Bull Run
CLINTON, TN · Anderson · NAICS 221112
Data updated May 2026
Bull Run sits in the upper third of EPA GHGRP reporters by latest CO₂e (#734 of 8,713 nationally, #9 of 144 in TN).
- National rank #734 of 8,713 GHGRP facilities
- #9 of 144 in TN
- #511 of 1,732 in Power Plants
- 2% of US GOVERNMENT parent CO₂e
- 2023 mix: 0.8% non-CO₂ (N₂O-led)
- -66.4% since 2011
Bull Run vs all U.S. GHGRP facilities
Where this site's latest reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP reporting facility
830,801 734th of 8713 higher than 7,979 of 8,713 facilities
GHGRP facilities, banded by latest reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more facilities. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
Facility footprint context
This site accounts for 2% of US GOVERNMENT reported parent CO₂e (831K MT of 41.4M MT ; #13 of 83 GHGRP facilities under that parent ). Inside the EPA Power Plants sector it ranks #511 of 1,732 facilities by latest CO₂e. Shares use GHGRP facility rollups only, not Scope 2/3 or non-reporting sites.
2023 gas mix desk
Of 831K MT CO₂e reported for 2023, non-CO₂ gases are 0.8% , led by N₂O at 0.5% . Component shares use this facility's GHGRP CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year (already CO₂e-weighted).
- CO₂
- 99.2%
- 824K MT
- CH₄
- 0.3%
- 2K MT
- N₂O
- 0.5%
- 4K MT
Emissions decline across reporting years
| Year | Total CO2e (MT) |
|---|---|
| 2023 | 830,801 |
| 2022 | 1,171,804 |
| 2021 | 911,636 |
| 2020 | 690,551 |
| 2019 | 1,381,663 |
| 2018 | 1,459,026 |
| 2017 | 2,747,701 |
| 2016 | 1,892,430 |
| 2015 | 2,309,244 |
| 2014 | 2,929,249 |
| 2013 | 879,288 |
| 2012 | 1,767,372 |
| 2011 | 2,475,361 |
Facility insight: Bull Run
Bull Run (GHGRP ID 1000917) is a high-volume reporter at 831K MT CO₂e in 2023 from CLINTON, TN (#734 of 8,713 nationally) under Power Plants (NAICS 221112).
Across 2011–2023, annual CO₂e fell 66.4%; peak load was 2.9M MT in 2014. This facility has filed every year from 2011 to 2023, a complete 13-year record.
Peak year was 2014 at 2.9M MT CO2e; latest 2023 sits 71.6% below that peak (831K MT). The largest year-to-year move was 2013→2014 (+233.1%, 2.0M MT).
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does Bull Run rank among U.S. GHGRP facilities? ▼
According to the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, Bull Run ranks #734 of 8,713 reporting facilities by latest reported CO₂e, and #9 of 144 facilities in TN (same sort as the state facility table). See /methodology#corpus-placement.
What share of GHGRP facilities report less CO₂e than Bull Run? ▼
Bull Run's 831K MT CO₂e is higher than 7,979 of the 8,713 GHGRP facilities with reported emissions (92%), an exact count from the full corpus, not an estimate.
How much CO2 does Bull Run emit? ▼
Bull Run reported 831K MT CO2e in 2023.
What share of US GOVERNMENT does Bull Run represent? ▼
Bull Run accounts for 2% of US GOVERNMENT's reported GHGRP CO₂e (831K MT of 41.4M MT), ranking #13 of 83 facilities under that parent.
What is Bull Run's 2023 CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O mix? ▼
In 2023, non-CO₂ gases were 0.8% of reported CO₂e at Bull Run, with N₂O the larger non-CO₂ share at 0.5% (CO₂ 99.2%). Shares use the facility's GHGRP gas components for that year.
Where does Bull Run rank inside Power Plants? ▼
Among EPA GHGRP facilities tagged Power Plants, Bull Run ranks #511 of 1,732 by latest reported CO₂e.
Is Bull Run reducing emissions? ▼
Over 13 reporting years (2011–2023), Bull Run's emissions have decreased by 66.4%. This suggests meaningful progress in emissions reduction.
Nationwide facilities with similar CO₂e or sector
Peer sets outside TN for a top-third GHGRP emitter: CO₂e totals first, then Power Plants neighbors.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest latest-year facility totals outside TN (831K MT here).
Similar Power Plants CO₂e
Nearest same-sector facility totals outside TN.