EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Metals

Ssab US Holding - top-third GHGRP parent

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 2 facilities across 2 states (631K MT CO₂e in 2023).

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
631K
Reporting facilities
2
States covered
2
Overall rank
#426
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

631K MT CO₂e · 2023

According to the EPA GHGRP, Ssab US Holding reported 631K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 2 facilities in 2 states (ranks #426 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions decreased 7% over the tracked period.

  • Overall rank #426 of 2,289
  • #13 in Metals
  • -6.5% since 2011

Ssab US Holding vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

631,273 426th of 2289 higher than 1,863 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Ssab US Holding spreads its footprint vs Metals peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 20 Metals companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (4 facilities, 0.84M MT).

Median split: 4 facilities, 0.84M MT CO₂e among Metals peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 20 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 0102030 0M10M20M30M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Metals
Median split: 4 facilities, 0.84M MT CO₂e among Metals peers.

You are here: Ssab US Holding.

Metals peer footprint table: Ssab US Holding, 2 facilities, 0.63M MT CO2e. Cleveland-Cliffs, 26 facilities, 27.37M MT CO2e. US Steel, 13 facilities, 19.41M MT CO2e. Nucor, 24 facilities, 5.57M MT CO2e. Alcoa, 3 facilities, 5.16M MT CO2e. Suncoke Energy, 5 facilities, 3.27M MT CO2e. Steel Dynamics, 10 facilities, 2.54M MT CO2e. Century Aluminum, 3 facilities, 0.99M MT CO2e. Globe Specialty Metals, 4 facilities, 0.92M MT CO2e. Commercial Metals, 8 facilities, 0.86M MT CO2e. Gerdau USA, 9 facilities, 0.84M MT CO2e. Gramercy Holdings I, 1 facilities, 0.8M MT CO2e. Novelis, 6 facilities, 0.63M MT CO2e. Arconic, 4 facilities, 0.63M MT CO2e. Arcelormittal Holdings, 2 facilities, 0.62M MT CO2e. Am/ns Calvert, 1 facilities, 0.56M MT CO2e. Bluescope Steel Investments, 1 facilities, 0.44M MT CO2e. Pinnacle Mountain Holding Co III, 1 facilities, 0.38M MT CO2e. Proterial America, 2 facilities, 0.38M MT CO2e. Magnitude 7 Metals, 1 facilities, 0.38M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent ssab-us-holding · 2023 #426 · 631K MT

CO2E-MODEST · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-PAIR · SECTOR-METALS · TREND-DOWN · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-MODEST 631K MT
  • UPPER-Q #426/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH Novelis · Metals
  • FAC-PAIR 2 facilities
  • SPAN-PAIR 2 states
  • SECTOR-METALS Metals
  • TREND-DOWN −7% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: Novelis · Metals (±449 MT)

Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.

2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book

This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 631K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
99.9%
631K MT
CH₄
0%
188 MT
N₂O
0%
224 MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Ssab US Holding

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MSsab US Holding · Metals · t…631KNovelis · Metals · near631KArconic · Metals · near628KDaikin Holdings Ameri… · Che…626KRed Apple Group · Chemicals …625KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Ssab US Holding · May 2026

Largest sites in a top-third parent book

Ssab US Holding - top sites (MT CO₂e)

SSAB ALABAMA INCORPORATED336KSSAB Iowa Inc.295K

Ssab US Holding's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

High-emitter reporting timeline

Ssab US Holding - high-emitter annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
631K MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0.55M0.6M0.65M0.7M0.75M 2011201320152017201920212023 0.63M

Ssab US Holding annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Ssab US Holding reported 631K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 675K MT in 2011 - a decline of 6.5% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Facilities (2)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
SSAB ALABAMA INCORPORATED
Metals
AXIS, AL
336K
SSAB Iowa Inc.
Metals
MUSCATINE, IA
295K

Where Ssab US Holding's reported CO₂e sits by state

53.2% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Alabama (1 site) ; next is Iowa at 46.8% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.

AL336KIA295K
EPA GHGRP · Ssab US Holding facility CO₂e by state · May 2026

Ssab US Holding reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent

Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (631K MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Ssab US Holding's emissions profile

  • Ssab US Holding runs high-intensity per facility (316K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Metals sector on the Metals industry page.
  • It ranks #426 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Metals emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.