EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Power Plants
Osaka Gas Energy America - top-third GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 4 facilities across 4 states (2.7M MT CO₂e in 2023).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 2.7M
- Reporting facilities
- 4
- States covered
- 4
- Overall rank
- #174
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, Osaka Gas Energy America reported 2.7M MT CO₂e in 2023 across 4 facilities in 4 states (ranks among the top 10% of U.S. corporate GHG emitters (#174 of 2,289)) Emissions increased 124% over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #174 of 2,289
- #100 in Power Plants
- +124.4% since 2011
Osaka Gas Energy America vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
2,711,383 174th of 2289 higher than 2,115 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Osaka Gas Energy America spreads its footprint vs Power Plants peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Power Plants companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (19 facilities, 26.77M MT).
You are here: Osaka Gas Energy America.
Power Plants peer footprint table: Osaka Gas Energy America, 4 facilities, 2.71M MT CO2e. Vistra, 40 facilities, 86.32M MT CO2e. The Southern, 26 facilities, 78.01M MT CO2e. Duke Energy, 39 facilities, 65.01M MT CO2e. CPN Management, 43 facilities, 47.58M MT CO2e. Nextera Energy, 19 facilities, 45.57M MT CO2e. American Electric Power CO, 22 facilities, 44.72M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 27 facilities, 39.8M MT CO2e. US Government, 21 facilities, 38.21M MT CO2e. Entergy, 23 facilities, 33.86M MT CO2e. Xcel Energy, 28 facilities, 29.03M MT CO2e. PPL, 6 facilities, 26.77M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 22 facilities, 25.19M MT CO2e. DTE Energy, 12 facilities, 22.31M MT CO2e. NRG Energy, 14 facilities, 22.1M MT CO2e. Ameren, 11 facilities, 19.88M MT CO2e. Evergy, 12 facilities, 19.87M MT CO2e. Lightstone Generation, 4 facilities, 19.14M MT CO2e. Talen Energy, 11 facilities, 17.72M MT CO2e. Associated Electric Cooperative, 7 facilities, 15.57M MT CO2e. Aes, 8 facilities, 15.45M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent osaka-gas-energy-america · 2023 #174 · 2.7M MT
CO2E-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-MULTI · SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MID 2.7M MT
- TOP-DECILE #174/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH National Grid USA · Power Plants
- FAC-PAIR 4 facilities
- SPAN-MULTI 4 states
- SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS Power Plants
- TREND-SURGE +124% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: National Grid USA · Power Plants (±18K MT)
Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.
2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book
This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 2.7M MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 99.9%
- 2.7M MT
- CH₄
- 0.1%
- 1K MT
- N₂O
- 0.1%
- 2K MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Osaka Gas Energy America
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest sites in a top-third parent book
Osaka Gas Energy America - top sites (MT CO₂e)
Osaka Gas Energy America's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Emissions growth across reporting years
Osaka Gas Energy America - rising annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 2.7M MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Osaka Gas Energy America annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
Osaka Gas Energy America reported 2.7M MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 1.2M MT in 2011 - a rise of 124.4% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Multi-site facilities (4)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| St Charles Energy Center Power Plants Waldorf, MD | Waldorf, MD | 1.6M |
| Michigan Power Limited Partnership Power Plants LUDINGTON, MI | LUDINGTON, MI | 535K |
| Marianas Energy Company Power Plants Piti, GU | Piti, GU | 407K |
| Saranac Power Partners, LP Power Plants PLATTSBURGH, NY | PLATTSBURGH, NY | 164K |
Where Osaka Gas Energy America's reported CO₂e sits by state
59.2% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Maryland (1 site) ; next is Michigan at 19.7% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.
Osaka Gas Energy America reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state
Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent
Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (2.7M MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (2.7M MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (4 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (678K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Osaka Gas Energy America's emissions profile
- Osaka Gas Energy America runs high-intensity per facility (678K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Power Plants sector on the Power Plants industry page.
- It ranks #174 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Power Plants emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.