GlaxoSmithKline
Research Triangle Park, NC · DURHAM COUNTY · NAICS 325411
Last reported 2015. This facility's newest EPA GHGRP report is for 2015, not 2023, so its figures and its rank compare older data with 2023 peers. The ranking tables mark facilities like this one with a "Last reported" label.
Data updated May 2026
GlaxoSmithKline ranks among smaller GHGRP totals (#7,216 of 8,713 nationally; #135 of 159 in NC), a lower-footprint comparator in Chemicals.
- National rank #7,216 of 8,713 GHGRP facilities
- #135 of 159 in NC
- #482 of 534 in Chemicals
- -41.1% since 2011
GlaxoSmithKline vs all U.S. GHGRP facilities
Where this site's latest reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP reporting facility
14,382 7216th of 8713 higher than 1,497 of 8,713 facilities
GHGRP facilities, banded by latest reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more facilities. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2015
Facility footprint context
Inside the EPA Chemicals sector it ranks #482 of 534 facilities by latest CO₂e. Shares use GHGRP facility rollups only, not Scope 2/3 or non-reporting sites.
Emissions decline across reporting years
| Year | Total CO2e (MT) |
|---|---|
| 2015 | 14,382 |
| 2014 | 17,052 |
| 2013 | 16,341 |
| 2012 | 15,098 |
| 2011 | 24,421 |
Facility insight: GlaxoSmithKline
GlaxoSmithKline (ID 1002857) reported 14K MT CO₂e for 2015 in DURHAM COUNTY, NC (#7,216 of 8,713 by latest CO₂e).
Across 2011–2015, annual CO₂e fell 41.1%; peak load was 24K MT in 2011. This facility has filed every year from 2011 to 2015, a complete 5-year record.
Peak year was 2011 at 24K MT CO2e; latest 2015 sits 41.1% below that peak (14K MT). The largest year-to-year move was 2011→2012 (-38.2%, 9K MT).
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does GlaxoSmithKline rank among U.S. GHGRP facilities? ▼
According to the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, GlaxoSmithKline ranks #7,216 of 8,713 reporting facilities by latest reported CO₂e, and #135 of 159 facilities in NC (same sort as the state facility table). See /methodology#corpus-placement.
What share of GHGRP facilities report less CO₂e than GlaxoSmithKline? ▼
GlaxoSmithKline's 14K MT CO₂e is higher than 1,497 of the 8,713 GHGRP facilities with reported emissions (17%), an exact count from the full corpus, not an estimate.
How much CO2 does GlaxoSmithKline emit? ▼
GlaxoSmithKline reported 14K MT CO2e in 2015.
Where does GlaxoSmithKline rank inside Chemicals? ▼
Among EPA GHGRP facilities tagged Chemicals, GlaxoSmithKline ranks #482 of 534 by latest reported CO₂e.
Is GlaxoSmithKline reducing emissions? ▼
Over 5 reporting years (2011–2015), GlaxoSmithKline's emissions have decreased by 41.1%. This suggests meaningful progress in emissions reduction.
Nationwide facilities with similar CO₂e or sector
Lower-footprint peers outside NC: nearest CO₂e totals and same-sector reporters for context.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest latest-year facility totals outside NC (14K MT here).
Similar Chemicals CO₂e
Nearest same-sector facility totals outside NC.