Facility ID: 1000365 · Waste

Kersey Valley MSW Landfill

Verify with EPA →

High Point, NC · GUILFORD COUNTY · NAICS 562212

Data updated May 2026

107K MT CO₂e · 2023

Kersey Valley MSW Landfill sits in the upper third of EPA GHGRP reporters by latest CO₂e (#2,512 of 8,713 nationally, #41 of 159 in NC).

  • National rank #2,512 of 8,713 GHGRP facilities
  • #41 of 159 in NC
  • #264 of 1,433 in Waste
  • 100% of CITY OF HIGH POINT NORTH CAROLINA parent CO₂e
  • 2023 mix: 100% non-CO₂ (CH₄-led)
  • +14.0% since 2011

Kersey Valley MSW Landfill vs all U.S. GHGRP facilities

Where this site's latest reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP reporting facility

106,753 2512th of 8713 higher than 6,201 of 8,713 facilities

GHGRP facilities, banded by latest reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more facilities. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

Facility footprint context

This site accounts for 100% of CITY OF HIGH POINT NORTH CAROLINA reported parent CO₂e (107K MT of 107K MT ). Inside the EPA Waste sector it ranks #264 of 1,433 facilities by latest CO₂e. Shares use GHGRP facility rollups only, not Scope 2/3 or non-reporting sites.

2023 gas mix desk

Of 107K MT CO₂e reported for 2023, non-CO₂ gases are 100% , led by CH₄ at 100% . Component shares use this facility's GHGRP CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year (already CO₂e-weighted).

CO₂
-
n/r
CH₄
100%
107K MT
N₂O
-
n/r

Emissions growth across reporting years

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Year Total CO2e (MT)
2023 106,753
2022 104,607
2021 102,390
2020 98,376
2019 94,134
2018 91,490
2017 89,391
2016 105,014
2015 102,365
2014 99,658
2013 97,011
2012 95,427
2011 93,670

Facility insight: Kersey Valley MSW Landfill

Kersey Valley MSW Landfill (GHGRP ID 1000365) is a high-volume reporter at 107K MT CO₂e in 2023 from High Point, NC (#2,512 of 8,713 nationally) under Waste (NAICS 562212).

From 2011 to 2023, reported CO₂e rose 14.0% (peak 107K MT). This facility has filed every year from 2011 to 2023, a complete 13-year record.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where does Kersey Valley MSW Landfill rank among U.S. GHGRP facilities? ▼

According to the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, Kersey Valley MSW Landfill ranks #2,512 of 8,713 reporting facilities by latest reported CO₂e, and #41 of 159 facilities in NC (same sort as the state facility table). See /methodology#corpus-placement.

What share of GHGRP facilities report less CO₂e than Kersey Valley MSW Landfill? ▼

Kersey Valley MSW Landfill's 107K MT CO₂e is higher than 6,201 of the 8,713 GHGRP facilities with reported emissions (71%), an exact count from the full corpus, not an estimate.

How much CO2 does Kersey Valley MSW Landfill emit? ▼

Kersey Valley MSW Landfill reported 107K MT CO2e in 2023.

What share of CITY OF HIGH POINT NORTH CAROLINA does Kersey Valley MSW Landfill represent? ▼

Kersey Valley MSW Landfill accounts for 100% of CITY OF HIGH POINT NORTH CAROLINA's reported GHGRP CO₂e (107K MT of 107K MT).

What is Kersey Valley MSW Landfill's 2023 CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O mix? ▼

In 2023, non-CO₂ gases were 100% of reported CO₂e at Kersey Valley MSW Landfill, with CH₄ the larger non-CO₂ share at 100%. Shares use the facility's GHGRP gas components for that year.

Where does Kersey Valley MSW Landfill rank inside Waste? ▼

Among EPA GHGRP facilities tagged Waste, Kersey Valley MSW Landfill ranks #264 of 1,433 by latest reported CO₂e.

Is Kersey Valley MSW Landfill reducing emissions? ▼

Over 13 reporting years (2011–2023), Kersey Valley MSW Landfill's emissions have increased by 14%. This may reflect expanded operations or increased production.

Nationwide facilities with similar CO₂e or sector

Peer sets outside NC for a top-third GHGRP emitter: CO₂e totals first, then Waste neighbors.

Data sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), Facility ID 1000365. Data subject to facility self-reporting, not compliance advice. See our methodology for how this data is sourced, computed, and verified. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCarbon