EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Metals

Tredegar - lower-footprint GHGRP parent

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), a smaller reporting parent: 47K MT CO₂e from 2 sites in 2 states (2023).

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
47K
Reporting facilities
2
States covered
2
Overall rank
#1587
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

47K MT CO₂e · 2023

According to the EPA GHGRP, Tredegar reported 47K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 2 facilities in 2 states (ranks #1,587 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions increased 86% over the tracked period.

  • Overall rank #1587 of 2,289
  • #84 in Metals
  • +85.8% since 2013

Tredegar vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

47,452 1587th of 2289 higher than 702 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Tredegar spreads its footprint vs Metals peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Metals companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (3 facilities, 0.8M MT).

Median split: 3 facilities, 0.8M MT CO₂e among Metals peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 0102030 0M10M20M30M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Metals
Median split: 3 facilities, 0.8M MT CO₂e among Metals peers.

You are here: Tredegar.

Metals peer footprint table: Tredegar, 2 facilities, 0.05M MT CO2e. Cleveland-Cliffs, 26 facilities, 27.37M MT CO2e. US Steel, 13 facilities, 19.41M MT CO2e. Nucor, 24 facilities, 5.57M MT CO2e. Alcoa, 3 facilities, 5.16M MT CO2e. Suncoke Energy, 5 facilities, 3.27M MT CO2e. Steel Dynamics, 10 facilities, 2.54M MT CO2e. Century Aluminum, 3 facilities, 0.99M MT CO2e. Globe Specialty Metals, 4 facilities, 0.92M MT CO2e. Commercial Metals, 8 facilities, 0.86M MT CO2e. Gerdau USA, 9 facilities, 0.84M MT CO2e. Gramercy Holdings I, 1 facilities, 0.8M MT CO2e. Ssab US Holding, 2 facilities, 0.63M MT CO2e. Novelis, 6 facilities, 0.63M MT CO2e. Arconic, 4 facilities, 0.63M MT CO2e. Arcelormittal Holdings, 2 facilities, 0.62M MT CO2e. Am/ns Calvert, 1 facilities, 0.56M MT CO2e. Bluescope Steel Investments, 1 facilities, 0.44M MT CO2e. Pinnacle Mountain Holding Co III, 1 facilities, 0.38M MT CO2e. Proterial America, 2 facilities, 0.38M MT CO2e. Magnitude 7 Metals, 1 facilities, 0.38M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent tredegar · 2023 #1587 · 47K MT

CO2E-THIN · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-PAIR · SECTOR-METALS · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-THIN 47K MT
  • MID-PACK #1587/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH Yakima County Public · Waste
  • FAC-PAIR 2 facilities
  • SPAN-PAIR 2 states
  • SECTOR-METALS Metals
  • TREND-SURGE +86% since 2013
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: Yakima County Public · Waste (±14 MT)

Lower-footprint parent stamps from this GHGRP rollup, comparative context only, not a compliance rating.

2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book

This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 47K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
99.9%
47K MT
CH₄
0%
23 MT
N₂O
0.1%
27 MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Tredegar

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MCounty of New Hanover… · Was…48KYakima County Public · Waste…47KTredegar · Metals · this par…47KMcpherson Board of Pu… · Pow…47KQuad/graphics · Pulp and Pa……47KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Tredegar · May 2026

Reporting sites by CO₂e

Tredegar - site CO₂e (MT)

Bonnell Aluminum, Inc.30KBonnell Aluminum, Inc.18K

Tredegar's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Emissions growth across reporting years

Tredegar - rising annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2013–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
47K MT
11 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0.02M0.03M0.04M0.05M0.06M0.07M 20132014201520162017201820192020202120222023 0.05M

Tredegar annual reported GHG emissions, 2013–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Tredegar reported 47K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 26K MT in 2013 - a rise of 85.8% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Facilities (2)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
Bonnell Aluminum, Inc.
Metals
Carthage, TN
30K
Bonnell Aluminum, Inc.
Metals
Newnan, GA
18K

Where Tredegar's reported CO₂e sits by state

62.5% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Tennessee (1 site) ; next is Georgia at 37.5% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.

TN30KGA18K
EPA GHGRP · Tredegar facility CO₂e by state · May 2026

Tredegar reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Nationwide peers for a lower-footprint parent

Comparison paths for a smaller GHGRP parent: nearest CO₂e totals, similar facility counts, and intensity neighbors beyond Metals browse pages.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Tredegar's emissions profile

  • Tredegar runs low-intensity per facility (24K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Metals sector on the Metals industry page.
  • It ranks #1587 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Metals emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.