Forked River
FORKED RIVER, NJ · Ocean · NAICS 221112
Data updated May 2026
Forked River ranks among smaller GHGRP totals (#7,994 of 8,713 nationally; #96 of 120 in NJ), a lower-footprint comparator in Power Plants.
- National rank #7,994 of 8,713 GHGRP facilities
- #96 of 120 in NJ
- #1,524 of 1,732 in Power Plants
- +87.5% since 2011
Forked River vs all U.S. GHGRP facilities
Where this site's latest reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP reporting facility
5,339 7994th of 8713 higher than 719 of 8,713 facilities
GHGRP facilities, banded by latest reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more facilities. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2014
Facility footprint context
Inside the EPA Power Plants sector it ranks #1,524 of 1,732 facilities by latest CO₂e. Shares use GHGRP facility rollups only, not Scope 2/3 or non-reporting sites.
Emissions growth across reporting years
| Year | Total CO2e (MT) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 5,339 |
| 2013 | 3,382 |
| 2012 | 1,615 |
| 2011 | 2,848 |
Facility insight: Forked River
Forked River (ID 1001076) reported 5K MT CO₂e for 2014 in Ocean, NJ (#7,994 of 8,713 by latest CO₂e).
From 2011 to 2014, reported CO₂e rose 87.5% (peak 5K MT). This facility has filed every year from 2011 to 2014, a complete 4-year record.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does Forked River rank among U.S. GHGRP facilities? ▼
According to the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, Forked River ranks #7,994 of 8,713 reporting facilities by latest reported CO₂e, and #96 of 120 facilities in NJ (same sort as the state facility table). See /methodology#corpus-placement.
What share of GHGRP facilities report less CO₂e than Forked River? ▼
Forked River's 5K MT CO₂e is higher than 719 of the 8,713 GHGRP facilities with reported emissions (8%), an exact count from the full corpus, not an estimate.
How much CO2 does Forked River emit? ▼
Forked River reported 5K MT CO2e in 2014.
Where does Forked River rank inside Power Plants? ▼
Among EPA GHGRP facilities tagged Power Plants, Forked River ranks #1,524 of 1,732 by latest reported CO₂e.
Is Forked River reducing emissions? ▼
Over 4 reporting years (2011–2014), Forked River's emissions have increased by 87.5%. This may reflect expanded operations or increased production.
Nationwide facilities with similar CO₂e or sector
Lower-footprint peers outside NJ: nearest CO₂e totals and same-sector reporters for context.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest latest-year facility totals outside NJ (5K MT here).
Similar Power Plants CO₂e
Nearest same-sector facility totals outside NJ.