James River
SPRINGFIELD, MO · Greene · NAICS 221112
Data updated May 2026
James River sits in the upper third of EPA GHGRP reporters by latest CO₂e (#2,638 of 8,713 nationally, #43 of 131 in MO).
- National rank #2,638 of 8,713 GHGRP facilities
- #43 of 131 in MO
- #973 of 1,732 in Power Plants
- 4.8% of CITY UTILITIES OF SPRINGFIELD MISSOURI parent CO₂e
- 2023 mix: 0.1% non-CO₂ (N₂O-led)
- -90.9% since 2011
James River vs all U.S. GHGRP facilities
Where this site's latest reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP reporting facility
99,439 2638th of 8713 higher than 6,075 of 8,713 facilities
GHGRP facilities, banded by latest reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more facilities. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
Facility footprint context
This site accounts for 4.8% of CITY UTILITIES OF SPRINGFIELD MISSOURI reported parent CO₂e (99K MT of 2.1M MT ; #2 of 3 GHGRP facilities under that parent ). Inside the EPA Power Plants sector it ranks #973 of 1,732 facilities by latest CO₂e. Shares use GHGRP facility rollups only, not Scope 2/3 or non-reporting sites.
2023 gas mix desk
Of 99K MT CO₂e reported for 2023, non-CO₂ gases are 0.1% , led by N₂O at 0.1% . Component shares use this facility's GHGRP CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year (already CO₂e-weighted).
- CO₂
- 99.9%
- 99K MT
- CH₄
- 0%
- 47 MT
- N₂O
- 0.1%
- 57 MT
Emissions decline across reporting years
| Year | Total CO2e (MT) |
|---|---|
| 2023 | 99,439 |
| 2022 | 107,350 |
| 2021 | 81,071 |
| 2020 | 90,933 |
| 2019 | 102,236 |
| 2018 | 92,282 |
| 2017 | 65,265 |
| 2016 | 129,141 |
| 2015 | 249,272 |
| 2014 | 734,861 |
| 2013 | 696,446 |
| 2012 | 695,172 |
| 2011 | 1,088,732 |
Facility insight: James River
James River (GHGRP ID 1000713) is a high-volume reporter at 99K MT CO₂e in 2023 from SPRINGFIELD, MO (#2,638 of 8,713 nationally) under Power Plants (NAICS 221112).
Across 2011–2023, annual CO₂e fell 90.9%; peak load was 1.1M MT in 2011. This facility has filed every year from 2011 to 2023, a complete 13-year record.
Peak year was 2011 at 1.1M MT CO2e; latest 2023 sits 90.9% below that peak (99K MT). The largest year-to-year move was 2014→2015 (-66.1%, 486K MT).
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does James River rank among U.S. GHGRP facilities? ▼
According to the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, James River ranks #2,638 of 8,713 reporting facilities by latest reported CO₂e, and #43 of 131 facilities in MO (same sort as the state facility table). See /methodology#corpus-placement.
What share of GHGRP facilities report less CO₂e than James River? ▼
James River's 99K MT CO₂e is higher than 6,075 of the 8,713 GHGRP facilities with reported emissions (70%), an exact count from the full corpus, not an estimate.
How much CO2 does James River emit? ▼
James River reported 99K MT CO2e in 2023.
What share of CITY UTILITIES OF SPRINGFIELD MISSOURI does James River represent? ▼
James River accounts for 4.8% of CITY UTILITIES OF SPRINGFIELD MISSOURI's reported GHGRP CO₂e (99K MT of 2.1M MT), ranking #2 of 3 facilities under that parent.
What is James River's 2023 CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O mix? ▼
In 2023, non-CO₂ gases were 0.1% of reported CO₂e at James River, with N₂O the larger non-CO₂ share at 0.1% (CO₂ 99.9%). Shares use the facility's GHGRP gas components for that year.
Where does James River rank inside Power Plants? ▼
Among EPA GHGRP facilities tagged Power Plants, James River ranks #973 of 1,732 by latest reported CO₂e.
Is James River reducing emissions? ▼
Over 13 reporting years (2011–2023), James River's emissions have decreased by 90.9%. This suggests meaningful progress in emissions reduction.
Nationwide facilities with similar CO₂e or sector
Peer sets outside MO for a top-third GHGRP emitter: CO₂e totals first, then Power Plants neighbors.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest latest-year facility totals outside MO (99K MT here).
Similar Power Plants CO₂e
Nearest same-sector facility totals outside MO.