James De Young
HOLLAND, MI · Ottawa · NAICS 221112
Data updated May 2026
James De Young ranks among smaller GHGRP totals (#8,517 of 8,713 nationally; #251 of 260 in MI), a lower-footprint comparator in Power Plants.
- National rank #8,517 of 8,713 GHGRP facilities
- #251 of 260 in MI
- #1,652 of 1,732 in Power Plants
- -99.8% since 2011
James De Young vs all U.S. GHGRP facilities
Where this site's latest reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP reporting facility
536 8517th of 8713 higher than 196 of 8,713 facilities
GHGRP facilities, banded by latest reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more facilities. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2018
Facility footprint context
Inside the EPA Power Plants sector it ranks #1,652 of 1,732 facilities by latest CO₂e. Shares use GHGRP facility rollups only, not Scope 2/3 or non-reporting sites.
Emissions decline across reporting years
| Year | Total CO2e (MT) |
|---|---|
| 2018 | 536 |
| 2017 | 520 |
| 2016 | 26,220 |
| 2015 | 114,609 |
| 2014 | 79,852 |
| 2013 | 88,038 |
| 2012 | 79,287 |
| 2011 | 296,463 |
Facility insight: James De Young
James De Young (ID 1000681) reported 536 MT CO₂e for 2018 in Ottawa, MI (#8,517 of 8,713 by latest CO₂e).
Across 2011–2018, annual CO₂e fell 99.8%; peak load was 296K MT in 2011. This facility has filed every year from 2011 to 2018, a complete 8-year record.
Peak year was 2011 at 296K MT CO2e; latest 2018 sits 99.8% below that peak (536 MT). The largest year-to-year move was 2011→2012 (-73.3%, 217K MT).
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does James De Young rank among U.S. GHGRP facilities? ▼
According to the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, James De Young ranks #8,517 of 8,713 reporting facilities by latest reported CO₂e, and #251 of 260 facilities in MI (same sort as the state facility table). See /methodology#corpus-placement.
What share of GHGRP facilities report less CO₂e than James De Young? ▼
James De Young's 536 MT CO₂e is higher than 196 of the 8,713 GHGRP facilities with reported emissions (2%), an exact count from the full corpus, not an estimate.
How much CO2 does James De Young emit? ▼
James De Young reported 536 MT CO2e in 2018.
Where does James De Young rank inside Power Plants? ▼
Among EPA GHGRP facilities tagged Power Plants, James De Young ranks #1,652 of 1,732 by latest reported CO₂e.
Is James De Young reducing emissions? ▼
Over 8 reporting years (2011–2018), James De Young's emissions have decreased by 99.8%. This suggests meaningful progress in emissions reduction.
Nationwide facilities with similar CO₂e or sector
Lower-footprint peers outside MI: nearest CO₂e totals and same-sector reporters for context.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest latest-year facility totals outside MI (536 MT here).
Similar Power Plants CO₂e
Nearest same-sector facility totals outside MI.