EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems

Unit - rising reported GHG

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), Scope 1 emissions reported across 4 reporting facilities in 2 states.

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
178K
Reporting facilities
4
States covered
2
Overall rank
#782
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

178K MT CO₂e · 2023

Unit reported emissions rose 52.9% since 2011 to 178K MT CO₂e in 2023.

  • Overall rank #782 of 2,289
  • #59 in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
  • +52.9% since 2011

Unit vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

177,503 782nd of 2289 higher than 1,507 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Unit spreads its footprint vs Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (21 facilities, 2.77M MT).

Median split: 21 facilities, 2.77M MT CO₂e among Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 050100150200 0M5M10M15M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Median split: 21 facilities, 2.77M MT CO₂e among Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers.

You are here: Unit.

Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peer footprint table: Unit, 4 facilities, 0.18M MT CO2e. Cheniere Energy, 5 facilities, 9.73M MT CO2e. Energy Transfer, 129 facilities, 8.89M MT CO2e. Hilcorp Energy, 18 facilities, 8.26M MT CO2e. Kinder Morgan, 169 facilities, 8.24M MT CO2e. Enterprise Products Partners, 43 facilities, 7.79M MT CO2e. Enbridge (us), 80 facilities, 5.72M MT CO2e. The Williams Cos, 59 facilities, 5.48M MT CO2e. Transcanada Pipeline USA, 76 facilities, 4.45M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 5 facilities, 3.26M MT CO2e. Venture Global LNG, 1 facilities, 2.84M MT CO2e. Sempra Energy, 5 facilities, 2.77M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 56 facilities, 2.3M MT CO2e. Targa Resources, 21 facilities, 2.22M MT CO2e. GIP Pilot Acquisition Partners, 26 facilities, 2.08M MT CO2e. Loews, 41 facilities, 1.94M MT CO2e. Occidental Petroleum, 19 facilities, 1.55M MT CO2e. Enlink Midstream, 11 facilities, 1.5M MT CO2e. Oneok, 23 facilities, 1.44M MT CO2e. Ecoelectrica, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. IKAV Impact USA, 4 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent unit · 2023 #782 · 178K MT

CO2E-MODEST · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-PAIR · SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-MODEST 178K MT
  • MID-PACK #782/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH Elite Octane · Other
  • FAC-PAIR 4 facilities
  • SPAN-PAIR 2 states
  • SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN Petroleum and Nat…
  • TREND-SURGE +53% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: Elite Octane · Other (±243 MT)

Instrument codes from this parent’s EPA GHGRP rollup: CO₂e band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend, and book completeness. Not an EPA grade or compliance rating.

2023 methane-weighted parent mix

Methane leads the non-CO₂ share for Unit: CH₄ is 3.2% of 178K MT CO₂e in 2023 (N₂O 0.3%). Non-CO₂ gases total 3.4%. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
96.6%
171K MT
CH₄
3.2%
6K MT
N₂O
0.3%
495 MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Unit

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MPhoenix Paper Wicklif… · Pul…178KCorning · Minerals · near178KElite Octane · Other · near178KUnit · Petroleum a… · this p…178KTransworld Oil USA · Petrole…177KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Unit · May 2026

Largest facilities by reported emissions

Unit - top facilities (MT CO₂e)

Superior Pipeline Company - …66KCashion Gas Plant37KBellmon Gas Plant37KHOBART PLANT37K

Unit's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Emissions growth across reporting years

Unit - rising annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
178K MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0.1M0.15M0.2M0.25M0.3M 2011201320152017201920212023 0.18M

Unit annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Unit reported 178K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 116K MT in 2011 - a rise of 52.9% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Multi-site facilities (4)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
Superior Pipeline Company - Reeding Plant
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Cashion, OK
66K
Cashion Gas Plant
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Cashion, OK
37K
Bellmon Gas Plant
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Tonkawa, OK
37K
HOBART PLANT
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
CANADIAN, TX
37K

Where Unit's reported CO₂e sits by state

79.1% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Oklahoma (3 sites) ; next is Texas at 20.9% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.

OK140KTX37K
EPA GHGRP · Unit facility CO₂e by state · May 2026

Unit reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Nationwide parents with similar GHGRP profiles

Three EPA GHGRP-derived peer sets for Unit. The CO₂e neighbourhood chart above shows poles; these links are navigable comparison paths beyond Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems browse pages.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Unit's emissions profile

  • Unit runs mid-intensity per facility (44K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems sector on the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems industry page.
  • It ranks #782 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.