EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Power Plants

Otter Tail - top-third GHGRP parent

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 2 facilities across 2 states (316K MT CO₂e in 2023).

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
316K
Reporting facilities
2
States covered
2
Overall rank
#593
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

316K MT CO₂e · 2023

According to the EPA GHGRP, Otter Tail reported 316K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 2 facilities in 2 states (ranks #593 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions increased 1537% over the tracked period.

  • Overall rank #593 of 2,289
  • #263 in Power Plants
  • +1537.2% since 2011

Otter Tail vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

316,143 593rd of 2289 higher than 1,696 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Otter Tail spreads its footprint vs Power Plants peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Power Plants companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (19 facilities, 26.77M MT).

Median split: 19 facilities, 26.77M MT CO₂e among Power Plants peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 01020304050 0M20M40M60M80M100M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Power Plants
Median split: 19 facilities, 26.77M MT CO₂e among Power Plants peers.

You are here: Otter Tail.

Power Plants peer footprint table: Otter Tail, 2 facilities, 0.32M MT CO2e. Vistra, 40 facilities, 86.32M MT CO2e. The Southern, 26 facilities, 78.01M MT CO2e. Duke Energy, 39 facilities, 65.01M MT CO2e. CPN Management, 43 facilities, 47.58M MT CO2e. Nextera Energy, 19 facilities, 45.57M MT CO2e. American Electric Power CO, 22 facilities, 44.72M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 27 facilities, 39.8M MT CO2e. US Government, 21 facilities, 38.21M MT CO2e. Entergy, 23 facilities, 33.86M MT CO2e. Xcel Energy, 28 facilities, 29.03M MT CO2e. PPL, 6 facilities, 26.77M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 22 facilities, 25.19M MT CO2e. DTE Energy, 12 facilities, 22.31M MT CO2e. NRG Energy, 14 facilities, 22.1M MT CO2e. Ameren, 11 facilities, 19.88M MT CO2e. Evergy, 12 facilities, 19.87M MT CO2e. Lightstone Generation, 4 facilities, 19.14M MT CO2e. Talen Energy, 11 facilities, 17.72M MT CO2e. Associated Electric Cooperative, 7 facilities, 15.57M MT CO2e. Aes, 8 facilities, 15.45M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent otter-tail · 2023 #593 · 316K MT

CO2E-MODEST · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-PAIR · SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-MODEST 316K MT
  • MID-PACK #593/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH Hood Cos · Pulp and Paper
  • FAC-PAIR 2 facilities
  • SPAN-PAIR 2 states
  • SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS Power Plants
  • TREND-SURGE +1537% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: Hood Cos · Pulp and Paper (±180 MT)

Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.

2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book

This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 316K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
99.9%
316K MT
CH₄
0%
146 MT
N₂O
0.1%
174 MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Otter Tail

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MOtter Tail · Power Plants · …316KHood Cos · Pulp and Pa… · ne…316KIndeck Energy Services · Pow…316KInternational Grand I… · Pul…316KSeminole County Board… · Was…315KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Otter Tail · May 2026

Largest sites in a top-third parent book

Otter Tail - top sites (MT CO₂e)

Astoria Station228KSolway Plant88K

Otter Tail's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Emissions growth across reporting years

Otter Tail - rising annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
316K MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0M0.1M0.2M0.3M0.4M 2011201320152017201920212023 0.32M

Otter Tail annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Otter Tail reported 316K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 19K MT in 2011 - a rise of 1537.2% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Facilities (2)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
Astoria Station
Power Plants
Astoria, SD
228K
Solway Plant
Power Plants
SOLWAY, MN
88K

Where Otter Tail's reported CO₂e sits by state

72.1% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in South Dakota (1 site) ; next is Minnesota at 27.9% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.

SD228KMN88K
EPA GHGRP · Otter Tail facility CO₂e by state · May 2026

Otter Tail reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent

Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (316K MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Otter Tail's emissions profile

  • Otter Tail runs high-intensity per facility (158K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Power Plants sector on the Power Plants industry page.
  • It ranks #593 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Power Plants emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.