Forked River
FORKED RIVER, NJ · Ocean · NAICS 221112
Last reported 2014. This facility's newest EPA GHGRP report is for 2014, not 2023, so its figures and its rank compare older data with 2023 peers. The ranking tables mark facilities like this one with a "Last reported" label.
Data updated May 2026
Forked River ranks among smaller GHGRP totals (#7,994 of 8,713 nationally; #96 of 120 in NJ), a lower-footprint comparator in Power Plants.
- National rank #7,994 of 8,713 GHGRP facilities
- #96 of 120 in NJ
- #1,524 of 1,732 in Power Plants
- +87.5% since 2011
Forked River vs all U.S. GHGRP facilities
Where this site's latest reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP reporting facility
5,339 7994th of 8713 higher than 719 of 8,713 facilities
GHGRP facilities, banded by latest reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more facilities. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2014
Facility footprint context
Inside the EPA Power Plants sector it ranks #1,524 of 1,732 facilities by latest CO₂e. Shares use GHGRP facility rollups only, not Scope 2/3 or non-reporting sites.
Emissions growth across reporting years
| Year | Total CO2e (MT) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 5,339 |
| 2013 | 3,382 |
| 2012 | 1,615 |
| 2011 | 2,848 |
Facility insight: Forked River
Forked River (ID 1001076) reported 5K MT CO₂e for 2014 in Ocean, NJ (#7,994 of 8,713 by latest CO₂e).
From 2011 to 2014, reported CO₂e rose 87.5% (peak 5K MT). This facility has filed every year from 2011 to 2014, a complete 4-year record.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does Forked River rank among U.S. GHGRP facilities? ▼
According to the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, Forked River ranks #7,994 of 8,713 reporting facilities by latest reported CO₂e, and #96 of 120 facilities in NJ (same sort as the state facility table). See /methodology#corpus-placement.
What share of GHGRP facilities report less CO₂e than Forked River? ▼
Forked River's 5K MT CO₂e is higher than 719 of the 8,713 GHGRP facilities with reported emissions (8%), an exact count from the full corpus, not an estimate.
How much CO2 does Forked River emit? ▼
Forked River reported 5K MT CO2e in 2014.
Where does Forked River rank inside Power Plants? ▼
Among EPA GHGRP facilities tagged Power Plants, Forked River ranks #1,524 of 1,732 by latest reported CO₂e.
Is Forked River reducing emissions? ▼
Over 4 reporting years (2011–2014), Forked River's emissions have increased by 87.5%. This may reflect expanded operations or increased production.
Nationwide facilities with similar CO₂e or sector
Lower-footprint peers outside NJ: nearest CO₂e totals and same-sector reporters for context.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest latest-year facility totals outside NJ (5K MT here).
Similar Power Plants CO₂e
Nearest same-sector facility totals outside NJ.