Cecil Lynch
NORTH LITTLE ROCK, AR · Pulaski · NAICS 221112
Last reported 2013. This facility's newest EPA GHGRP report is for 2013, not 2023, so its figures and its rank compare older data with 2023 peers. The ranking tables mark facilities like this one with a "Last reported" label.
Data updated May 2026
Cecil Lynch ranks among smaller GHGRP totals (#8,695 of 8,713 nationally; #184 of 185 in AR), a lower-footprint comparator in Power Plants.
- National rank #8,695 of 8,713 GHGRP facilities
- #184 of 185 in AR
- #1,726 of 1,732 in Power Plants
- -100.0% since 2011
Cecil Lynch vs all U.S. GHGRP facilities
Where this site's latest reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP reporting facility
2 8695th of 8713 higher than 17 of 8,713 facilities
GHGRP facilities, banded by latest reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more facilities. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2013
Facility footprint context
Inside the EPA Power Plants sector it ranks #1,726 of 1,732 facilities by latest CO₂e. Shares use GHGRP facility rollups only, not Scope 2/3 or non-reporting sites.
Emissions decline across reporting years
| Year | Total CO2e (MT) |
|---|---|
| 2013 | 2 |
| 2012 | 2,945 |
| 2011 | 85,567 |
Facility insight: Cecil Lynch
Cecil Lynch (ID 1001429) reported 2 MT CO₂e for 2013 in Pulaski, AR (#8,695 of 8,713 by latest CO₂e).
Across 2011–2013, annual CO₂e fell 100.0%; peak load was 86K MT in 2011. This facility has filed every year from 2011 to 2013, a complete 3-year record.
Peak year was 2011 at 86K MT CO2e; latest 2013 sits 100% below that peak (2 MT). The largest year-to-year move was 2011→2012 (-96.6%, 83K MT).
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does Cecil Lynch rank among U.S. GHGRP facilities? ▼
According to the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, Cecil Lynch ranks #8,695 of 8,713 reporting facilities by latest reported CO₂e, and #184 of 185 facilities in AR (same sort as the state facility table). See /methodology#corpus-placement.
What share of GHGRP facilities report less CO₂e than Cecil Lynch? ▼
Cecil Lynch's 2 MT CO₂e is higher than 17 of the 8,713 GHGRP facilities with reported emissions (0%), an exact count from the full corpus, not an estimate.
How much CO2 does Cecil Lynch emit? ▼
Cecil Lynch reported 2 MT CO2e in 2013.
Where does Cecil Lynch rank inside Power Plants? ▼
Among EPA GHGRP facilities tagged Power Plants, Cecil Lynch ranks #1,726 of 1,732 by latest reported CO₂e.
Is Cecil Lynch reducing emissions? ▼
Over 3 reporting years (2011–2013), Cecil Lynch's emissions have decreased by 100%. This suggests meaningful progress in emissions reduction.
Nationwide facilities with similar CO₂e or sector
Lower-footprint peers outside AR: nearest CO₂e totals and same-sector reporters for context.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest latest-year facility totals outside AR (2 MT here).
Similar Power Plants CO₂e
Nearest same-sector facility totals outside AR.