EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Injection of CO2
Pinon Midstream - GHG emissions profile
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), Scope 1 emissions reported across 1 reporting facility in 1 state.
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 69K
- Reporting facilities
- 1
- States covered
- 1
- Overall rank
- #1304
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, Pinon Midstream reported 69K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 1 facility in 1 state (ranks #1,304 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions increased 10% over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #1304 of 2,289
- #6 in Injection of CO2
- +9.6% since 2022
Pinon Midstream vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
69,069 1304th of 2289 higher than 985 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Pinon Midstream spreads its footprint vs Injection of CO2 peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 16 Injection of CO2 companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (1 facilities, 0.15M MT).
You are here: Pinon Midstream.
Injection of CO2 peer footprint table: Pinon Midstream, 1 facilities, 0.07M MT CO2e. Archer Daniels Midland, 1 facilities, 3.82M MT CO2e. Exxon Mobil, 1 facilities, 3.16M MT CO2e. Enbridge (us), 4 facilities, 0.73M MT CO2e. Lucid Energy Group II, 1 facilities, 0.57M MT CO2e. Targa Resources, 6 facilities, 0.41M MT CO2e. Stakeholder Gas Services, 2 facilities, 0.3M MT CO2e. Energy Transfer, 3 facilities, 0.21M MT CO2e. Durango Midstream, 2 facilities, 0.15M MT CO2e. Red Trail Energy, 1 facilities, 0.09M MT CO2e. Contango Resources, 1 facilities, 0.07M MT CO2e. Oneok, 1 facilities, 0.06M MT CO2e. The Williams Cos, 1 facilities, 0.04M MT CO2e. Occidental Petroleum, 1 facilities, 0.04M MT CO2e. Core Energy, 1 facilities, 0.03M MT CO2e. Riverside Energy, 1 facilities, 0M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent pinon-midstream · 2023 #1304 · 69K MT
CO2E-THIN · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-SINGLE · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-INJECTION-OF · TREND-UP · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-THIN 69K MT
- MID-PACK #1304/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH City of Mt Pleasant · Waste
- FAC-SINGLE 1 facility
- SPAN-HOME 1 state
- SECTOR-INJECTION-OF Injection of CO2
- TREND-UP +10% since 2022
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: City of Mt Pleasant · Waste (±13 MT)
Instrument codes from this parent’s EPA GHGRP rollup: CO₂e band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend, and book completeness. Not an EPA grade or compliance rating.
2023 mixed non-CO₂ parent desk
Non-CO₂ gases are 1.5% of 69K MT CO₂e in 2023, with CH₄ at 1.4% and N₂O at 0.1%, and neither gas dominates alone. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 98.5%
- 68K MT
- CH₄
- 1.4%
- 977 MT
- N₂O
- 0.1%
- 38 MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Pinon Midstream
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Reported emissions over time
Pinon Midstream - annual reported GHG emissions
EPA GHGRP 2022–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 69K MT
- 2 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Pinon Midstream annual reported GHG emissions, 2022–2023
Pinon Midstream reported 69K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 63K MT in 2022 - a rise of 9.6% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Facilities (1)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| Dark Horse Treating Plant Injection of CO2 Jal, NM | Jal, NM | 69K |
Nationwide parents with similar GHGRP profiles
Three EPA GHGRP-derived peer sets for Pinon Midstream. The CO₂e neighbourhood chart above shows poles; these links are navigable comparison paths beyond Injection of CO2 browse pages.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (69K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (1 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (69K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Pinon Midstream's emissions profile
- Pinon Midstream runs mid-intensity per facility (69K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Injection of CO2 sector on the Injection of CO2 industry page.
- It ranks #1304 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Injection of CO2 emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.