Roseville Energy Park
ROSEVILLE, CA · Placer · NAICS 221112
Data updated May 2026
Roseville Energy Park sits in the upper third of EPA GHGRP reporters by latest CO₂e (#1,982 of 8,713 nationally, #115 of 549 in CA).
- National rank #1,982 of 8,713 GHGRP facilities
- #115 of 549 in CA
- #881 of 1,732 in Power Plants
- 100% of ROSEVILLE ELECTRIC parent CO₂e
- 2023 mix: 0.1% non-CO₂ (N₂O-led)
- +178.5% since 2011
Roseville Energy Park vs all U.S. GHGRP facilities
Where this site's latest reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP reporting facility
153,906 1982nd of 8713 higher than 6,731 of 8,713 facilities
GHGRP facilities, banded by latest reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more facilities. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
Facility footprint context
This site accounts for 100% of ROSEVILLE ELECTRIC reported parent CO₂e (154K MT of 154K MT ). Inside the EPA Power Plants sector it ranks #881 of 1,732 facilities by latest CO₂e. Shares use GHGRP facility rollups only, not Scope 2/3 or non-reporting sites.
2023 gas mix desk
Of 154K MT CO₂e reported for 2023, non-CO₂ gases are 0.1% , led by N₂O at 0.1% . Component shares use this facility's GHGRP CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year (already CO₂e-weighted).
- CO₂
- 99.9%
- 154K MT
- CH₄
- 0%
- 72 MT
- N₂O
- 0.1%
- 85 MT
Emissions growth across reporting years
| Year | Total CO2e (MT) |
|---|---|
| 2023 | 153,906 |
| 2022 | 271,698 |
| 2021 | 231,878 |
| 2020 | 131,235 |
| 2019 | 130,376 |
| 2018 | 112,304 |
| 2017 | 15,881 |
| 2016 | 165,756 |
| 2015 | 265,688 |
| 2014 | 222,942 |
| 2013 | 226,415 |
| 2012 | 240,023 |
| 2011 | 55,262 |
Facility insight: Roseville Energy Park
Roseville Energy Park (GHGRP ID 1000485) is a high-volume reporter at 154K MT CO₂e in 2023 from ROSEVILLE, CA (#1,982 of 8,713 nationally) under Power Plants (NAICS 221112).
From 2011 to 2023, reported CO₂e rose 178.5% (peak 272K MT). This facility has filed every year from 2011 to 2023, a complete 13-year record.
Peak year was 2022 at 272K MT CO2e; latest 2023 sits 43.4% below that peak (154K MT). The largest year-to-year move was 2011→2012 (+334.3%, 185K MT).
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does Roseville Energy Park rank among U.S. GHGRP facilities? ▼
According to the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, Roseville Energy Park ranks #1,982 of 8,713 reporting facilities by latest reported CO₂e, and #115 of 549 facilities in CA (same sort as the state facility table). See /methodology#corpus-placement.
What share of GHGRP facilities report less CO₂e than Roseville Energy Park? ▼
Roseville Energy Park's 154K MT CO₂e is higher than 6,731 of the 8,713 GHGRP facilities with reported emissions (77%), an exact count from the full corpus, not an estimate.
How much CO2 does Roseville Energy Park emit? ▼
Roseville Energy Park reported 154K MT CO2e in 2023.
What share of ROSEVILLE ELECTRIC does Roseville Energy Park represent? ▼
Roseville Energy Park accounts for 100% of ROSEVILLE ELECTRIC's reported GHGRP CO₂e (154K MT of 154K MT).
What is Roseville Energy Park's 2023 CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O mix? ▼
In 2023, non-CO₂ gases were 0.1% of reported CO₂e at Roseville Energy Park, with N₂O the larger non-CO₂ share at 0.1% (CO₂ 99.9%). Shares use the facility's GHGRP gas components for that year.
Where does Roseville Energy Park rank inside Power Plants? ▼
Among EPA GHGRP facilities tagged Power Plants, Roseville Energy Park ranks #881 of 1,732 by latest reported CO₂e.
Is Roseville Energy Park reducing emissions? ▼
Over 13 reporting years (2011–2023), Roseville Energy Park's emissions have increased by 178.5%. This may reflect expanded operations or increased production.
Nationwide facilities with similar CO₂e or sector
Peer sets outside CA for a top-third GHGRP emitter: CO₂e totals first, then Power Plants neighbors.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest latest-year facility totals outside CA (154K MT here).
Similar Power Plants CO₂e
Nearest same-sector facility totals outside CA.