EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Power Plants

Xcel Energy - top-third GHGRP parent

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 28 facilities across 6 states (29.0M MT CO₂e in 2023).

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
29.0M
Reporting facilities
28
States covered
6
Overall rank
#11
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

29.0M MT CO₂e · 2023

According to the EPA GHGRP, Xcel Energy reported 29.0M MT CO₂e in 2023 across 28 facilities in 6 states (ranks in the top 1% of U.S. corporate GHG emitters (#11 of 2,289)) Emissions decreased 28% over the tracked period.

  • Overall rank #11 of 2,289
  • #7 in Power Plants
  • -28.3% since 2011

Xcel Energy vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

29,032,344 11th of 2289 higher than 2,278 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Xcel Energy spreads its footprint vs Power Plants peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 20 Power Plants companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (21 facilities, 29.03M MT).

Median split: 21 facilities, 29.03M MT CO₂e among Power Plants peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 20 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 01020304050 0M20M40M60M80M100M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Power Plants
Median split: 21 facilities, 29.03M MT CO₂e among Power Plants peers.

You are here: Xcel Energy.

Power Plants peer footprint table: Xcel Energy, 28 facilities, 29.03M MT CO2e. Vistra, 40 facilities, 86.32M MT CO2e. The Southern, 26 facilities, 78.01M MT CO2e. Duke Energy, 39 facilities, 65.01M MT CO2e. CPN Management, 43 facilities, 47.58M MT CO2e. Nextera Energy, 19 facilities, 45.57M MT CO2e. American Electric Power CO, 22 facilities, 44.72M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 27 facilities, 39.8M MT CO2e. US Government, 21 facilities, 38.21M MT CO2e. Entergy, 23 facilities, 33.86M MT CO2e. PPL, 6 facilities, 26.77M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 22 facilities, 25.19M MT CO2e. DTE Energy, 12 facilities, 22.31M MT CO2e. NRG Energy, 14 facilities, 22.1M MT CO2e. Ameren, 11 facilities, 19.88M MT CO2e. Evergy, 12 facilities, 19.87M MT CO2e. Lightstone Generation, 4 facilities, 19.14M MT CO2e. Talen Energy, 11 facilities, 17.72M MT CO2e. Associated Electric Cooperative, 7 facilities, 15.57M MT CO2e. Aes, 8 facilities, 15.45M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent xcel-energy · 2023 #11 · 29.0M MT

CO2E-LARGE · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-FLEET · SPAN-MULTI · SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS · TREND-CUT · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-LARGE 29.0M MT
  • TOP-DECILE #11/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH Marathon Petroleum · Natural Gas a…
  • FAC-FLEET 28 facilities
  • SPAN-MULTI 6 states
  • SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS Power Plants
  • TREND-CUT −28% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: Marathon Petroleum · Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids Suppliers (±281K MT)

Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.

2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book

This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.6% of 29.0M MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.4%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
99.6%
28.9M MT
CH₄
0%
14K MT
N₂O
0.4%
102K MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Xcel Energy

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MXcel Energy · Power Plants ·…29.0MMarathon Petroleum · Natural…28.8MDominion Energy · Power Plan…28.5MCleveland-Cliffs · Metals · …27.4MPPL · Power Plants · near26.8MPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Xcel Energy · May 2026

Largest sites in a top-third parent book

Xcel Energy - top sites (MT CO₂e)

Comanche (470)7.0MHarrington Station3.5MPawnee3.1MTolk Station2.8MFort St. Vrain1.7MCherokee1.5MJones Station1.1MRocky Mountain Energy Center1.1M

Xcel Energy's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Emissions decline across reporting years

Xcel Energy - declining annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
29.0M MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
25M30M35M40M45M 2011201320152017201920212023 29M

Xcel Energy annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Xcel Energy reported 29.0M MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 40.5M MT in 2011 - a decline of 28.3% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Wide facility book (28)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
Comanche (470)
Power Plants
PUEBLO, CO
7.0M
Harrington Station
Power Plants
AMARILLO, TX
3.5M
Pawnee
Power Plants
Brush, CO
3.1M
Tolk Station
Power Plants
MULESHOE, TX
2.8M
Fort St. Vrain
Power Plants
PLATTEVILLE, CO
1.7M
Cherokee
Power Plants
DENVER, CO
1.5M
Jones Station
Power Plants
LUBBOCK, TX
1.1M
Rocky Mountain Energy Center
Power Plants
KEENESBURG, CO
1.1M
Allen S King
Power Plants
OAK PARK HEIGHTS, MN
999K
High Bridge
Power Plants
SAINT PAUL, MN
990K
Riverside (1927)
Power Plants
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
951K
Cunningham
Power Plants
HOBBS, NM
866K
Black Dog
Power Plants
BURNSVILLE, MN
825K
Nichols Station
Power Plants
AMARILLO, TX
741K
Maddox
Power Plants
HOBBS, NM
448K
Plant X
Power Plants
EARTH, TX
387K
Blue Spruce Energy Center
Power Plants
AURORA, CO
270K
Manchief Generating Station
Power Plants
BRUSH, CO
206K
Angus Anson
Power Plants
SIOUX FALLS, SD
161K
Red Wing Plant
Power Plants
Red Wing, MN
103K
PUBLIC SERVICE CO DENVER STEAM PLT
Power Plants
DENVER, CO
76K
Key City/Wilmarth Plant
Power Plants
Mankato, MN
70K
Inver Hills Generating Plant
Power Plants
Inver Grove Heights, MN
65K
Blue Lake Generating Plant
Power Plants
SHAKOPEE, MN
49K
French Island
Power Plants
LA CROSSE, WI
36K
Wheaton Generating Plant
Power Plants
EAU CLAIRE, WI
27K
Valmont
Power Plants
BOULDER, CO
21K
Bay Front
Power Plants
ASHLAND, WI
14K

Where Xcel Energy's reported CO₂e sits by state

51.4% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Colorado (9 sites) ; next is Texas at 29.3% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.

CO14.9MTX8.5MMN4.1MNM1.3MSD161KWI78K
EPA GHGRP · Xcel Energy facility CO₂e by state · May 2026

Xcel Energy reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent

Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (29.0M MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Xcel Energy's emissions profile

  • Xcel Energy runs high-intensity per facility (1.0M MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Power Plants sector on the Power Plants industry page.
  • It ranks #11 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Power Plants emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.