James De Young
HOLLAND, MI · Ottawa · NAICS 221112
Last reported 2018. This facility's newest EPA GHGRP report is for 2018, not 2023, so its figures and its rank compare older data with 2023 peers. The ranking tables mark facilities like this one with a "Last reported" label.
Data updated May 2026
James De Young ranks among smaller GHGRP totals (#8,517 of 8,713 nationally; #251 of 260 in MI), a lower-footprint comparator in Power Plants.
- National rank #8,517 of 8,713 GHGRP facilities
- #251 of 260 in MI
- #1,652 of 1,732 in Power Plants
- -99.8% since 2011
James De Young vs all U.S. GHGRP facilities
Where this site's latest reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP reporting facility
536 8517th of 8713 higher than 196 of 8,713 facilities
GHGRP facilities, banded by latest reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more facilities. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2018
Facility footprint context
Inside the EPA Power Plants sector it ranks #1,652 of 1,732 facilities by latest CO₂e. Shares use GHGRP facility rollups only, not Scope 2/3 or non-reporting sites.
Emissions decline across reporting years
| Year | Total CO2e (MT) |
|---|---|
| 2018 | 536 |
| 2017 | 520 |
| 2016 | 26,220 |
| 2015 | 114,609 |
| 2014 | 79,852 |
| 2013 | 88,038 |
| 2012 | 79,287 |
| 2011 | 296,463 |
Facility insight: James De Young
James De Young (ID 1000681) reported 536 MT CO₂e for 2018 in Ottawa, MI (#8,517 of 8,713 by latest CO₂e).
Across 2011–2018, annual CO₂e fell 99.8%; peak load was 296K MT in 2011. This facility has filed every year from 2011 to 2018, a complete 8-year record.
Peak year was 2011 at 296K MT CO2e; latest 2018 sits 99.8% below that peak (536 MT). The largest year-to-year move was 2011→2012 (-73.3%, 217K MT).
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does James De Young rank among U.S. GHGRP facilities? ▼
According to the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, James De Young ranks #8,517 of 8,713 reporting facilities by latest reported CO₂e, and #251 of 260 facilities in MI (same sort as the state facility table). See /methodology#corpus-placement.
What share of GHGRP facilities report less CO₂e than James De Young? ▼
James De Young's 536 MT CO₂e is higher than 196 of the 8,713 GHGRP facilities with reported emissions (2%), an exact count from the full corpus, not an estimate.
How much CO2 does James De Young emit? ▼
James De Young reported 536 MT CO2e in 2018.
Where does James De Young rank inside Power Plants? ▼
Among EPA GHGRP facilities tagged Power Plants, James De Young ranks #1,652 of 1,732 by latest reported CO₂e.
Is James De Young reducing emissions? ▼
Over 8 reporting years (2011–2018), James De Young's emissions have decreased by 99.8%. This suggests meaningful progress in emissions reduction.
Nationwide facilities with similar CO₂e or sector
Lower-footprint peers outside MI: nearest CO₂e totals and same-sector reporters for context.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest latest-year facility totals outside MI (536 MT here).
Similar Power Plants CO₂e
Nearest same-sector facility totals outside MI.