EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
San Mateo Midstream - per-facility CO₂e intensity
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), high per-facility intensity (117K MT/site) across 1 reporting facility in 1 state.
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 117K
- Reporting facilities
- 1
- States covered
- 1
- Overall rank
- #982
Data updated May 2026
San Mateo Midstream averages 117K MT CO₂e per reporting facility (high-intensity NTILE) on 117K MT total in 2023.
- Overall rank #982 of 2,289
- #72 in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
- +57.7% since 2019
San Mateo Midstream vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
117,141 982nd of 2289 higher than 1,307 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How San Mateo Midstream spreads its footprint vs Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (21 facilities, 2.77M MT).
You are here: San Mateo Midstream.
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peer footprint table: San Mateo Midstream, 1 facilities, 0.12M MT CO2e. Cheniere Energy, 5 facilities, 9.73M MT CO2e. Energy Transfer, 129 facilities, 8.89M MT CO2e. Hilcorp Energy, 18 facilities, 8.26M MT CO2e. Kinder Morgan, 169 facilities, 8.24M MT CO2e. Enterprise Products Partners, 43 facilities, 7.79M MT CO2e. Enbridge (us), 80 facilities, 5.72M MT CO2e. The Williams Cos, 59 facilities, 5.48M MT CO2e. Transcanada Pipeline USA, 76 facilities, 4.45M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 5 facilities, 3.26M MT CO2e. Venture Global LNG, 1 facilities, 2.84M MT CO2e. Sempra Energy, 5 facilities, 2.77M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 56 facilities, 2.3M MT CO2e. Targa Resources, 21 facilities, 2.22M MT CO2e. GIP Pilot Acquisition Partners, 26 facilities, 2.08M MT CO2e. Loews, 41 facilities, 1.94M MT CO2e. Occidental Petroleum, 19 facilities, 1.55M MT CO2e. Enlink Midstream, 11 facilities, 1.5M MT CO2e. Oneok, 23 facilities, 1.44M MT CO2e. Ecoelectrica, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. IKAV Impact USA, 4 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent san-mateo-midstream · 2023 #982 · 117K MT
CO2E-MODEST · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-SINGLE · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MODEST 117K MT
- MID-PACK #982/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH County of Angelina Te… · Waste
- FAC-SINGLE 1 facility
- SPAN-HOME 1 state
- SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN Petroleum and Nat…
- TREND-SURGE +58% since 2019
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: County of Angelina Texas · Waste (±79 MT)
Instrument codes from this parent’s EPA GHGRP rollup: CO₂e band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend, and book completeness. Not an EPA grade or compliance rating.
2023 methane-weighted parent mix
Methane leads the non-CO₂ share for San Mateo Midstream: CH₄ is 5.4% of 117K MT CO₂e in 2023 (N₂O 0%). Non-CO₂ gases total 5.4%. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 94.6%
- 111K MT
- CH₄
- 5.4%
- 6K MT
- N₂O
- 0%
- 37 MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around San Mateo Midstream
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Emissions growth across reporting years
San Mateo Midstream - rising annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2019–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 117K MT
- 5 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
San Mateo Midstream annual reported GHG emissions, 2019–2023
San Mateo Midstream reported 117K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 74K MT in 2019 - a rise of 57.7% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Facilities (1)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| Black River Gas Processing Plant Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Loving, NM | Loving, NM | 117K |
Nationwide parents with similar intensity profiles
Intensity-led peer sets around 117K MT per facility, plus nearest totals and facility-book matches.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (117K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (1 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (117K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using San Mateo Midstream's emissions profile
- San Mateo Midstream runs high-intensity per facility (117K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems sector on the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems industry page.
- It ranks #982 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.