EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Power Plants

Sjv Biodiesel - lower-footprint GHGRP parent

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), a smaller reporting parent: 13K MT CO₂e from 1 site in 1 state (2023).

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
13K
Reporting facilities
1
States covered
1
Overall rank
#2183
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

13K MT CO₂e · 2023

According to the EPA GHGRP, Sjv Biodiesel reported 13K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 1 facility in 1 state (ranks #2,183 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions decreased 79% over the tracked period.

  • Overall rank #2183 of 2,289
  • #432 in Power Plants
  • -78.9% since 2011

Sjv Biodiesel vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

12,803 2183rd of 2289 higher than 106 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Sjv Biodiesel spreads its footprint vs Power Plants peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Power Plants companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (19 facilities, 26.77M MT).

Median split: 19 facilities, 26.77M MT CO₂e among Power Plants peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 01020304050 0M20M40M60M80M100M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Power Plants
Median split: 19 facilities, 26.77M MT CO₂e among Power Plants peers.

You are here: Sjv Biodiesel.

Power Plants peer footprint table: Sjv Biodiesel, 1 facilities, 0.01M MT CO2e. Vistra, 40 facilities, 86.32M MT CO2e. The Southern, 26 facilities, 78.01M MT CO2e. Duke Energy, 39 facilities, 65.01M MT CO2e. CPN Management, 43 facilities, 47.58M MT CO2e. Nextera Energy, 19 facilities, 45.57M MT CO2e. American Electric Power CO, 22 facilities, 44.72M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 27 facilities, 39.8M MT CO2e. US Government, 21 facilities, 38.21M MT CO2e. Entergy, 23 facilities, 33.86M MT CO2e. Xcel Energy, 28 facilities, 29.03M MT CO2e. PPL, 6 facilities, 26.77M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 22 facilities, 25.19M MT CO2e. DTE Energy, 12 facilities, 22.31M MT CO2e. NRG Energy, 14 facilities, 22.1M MT CO2e. Ameren, 11 facilities, 19.88M MT CO2e. Evergy, 12 facilities, 19.87M MT CO2e. Lightstone Generation, 4 facilities, 19.14M MT CO2e. Talen Energy, 11 facilities, 17.72M MT CO2e. Associated Electric Cooperative, 7 facilities, 15.57M MT CO2e. Aes, 8 facilities, 15.45M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent sjv-biodiesel · 2023 #2183 · 13K MT

CO2E-THIN · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-SINGLE · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS · TREND-CUT · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-THIN 13K MT
  • BOTTOM-DECILE #2183/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH County of Kootenai Id… · Waste
  • FAC-SINGLE 1 facility
  • SPAN-HOME 1 state
  • SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS Power Plants
  • TREND-CUT −79% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: County of Kootenai Idaho · Waste (±12 MT)

Lower-footprint parent stamps from this GHGRP rollup, comparative context only, not a compliance rating.

2023 mixed non-CO₂ parent desk

Non-CO₂ gases are 1.5% of 13K MT CO₂e in 2023, with CH₄ at 0.5% and N₂O at 1%, and neither gas dominates alone. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
98.5%
13K MT
CH₄
0.5%
60 MT
N₂O
1%
134 MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Sjv Biodiesel

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MHawkeye Energy Greenp… · Pow…13KHigh Sierra · Power Plants ·…13KAux Sable Midstream · Natura…13KCounty of Kootenai Id… · Was…13KSjv Biodiesel · Power Plants…13KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Sjv Biodiesel · May 2026

Emissions decline across reporting years

Sjv Biodiesel - declining annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
13K MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0M0.02M0.04M0.06M0.08M 2011201320152017201920212023 0.01M

Sjv Biodiesel annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Sjv Biodiesel reported 13K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 61K MT in 2011 - a decline of 78.9% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Facilities (1)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
Pixley Cogen Partners, LLC
Power Plants
Pixley, CA
13K

Nationwide peers for a lower-footprint parent

Comparison paths for a smaller GHGRP parent: nearest CO₂e totals, similar facility counts, and intensity neighbors beyond Power Plants browse pages.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Sjv Biodiesel's emissions profile

  • Sjv Biodiesel runs low-intensity per facility (13K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Power Plants sector on the Power Plants industry page.
  • It ranks #2183 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Power Plants emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.