EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Other
Si Group USA Holdings (usha) - rising reported GHG
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), Scope 1 emissions reported across 2 reporting facilities in 2 states.
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 100K
- Reporting facilities
- 2
- States covered
- 2
- Overall rank
- #1070
Data updated May 2026
Si Group USA Holdings (usha) reported emissions rose 222.7% since 2011 to 100K MT CO₂e in 2023.
- Overall rank #1070 of 2,289
- #209 in Other
- +222.7% since 2011
Si Group USA Holdings (usha) vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
99,703 1070th of 2289 higher than 1,219 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Si Group USA Holdings (usha) spreads its footprint vs Other peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Other companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 2.28M MT).
You are here: Si Group USA Holdings (usha).
Other peer footprint table: Si Group USA Holdings (usha), 2 facilities, 0.1M MT CO2e. Prairie State Energy Campus Management, 1 facilities, 11.46M MT CO2e. Marathon Petroleum, 4 facilities, 7.11M MT CO2e. Archer Daniels Midland, 15 facilities, 6.67M MT CO2e. Consol Energy, 4 facilities, 6.53M MT CO2e. American Consolidated Natural Resources, 6 facilities, 6.29M MT CO2e. Hummel Station, 1 facilities, 2.91M MT CO2e. Arch Resources, 5 facilities, 2.83M MT CO2e. US Government, 51 facilities, 2.78M MT CO2e. Poet, 28 facilities, 2.66M MT CO2e. Cargill, 27 facilities, 2.51M MT CO2e. Alliance Holdings Gp, 5 facilities, 2.28M MT CO2e. Valero Energy, 12 facilities, 2.24M MT CO2e. Tyson Foods, 31 facilities, 1.72M MT CO2e. Iron Senergy Holding, 1 facilities, 1.64M MT CO2e. Karnavati Holdings, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. Hatfield Metallurgical Intermediate Holdings, 1 facilities, 1.38M MT CO2e. Alpha Metallurgical Resources, 9 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e. Hallador Energy, 2 facilities, 1.32M MT CO2e. Green Plains, 11 facilities, 1.3M MT CO2e. Coronado Group, 3 facilities, 1.28M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent si-group-usa-holdings-usha · 2023 #1070 · 100K MT
CO2E-THIN · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-PAIR · SECTOR-OTHER · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-THIN 100K MT
- MID-PACK #1070/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Abbvie · Chemicals
- FAC-PAIR 2 facilities
- SPAN-PAIR 2 states
- SECTOR-OTHER Other
- TREND-SURGE +223% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Abbvie · Chemicals (±75 MT)
Instrument codes from this parent’s EPA GHGRP rollup: CO₂e band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend, and book completeness. Not an EPA grade or compliance rating.
2023 methane-weighted parent mix
Methane leads the non-CO₂ share for Si Group USA Holdings: CH₄ is 16% of 100K MT CO₂e in 2023 (N₂O 0%). Non-CO₂ gases total 16%. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 84%
- 84K MT
- CH₄
- 16%
- 16K MT
- N₂O
- 0%
- 48 MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Si Group USA Holdings
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest facilities by reported emissions
Si Group USA Holdings (usha) - top facilities (MT CO₂e)
Si Group USA Holdings (usha)'s largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Emissions growth across reporting years
Si Group USA Holdings (usha) - rising annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 100K MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Si Group USA Holdings (usha) annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
Si Group USA Holdings (usha) reported 100K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 31K MT in 2011 - a rise of 222.7% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Facilities (2)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| SI Group, Inc. Chemicals Orangeburg, SC | Orangeburg, SC | 72K |
| SI GROUP INC /ROTT JCT FAC Other ROTTERDAM JUNCTION, NY | ROTTERDAM JUNCTION, NY | 28K |
Where Si Group USA Holdings's reported CO₂e sits by state
72.3% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in South Carolina (1 site) ; next is New York at 27.7% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.
Si Group USA Holdings (usha) reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state
Si Group USA Holdings's reported CO₂e by EPA sector
Top sector Chemicals is 72.3% of this parent's facility CO₂e (1 site) ; Other follows at 27.7% . Sector labels are EPA GHGRP facility industry_sector values.
Si Group USA Holdings (usha) reported facility CO₂e by EPA industry sector
Nationwide parents with similar GHGRP profiles
Three EPA GHGRP-derived peer sets for Si Group USA Holdings (usha). The CO₂e neighbourhood chart above shows poles; these links are navigable comparison paths beyond Other browse pages.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (100K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (2 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (50K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Si Group USA Holdings (usha)'s emissions profile
- Si Group USA Holdings (usha) runs mid-intensity per facility (50K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Other sector on the Other industry page.
- It ranks #1070 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Other emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.