EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems

Third Coast King’s Quay Holdings - per-facility CO₂e intensity

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), high per-facility intensity (129K MT/site) across 1 reporting facility in 1 state.

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
129K
Reporting facilities
1
States covered
1
Overall rank
#927
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

129K MT CO₂e · 2023

Third Coast King’s Quay Holdings averages 129K MT CO₂e per reporting facility (high-intensity NTILE) on 129K MT total in 2023.

  • Overall rank #927 of 2,289
  • #70 in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
  • +39.0% since 2022

Third Coast King’s Quay Holdings vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

128,957 927th of 2289 higher than 1,362 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Third Coast King’s Quay Holdings spreads its footprint vs Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (21 facilities, 2.77M MT).

Median split: 21 facilities, 2.77M MT CO₂e among Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 050100150200 0M5M10M15M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Median split: 21 facilities, 2.77M MT CO₂e among Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers.

You are here: Third Coast King’s Quay Holdings.

Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peer footprint table: Third Coast King’s Quay Holdings, 1 facilities, 0.13M MT CO2e. Cheniere Energy, 5 facilities, 9.73M MT CO2e. Energy Transfer, 129 facilities, 8.89M MT CO2e. Hilcorp Energy, 18 facilities, 8.26M MT CO2e. Kinder Morgan, 169 facilities, 8.24M MT CO2e. Enterprise Products Partners, 43 facilities, 7.79M MT CO2e. Enbridge (us), 80 facilities, 5.72M MT CO2e. The Williams Cos, 59 facilities, 5.48M MT CO2e. Transcanada Pipeline USA, 76 facilities, 4.45M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 5 facilities, 3.26M MT CO2e. Venture Global LNG, 1 facilities, 2.84M MT CO2e. Sempra Energy, 5 facilities, 2.77M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 56 facilities, 2.3M MT CO2e. Targa Resources, 21 facilities, 2.22M MT CO2e. GIP Pilot Acquisition Partners, 26 facilities, 2.08M MT CO2e. Loews, 41 facilities, 1.94M MT CO2e. Occidental Petroleum, 19 facilities, 1.55M MT CO2e. Enlink Midstream, 11 facilities, 1.5M MT CO2e. Oneok, 23 facilities, 1.44M MT CO2e. Ecoelectrica, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. IKAV Impact USA, 4 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent third-coast-king-s-quay-holdings · 2023 #927 · 129K MT

CO2E-MODEST · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-SINGLE · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-MODEST 129K MT
  • MID-PACK #927/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH City of Jacksonville… · Waste
  • FAC-SINGLE 1 facility
  • SPAN-HOME 1 state
  • SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN Petroleum and Nat…
  • TREND-SURGE +39% since 2022
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: City of Jacksonville Texas · Waste (±490 MT)

Instrument codes from this parent’s EPA GHGRP rollup: CO₂e band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend, and book completeness. Not an EPA grade or compliance rating.

2023 methane-weighted parent mix

Methane leads the non-CO₂ share for Third Coast King’s Quay Holdings: CH₄ is 2.2% of 129K MT CO₂e in 2023 (N₂O 0.1%). Non-CO₂ gases total 2.3%. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
97.7%
126K MT
CH₄
2.2%
3K MT
N₂O
0.1%
100 MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Third Coast King’s Quay Holdings

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MColumbus Georgia Cons… · Was…130KThird Coast King’s Qu… · Pet…129KCity of Jacksonville… · Wast…128KNan Ya Plastics CORP… · Othe…128K600 Land · Waste · near128KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Third Coast King’s Quay Holdings · May 2026

Emissions growth across reporting years

Third Coast King’s Quay Holdings - rising annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2022–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
129K MT
2 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0.08M0.09M0.1M0.11M0.12M0.13M0.14M 20222023 0.13M

Third Coast King’s Quay Holdings annual reported GHG emissions, 2022–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Third Coast King’s Quay Holdings reported 129K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 93K MT in 2022 - a rise of 39.0% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Facilities (1)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
King's Quay
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Offshore, LA
129K

Nationwide parents with similar intensity profiles

Intensity-led peer sets around 129K MT per facility, plus nearest totals and facility-book matches.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Third Coast King’s Quay Holdings's emissions profile

  • Third Coast King’s Quay Holdings runs high-intensity per facility (129K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems sector on the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems industry page.
  • It ranks #927 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.