EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Waste

Trans-Jordan Cities Ut - rising reported GHG

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), Scope 1 emissions reported across 1 reporting facility in 1 state.

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
86K
Reporting facilities
1
States covered
1
Overall rank
#1156
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

86K MT CO₂e · 2023

Trans-Jordan Cities Ut reported emissions rose 204.1% since 2011 to 86K MT CO₂e in 2023.

  • Overall rank #1156 of 2,289
  • #212 in Waste
  • +204.1% since 2011

Trans-Jordan Cities Ut vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

85,903 1156th of 2289 higher than 1,133 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Trans-Jordan Cities Ut spreads its footprint vs Waste peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Waste companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 0.7M MT).

Median split: 5 facilities, 0.7M MT CO₂e among Waste peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 050100150200250 0M5M10M15M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Waste
Median split: 5 facilities, 0.7M MT CO₂e among Waste peers.

You are here: Trans-Jordan Cities Ut.

Waste peer footprint table: Trans-Jordan Cities Ut, 1 facilities, 0.09M MT CO2e. Waste Management, 225 facilities, 11.65M MT CO2e. Republic Services, 177 facilities, 10.72M MT CO2e. Covanta Holding, 22 facilities, 4.2M MT CO2e. Waste Connections US, 40 facilities, 3.63M MT CO2e. Gfl Environmental Holdings (us), 30 facilities, 2.45M MT CO2e. Wheelabrator Technologies Holdings, 12 facilities, 2.22M MT CO2e. Rumpke Consolidated Cos, 9 facilities, 1.69M MT CO2e. County of Orange California, 5 facilities, 1.13M MT CO2e. County of Lycoming Pennsylvania, 1 facilities, 0.9M MT CO2e. County of Pinellas Florida, 2 facilities, 0.77M MT CO2e. Apex Environmental, 1 facilities, 0.7M MT CO2e. County of Brevard Florida, 1 facilities, 0.67M MT CO2e. City of El Paso Texas, 2 facilities, 0.54M MT CO2e. Waste Connections, 8 facilities, 0.51M MT CO2e. City of Baton Rouge Louisiana, 2 facilities, 0.51M MT CO2e. Solid Waste Authority of Palm Beach County Florida, 3 facilities, 0.5M MT CO2e. City of Dallas Texas, 1 facilities, 0.48M MT CO2e. Casella Waste Systems, 9 facilities, 0.46M MT CO2e. County of Polk Florida, 1 facilities, 0.43M MT CO2e. US Government, 9 facilities, 0.42M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent trans-jordan-cities-ut · 2023 #1156 · 86K MT

CO2E-THIN · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-SINGLE · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-WASTE · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-THIN 86K MT
  • MID-PACK #1156/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH Northeast Nebraska So… · Waste
  • FAC-SINGLE 1 facility
  • SPAN-HOME 1 state
  • SECTOR-WASTE Waste
  • TREND-SURGE +204% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: Northeast Nebraska Solid Waste Coalition · Waste (±6 MT)

Instrument codes from this parent’s EPA GHGRP rollup: CO₂e band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend, and book completeness. Not an EPA grade or compliance rating.

2023 methane-weighted parent mix

Methane leads the non-CO₂ share for Trans-Jordan Cities Ut: CH₄ is 99.9% of 86K MT CO₂e in 2023 (N₂O 0%). Non-CO₂ gases total 99.9%. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
0.1%
120 MT
CH₄
99.9%
86K MT
N₂O
-
n/r

CO₂e neighbourhood around Trans-Jordan Cities Ut

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MCommonwealth of Massa… · Oth…86KOlam Holdings Ptnr · Other ·…86KNortheast Nebraska So… · Was…86KTrans-Jordan Cities Ut · Was…86KSalinas Valley Solid… · Wast…86KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Trans-Jordan Cities Ut · May 2026

Emissions growth across reporting years

Trans-Jordan Cities Ut - rising annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
86K MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0.02M0.04M0.06M0.08M0.1M0.12M0.14M 2011201320152017201920212023 0.09M

Trans-Jordan Cities Ut annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Trans-Jordan Cities Ut reported 86K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 28K MT in 2011 - a rise of 204.1% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Facilities (1)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
TRANS-JORDAN LANDFILL
Waste
South Jordan, UT
86K

Nationwide parents with similar GHGRP profiles

Three EPA GHGRP-derived peer sets for Trans-Jordan Cities Ut. The CO₂e neighbourhood chart above shows poles; these links are navigable comparison paths beyond Waste browse pages.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Trans-Jordan Cities Ut's emissions profile

  • Trans-Jordan Cities Ut runs mid-intensity per facility (86K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Waste sector on the Waste industry page.
  • It ranks #1156 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Waste emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.