EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2011 · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Pruet Production - lower-footprint GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), a smaller reporting parent: 17K MT CO₂e from 1 site in 1 state (2011).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 17K
- Reporting facilities
- 1
- States covered
- 1
- Overall rank
- #2136
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, Pruet Production reported 17K MT CO₂e in 2011 across 1 facility in 1 state (ranks #2,136 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e)
- Overall rank #2136 of 2,289
- #143 in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
- Reporting years 2011–2011
Pruet Production vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
17,304 2136th of 2289 higher than 153 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2011
How Pruet Production spreads its footprint vs Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (21 facilities, 2.77M MT).
You are here: Pruet Production.
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peer footprint table: Pruet Production, 1 facilities, 0.02M MT CO2e. Cheniere Energy, 5 facilities, 9.73M MT CO2e. Energy Transfer, 129 facilities, 8.89M MT CO2e. Hilcorp Energy, 18 facilities, 8.26M MT CO2e. Kinder Morgan, 169 facilities, 8.24M MT CO2e. Enterprise Products Partners, 43 facilities, 7.79M MT CO2e. Enbridge (us), 80 facilities, 5.72M MT CO2e. The Williams Cos, 59 facilities, 5.48M MT CO2e. Transcanada Pipeline USA, 76 facilities, 4.45M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 5 facilities, 3.26M MT CO2e. Venture Global LNG, 1 facilities, 2.84M MT CO2e. Sempra Energy, 5 facilities, 2.77M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 56 facilities, 2.3M MT CO2e. Targa Resources, 21 facilities, 2.22M MT CO2e. GIP Pilot Acquisition Partners, 26 facilities, 2.08M MT CO2e. Loews, 41 facilities, 1.94M MT CO2e. Occidental Petroleum, 19 facilities, 1.55M MT CO2e. Enlink Midstream, 11 facilities, 1.5M MT CO2e. Oneok, 23 facilities, 1.44M MT CO2e. Ecoelectrica, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. IKAV Impact USA, 4 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent pruet-production · 2011 #2136 · 17K MT
CO2E-THIN · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-SINGLE · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN · TREND-UNK · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-THIN 17K MT
- BOTTOM-DECILE #2136/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Terrebonne Parish Con… · Power Plants
- FAC-SINGLE 1 facility
- SPAN-HOME 1 state
- SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN Petroleum and Nat…
- TREND-UNK Trend thin
- BOOK-RICH 6/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Terrebonne Parish Consolidated Government · Power Plants (±85 MT)
Lower-footprint parent stamps from this GHGRP rollup, comparative context only, not a compliance rating.
CO₂e neighbourhood around Pruet Production
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Facilities (1)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| Mid-Gulf Coast Basin Code 210 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Jackson, MS | Jackson, MS | 17K |
Nationwide peers for a lower-footprint parent
Comparison paths for a smaller GHGRP parent: nearest CO₂e totals, similar facility counts, and intensity neighbors beyond Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems browse pages.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (17K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (1 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (17K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Pruet Production's emissions profile
- Pruet Production runs low-intensity per facility (17K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems sector on the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems industry page.
- It ranks #2136 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.