EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems

Salt Creek Midstream - top-third GHGRP parent

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 1 facility across 1 state (239K MT CO₂e in 2023).

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
239K
Reporting facilities
1
States covered
1
Overall rank
#682
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

239K MT CO₂e · 2023

According to the EPA GHGRP, Salt Creek Midstream reported 239K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 1 facility in 1 state (ranks #682 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions increased 8% over the tracked period.

  • Overall rank #682 of 2,289
  • #55 in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
  • +8.0% since 2019

Salt Creek Midstream vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

238,618 682nd of 2289 higher than 1,607 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Salt Creek Midstream spreads its footprint vs Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (21 facilities, 2.77M MT).

Median split: 21 facilities, 2.77M MT CO₂e among Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 050100150200 0M5M10M15M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Median split: 21 facilities, 2.77M MT CO₂e among Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers.

You are here: Salt Creek Midstream.

Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peer footprint table: Salt Creek Midstream, 1 facilities, 0.24M MT CO2e. Cheniere Energy, 5 facilities, 9.73M MT CO2e. Energy Transfer, 129 facilities, 8.89M MT CO2e. Hilcorp Energy, 18 facilities, 8.26M MT CO2e. Kinder Morgan, 169 facilities, 8.24M MT CO2e. Enterprise Products Partners, 43 facilities, 7.79M MT CO2e. Enbridge (us), 80 facilities, 5.72M MT CO2e. The Williams Cos, 59 facilities, 5.48M MT CO2e. Transcanada Pipeline USA, 76 facilities, 4.45M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 5 facilities, 3.26M MT CO2e. Venture Global LNG, 1 facilities, 2.84M MT CO2e. Sempra Energy, 5 facilities, 2.77M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 56 facilities, 2.3M MT CO2e. Targa Resources, 21 facilities, 2.22M MT CO2e. GIP Pilot Acquisition Partners, 26 facilities, 2.08M MT CO2e. Loews, 41 facilities, 1.94M MT CO2e. Occidental Petroleum, 19 facilities, 1.55M MT CO2e. Enlink Midstream, 11 facilities, 1.5M MT CO2e. Oneok, 23 facilities, 1.44M MT CO2e. Ecoelectrica, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. IKAV Impact USA, 4 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent salt-creek-midstream · 2023 #682 · 239K MT

CO2E-MODEST · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-SINGLE · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN · TREND-UP · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-MODEST 239K MT
  • MID-PACK #682/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH City of Ames Iowa · Power Plants
  • FAC-SINGLE 1 facility
  • SPAN-HOME 1 state
  • SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN Petroleum and Nat…
  • TREND-UP +8% since 2019
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: City of Ames Iowa · Power Plants (±163 MT)

Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.

2023 methane-weighted parent mix

Methane leads the non-CO₂ share for Salt Creek Midstream: CH₄ is 4.4% of 239K MT CO₂e in 2023 (N₂O 0%). Non-CO₂ gases total 4.4%. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
95.6%
228K MT
CH₄
4.4%
10K MT
N₂O
0%
95 MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Salt Creek Midstream

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MState of Florida · Waste · n…242KSolid Waste Disposal… · Wast…241KCity of Ames Iowa · Power Pl…239KSalt Creek Midstream · Petro…239KCity & County of Hono… · Was…235KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Salt Creek Midstream · May 2026

High-emitter reporting timeline

Salt Creek Midstream - high-emitter annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2019–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
239K MT
5 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0.2M0.22M0.24M0.26M0.28M0.3M 20192020202120222023 0.24M

Salt Creek Midstream annual reported GHG emissions, 2019–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Salt Creek Midstream reported 239K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 221K MT in 2019 - a rise of 8.0% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Facilities (1)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
SCM Pecos Gas Processing Plant
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Pecos, TX
239K

Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent

Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (239K MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Salt Creek Midstream's emissions profile

  • Salt Creek Midstream runs high-intensity per facility (239K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems sector on the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems industry page.
  • It ranks #682 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.