EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Other
Stone Canyon Industries Holdings - top-third GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 4 facilities across 4 states (244K MT CO₂e in 2023).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 244K
- Reporting facilities
- 4
- States covered
- 4
- Overall rank
- #678
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, Stone Canyon Industries Holdings reported 244K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 4 facilities in 4 states (ranks #678 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions decreased 41% over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #678 of 2,289
- #89 in Other
- -41.4% since 2011
Stone Canyon Industries Holdings vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
243,597 678th of 2289 higher than 1,611 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Stone Canyon Industries Holdings spreads its footprint vs Other peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Other companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 2.28M MT).
You are here: Stone Canyon Industries Holdings.
Other peer footprint table: Stone Canyon Industries Holdings, 4 facilities, 0.24M MT CO2e. Prairie State Energy Campus Management, 1 facilities, 11.46M MT CO2e. Marathon Petroleum, 4 facilities, 7.11M MT CO2e. Archer Daniels Midland, 15 facilities, 6.67M MT CO2e. Consol Energy, 4 facilities, 6.53M MT CO2e. American Consolidated Natural Resources, 6 facilities, 6.29M MT CO2e. Hummel Station, 1 facilities, 2.91M MT CO2e. Arch Resources, 5 facilities, 2.83M MT CO2e. US Government, 51 facilities, 2.78M MT CO2e. Poet, 28 facilities, 2.66M MT CO2e. Cargill, 27 facilities, 2.51M MT CO2e. Alliance Holdings Gp, 5 facilities, 2.28M MT CO2e. Valero Energy, 12 facilities, 2.24M MT CO2e. Tyson Foods, 31 facilities, 1.72M MT CO2e. Iron Senergy Holding, 1 facilities, 1.64M MT CO2e. Karnavati Holdings, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. Hatfield Metallurgical Intermediate Holdings, 1 facilities, 1.38M MT CO2e. Alpha Metallurgical Resources, 9 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e. Hallador Energy, 2 facilities, 1.32M MT CO2e. Green Plains, 11 facilities, 1.3M MT CO2e. Coronado Group, 3 facilities, 1.28M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent stone-canyon-industries-holdings · 2023 #678 · 244K MT
CO2E-MODEST · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-MULTI · SECTOR-OTHER · TREND-CUT · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MODEST 244K MT
- MID-PACK #678/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Millennium Power CO · Power Plants
- FAC-PAIR 4 facilities
- SPAN-MULTI 4 states
- SECTOR-OTHER Other
- TREND-CUT −41% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Millennium Power CO · Power Plants (±211 MT)
Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.
2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book
This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.6% of 244K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.4%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 99.6%
- 243K MT
- CH₄
- 0.1%
- 344 MT
- N₂O
- 0.2%
- 558 MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Stone Canyon Industries Holdings
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest sites in a top-third parent book
Stone Canyon Industries Holdings - top sites (MT CO₂e)
Stone Canyon Industries Holdings's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Emissions decline across reporting years
Stone Canyon Industries Holdings - declining annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 244K MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Stone Canyon Industries Holdings annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
Stone Canyon Industries Holdings reported 244K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 416K MT in 2011 - a decline of 41.4% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Multi-site facilities (4)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| MORTON SALT Other MANISTEE, MI | MANISTEE, MI | 95K |
| MORTON SALT, INC. Chemicals RITTMAN, OH | RITTMAN, OH | 75K |
| MORTON SALT, INC. Other SILVER SPRINGS, NY | SILVER SPRINGS, NY | 54K |
| Morton Salt, Inc. Other South Hutchinson, KS | South Hutchinson, KS | 19K |
Where Stone Canyon Industries Holdings's reported CO₂e sits by state
38.9% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Michigan (1 site) ; next is Ohio at 30.8% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.
Stone Canyon Industries Holdings reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state
Stone Canyon Industries Holdings's reported CO₂e by EPA sector
Top sector Other is 69.2% of this parent's facility CO₂e (3 sites) ; Chemicals follows at 30.8% . Sector labels are EPA GHGRP facility industry_sector values.
Stone Canyon Industries Holdings reported facility CO₂e by EPA industry sector
Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent
Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (244K MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (244K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (4 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (61K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Stone Canyon Industries Holdings's emissions profile
- Stone Canyon Industries Holdings runs mid-intensity per facility (61K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Other sector on the Other industry page.
- It ranks #678 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Other emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.