EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Pulp and Paper
Tak Investment - per-facility CO₂e intensity
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), Scope 1 emissions reported across 2 reporting facilities in 2 states.
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 83K
- Reporting facilities
- 2
- States covered
- 2
- Overall rank
- #1179
Data updated May 2026
Tak Investment averages 41K MT CO₂e per reporting facility (low-intensity NTILE) on 83K MT total in 2023.
- Overall rank #1179 of 2,289
- #36 in Pulp and Paper
- +139.0% since 2020
Tak Investment vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
82,903 1179th of 2289 higher than 1,110 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Tak Investment spreads its footprint vs Pulp and Paper peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Pulp and Paper companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (4 facilities, 0.65M MT).
You are here: Tak Investment.
Pulp and Paper peer footprint table: Tak Investment, 2 facilities, 0.08M MT CO2e. Koch Industries, 20 facilities, 6.32M MT CO2e. Westrock, 24 facilities, 5.74M MT CO2e. International Paper, 21 facilities, 5.08M MT CO2e. Graphic Packaging Holding, 6 facilities, 1.52M MT CO2e. The Procter & Gamble, 6 facilities, 1.51M MT CO2e. Packaging CORP of America, 8 facilities, 1.5M MT CO2e. Domtar, 7 facilities, 1.44M MT CO2e. Kimberly-Clark, 8 facilities, 1.03M MT CO2e. Nd Paper, 4 facilities, 0.77M MT CO2e. Billerud Americas, 3 facilities, 0.65M MT CO2e. Clearwater Paper, 4 facilities, 0.65M MT CO2e. Ahlstrom-Munksjo North America Specialty Solutions, 4 facilities, 0.59M MT CO2e. Sappi North America, 3 facilities, 0.52M MT CO2e. Pratt Industries, 5 facilities, 0.51M MT CO2e. Sylvamo North America, 2 facilities, 0.49M MT CO2e. New-Indy Jv, 2 facilities, 0.47M MT CO2e. Hig Capital, 1 facilities, 0.46M MT CO2e. Pixelle Specialty Solutions, 3 facilities, 0.43M MT CO2e. Evergreen Packaging Group Holdings, 1 facilities, 0.4M MT CO2e. Nippon Paper Industries CO, 1 facilities, 0.38M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent tak-investment · 2023 #1179 · 83K MT
CO2E-THIN · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-PAIR · SECTOR-PULP-AND-PAP · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-THIN 83K MT
- MID-PACK #1179/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Western New York Ener… · Other
- FAC-PAIR 2 facilities
- SPAN-PAIR 2 states
- SECTOR-PULP-AND-PAP Pulp and Paper
- TREND-SURGE +139% since 2020
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Western New York Energy · Other (±81 MT)
Instrument codes from this parent’s EPA GHGRP rollup: CO₂e band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend, and book completeness. Not an EPA grade or compliance rating.
2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book
This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 83K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 99.9%
- 83K MT
- CH₄
- 0%
- 39 MT
- N₂O
- 0.1%
- 46 MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Tak Investment
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest facilities by reported emissions
Tak Investment - top facilities (MT CO₂e)
Tak Investment's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Emissions growth across reporting years
Tak Investment - rising annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2020–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 83K MT
- 4 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Tak Investment annual reported GHG emissions, 2020–2023
Tak Investment reported 83K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 35K MT in 2020 - a rise of 139.0% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Facilities (2)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| ST Tissue - Franklin Facility Pulp and Paper Franklin, VA | Franklin, VA | 50K |
| ST Paper 1 LLC Pulp and Paper Duluth, MN | Duluth, MN | 33K |
Where Tak Investment's reported CO₂e sits by state
60.4% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Virginia (1 site) ; next is Minnesota at 39.6% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.
Tak Investment reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state
Nationwide parents with similar GHGRP profiles
Three EPA GHGRP-derived peer sets for Tak Investment. The CO₂e neighbourhood chart above shows poles; these links are navigable comparison paths beyond Pulp and Paper browse pages.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (83K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (2 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (41K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Tak Investment's emissions profile
- Tak Investment runs low-intensity per facility (41K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Pulp and Paper sector on the Pulp and Paper industry page.
- It ranks #1179 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Pulp and Paper emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.