EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Oxbow Carbon & Minerals Holdings - top-third GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 3 facilities across 3 states (913K MT CO₂e in 2023).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 913K
- Reporting facilities
- 3
- States covered
- 3
- Overall rank
- #355
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, Oxbow Carbon & Minerals Holdings reported 913K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 3 facilities in 3 states (ranks #355 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions increased 6% over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #355 of 2,289
- #25 in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
- +5.7% since 2011
Oxbow Carbon & Minerals Holdings vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
913,486 355th of 2289 higher than 1,934 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Oxbow Carbon & Minerals Holdings spreads its footprint vs Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (21 facilities, 2.77M MT).
You are here: Oxbow Carbon & Minerals Holdings.
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peer footprint table: Oxbow Carbon & Minerals Holdings, 3 facilities, 0.91M MT CO2e. Cheniere Energy, 5 facilities, 9.73M MT CO2e. Energy Transfer, 129 facilities, 8.89M MT CO2e. Hilcorp Energy, 18 facilities, 8.26M MT CO2e. Kinder Morgan, 169 facilities, 8.24M MT CO2e. Enterprise Products Partners, 43 facilities, 7.79M MT CO2e. Enbridge (us), 80 facilities, 5.72M MT CO2e. The Williams Cos, 59 facilities, 5.48M MT CO2e. Transcanada Pipeline USA, 76 facilities, 4.45M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 5 facilities, 3.26M MT CO2e. Venture Global LNG, 1 facilities, 2.84M MT CO2e. Sempra Energy, 5 facilities, 2.77M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 56 facilities, 2.3M MT CO2e. Targa Resources, 21 facilities, 2.22M MT CO2e. GIP Pilot Acquisition Partners, 26 facilities, 2.08M MT CO2e. Loews, 41 facilities, 1.94M MT CO2e. Occidental Petroleum, 19 facilities, 1.55M MT CO2e. Enlink Midstream, 11 facilities, 1.5M MT CO2e. Oneok, 23 facilities, 1.44M MT CO2e. Ecoelectrica, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. IKAV Impact USA, 4 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent oxbow-carbon-minerals-holdings · 2023 #355 · 913K MT
CO2E-MODEST · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-PAIR · SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN · TREND-UP · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MODEST 913K MT
- UPPER-Q #355/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH O-I Glass · Minerals
- FAC-PAIR 3 facilities
- SPAN-PAIR 3 states
- SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN Petroleum and Nat…
- TREND-UP +6% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: O-I Glass · Minerals (±3K MT)
Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.
2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book
This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.7% of 913K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.3%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 99.7%
- 911K MT
- CH₄
- 0.1%
- 827 MT
- N₂O
- 0.2%
- 2K MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Oxbow Carbon & Minerals Holdings
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest sites in a top-third parent book
Oxbow Carbon & Minerals Holdings - top sites (MT CO₂e)
Oxbow Carbon & Minerals Holdings's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
High-emitter reporting timeline
Oxbow Carbon & Minerals Holdings - high-emitter annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 913K MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Oxbow Carbon & Minerals Holdings annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
Oxbow Carbon & Minerals Holdings reported 913K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 864K MT in 2011 - a rise of 5.7% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Multi-site facilities (3)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| OXBOW CALCINING LLC Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems KREMLIN, OK | KREMLIN, OK | 353K |
| OXBOW CALCINING Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems PORT ARTHUR, TX | PORT ARTHUR, TX | 282K |
| Oxbow Calcining LLC Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Baton Rouge, LA | Baton Rouge, LA | 279K |
Where Oxbow Carbon & Minerals Holdings's reported CO₂e sits by state
38.6% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Oklahoma (1 site) ; next is Texas at 30.9% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.
Oxbow Carbon & Minerals Holdings reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state
Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent
Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (913K MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (913K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (3 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (304K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Oxbow Carbon & Minerals Holdings's emissions profile
- Oxbow Carbon & Minerals Holdings runs high-intensity per facility (304K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems sector on the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems industry page.
- It ranks #355 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.