environmental - declining annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
46K MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0.04M0.06M0.08M0.1M0.12M0.14M 2011201320152017201920212023 0.05M

Norton Environmental annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Norton Environmental reported 46K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 71K MT in 2011 - a decline of 34.7% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Facilities (2)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
Mt. Eaton Landfill
Waste
Navarre, OH
28K
Royalton Road Sanitary Landfill
Waste
Broadview Heights, OH
19K

Nationwide peers for a lower-footprint parent

Comparison paths for a smaller GHGRP parent: nearest CO₂e totals, similar facility counts, and intensity neighbors beyond Waste browse pages.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Norton Environmental's emissions profile

  • Norton Environmental runs low-intensity per facility (23K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Waste sector on the Waste industry page.
  • It ranks #1602 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Waste emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.