EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Other

Pennsylania Grain Processing - per-facility CO₂e intensity

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), high per-facility intensity (165K MT/site) across 1 reporting facility in 1 state.

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
165K
Reporting facilities
1
States covered
1
Overall rank
#813
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

165K MT CO₂e · 2023

Pennsylania Grain Processing averages 165K MT CO₂e per reporting facility (high-intensity NTILE) on 165K MT total in 2023.

  • Overall rank #813 of 2,289
  • #128 in Other
  • +222.1% since 2012

Pennsylania Grain Processing vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

164,959 813th of 2289 higher than 1,476 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Pennsylania Grain Processing spreads its footprint vs Other peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Other companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 2.28M MT).

Median split: 5 facilities, 2.28M MT CO₂e among Other peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 0204060 0M5M10M15M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Other
Median split: 5 facilities, 2.28M MT CO₂e among Other peers.

You are here: Pennsylania Grain Processing.

Other peer footprint table: Pennsylania Grain Processing, 1 facilities, 0.16M MT CO2e. Prairie State Energy Campus Management, 1 facilities, 11.46M MT CO2e. Marathon Petroleum, 4 facilities, 7.11M MT CO2e. Archer Daniels Midland, 15 facilities, 6.67M MT CO2e. Consol Energy, 4 facilities, 6.53M MT CO2e. American Consolidated Natural Resources, 6 facilities, 6.29M MT CO2e. Hummel Station, 1 facilities, 2.91M MT CO2e. Arch Resources, 5 facilities, 2.83M MT CO2e. US Government, 51 facilities, 2.78M MT CO2e. Poet, 28 facilities, 2.66M MT CO2e. Cargill, 27 facilities, 2.51M MT CO2e. Alliance Holdings Gp, 5 facilities, 2.28M MT CO2e. Valero Energy, 12 facilities, 2.24M MT CO2e. Tyson Foods, 31 facilities, 1.72M MT CO2e. Iron Senergy Holding, 1 facilities, 1.64M MT CO2e. Karnavati Holdings, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. Hatfield Metallurgical Intermediate Holdings, 1 facilities, 1.38M MT CO2e. Alpha Metallurgical Resources, 9 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e. Hallador Energy, 2 facilities, 1.32M MT CO2e. Green Plains, 11 facilities, 1.3M MT CO2e. Coronado Group, 3 facilities, 1.28M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent pennsylania-grain-processing · 2023 #813 · 165K MT

CO2E-MODEST · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-SINGLE · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-OTHER · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-MODEST 165K MT
  • MID-PACK #813/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH Futurefuel · Chemicals
  • FAC-SINGLE 1 facility
  • SPAN-HOME 1 state
  • SECTOR-OTHER Other
  • TREND-SURGE +222% since 2012
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: Futurefuel · Chemicals (±50 MT)

Instrument codes from this parent’s EPA GHGRP rollup: CO₂e band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend, and book completeness. Not an EPA grade or compliance rating.

2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book

This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 165K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
99.9%
165K MT
CH₄
0%
78 MT
N₂O
0.1%
93 MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Pennsylania Grain Processing

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MMontgomery County Gov… · Was…165KOrange County Utiliti… · Was…165KCoffee County Commiss… · Was…165KPennsylania Grain Pro… · Oth…165KFuturefuel · Chemicals · near165KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Pennsylania Grain Processing · May 2026

Emissions growth across reporting years

Pennsylania Grain Processing - rising annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2012–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
165K MT
12 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0M0.05M0.1M0.15M0.2M 201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023 0.16M

Pennsylania Grain Processing annual reported GHG emissions, 2012–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Pennsylania Grain Processing reported 165K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 51K MT in 2012 - a rise of 222.1% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Facilities (1)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
Pennsylvania Grain Processing, LLC
Other
Clearfield, PA
165K

Nationwide parents with similar intensity profiles

Intensity-led peer sets around 165K MT per facility, plus nearest totals and facility-book matches.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Pennsylania Grain Processing's emissions profile

  • Pennsylania Grain Processing runs high-intensity per facility (165K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Other sector on the Other industry page.
  • It ranks #813 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Other emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.